Development and Standardization of an Improved Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score for Use in Newborn Screening and Incident Diagnosis - PubMed
. 2019 Feb;42(2):200-207.
doi: 10.2337/dc18-1785.
Stephen S Rich 2 , Andrew R Wood 1 , Samuel E Jones 1 , Robin N Beaumont 1 , James W Harrison 1 , Darius A Schneider 3 4 , Jonathan M Locke 1 , Jess Tyrrell 1 , Michael N Weedon 1 , William A Hagopian 5 , Richard A Oram 6 7
Affiliations
- PMID: 30655379
- PMCID: PMC6341291
- DOI: 10.2337/dc18-1785
Development and Standardization of an Improved Type 1 Diabetes Genetic Risk Score for Use in Newborn Screening and Incident Diagnosis
Seth A Sharp et al. Diabetes Care. 2019 Feb.
Abstract
Objective: Previously generated genetic risk scores (GRSs) for type 1 diabetes (T1D) have not captured all known information at non-HLA loci or, particularly, at HLA risk loci. We aimed to more completely incorporate HLA alleles, their interactions, and recently discovered non-HLA loci into an improved T1D GRS (termed the "T1D GRS2") to better discriminate diabetes subtypes and to predict T1D in newborn screening studies.
Research design and methods: In 6,481 case and 9,247 control subjects from the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium, we analyzed variants associated with T1D both in the HLA region and across the genome. We modeled interactions between variants marking strongly associated HLA haplotypes and generated odds ratios to create the improved GRS, the T1D GRS2. We validated our findings in UK Biobank. We assessed the impact of the T1D GRS2 in newborn screening and diabetes classification and sought to provide a framework for comparison with previous scores.
Results: The T1D GRS2 used 67 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and accounted for interactions between 18 HLA DR-DQ haplotype combinations. The T1D GRS2 was highly discriminative for all T1D (area under the curve [AUC] 0.92; P < 0.0001 vs. older scores) and even more discriminative for early-onset T1D (AUC 0.96). In simulated newborn screening, the T1D GRS2 was nearly twice as efficient as HLA genotyping alone and 50% better than current genetic scores in general population T1D prediction.
Conclusions: An improved T1D GRS, the T1D GRS2, is highly useful for classifying adult incident diabetes type and improving newborn screening. Given the cost-effectiveness of SNP genotyping, this approach has great clinical and research potential in T1D.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.
Figures

Manhattan plots of GWAS before and after adjustment for GRSs. Top row, GWAS: unadjusted (A), after adjustment for GRS1 (B), and after adjustment for GRS2 (C). Bottom row, high-resolution plot of association scores for the full HLA region on chromosome 6q: unadjusted (D), after adjustment for GRS1 (E), and after adjustment for GRS2 (F). MB, megabases.

ROC curves comparing the ability of GRS1 and GRS2, and their components, to discriminate T1D. For each pair of curves in a panel, ROC AUCs are shown as well as the P value for their comparison by the DeLong algorithm. A: HLA DR-DQ haplotypes and interaction terms for GRS1 vs. GRS2 in the T1DGC. B: Both non–DR-DQ HLA and non-HLA loci for GRS1 vs. GRS2 in the T1DGC. C: Full GRS1 vs. full GRS2 in the T1DGC discovery data set. D: HLA DR-DQ haplotypes and interaction terms, for GRS1 vs. GRS2, in the UK Biobank (UKB). E: Both non–DR-DQ HLA and non-HLA loci, for GRS1 vs. GRS2, in UK Biobank. F: Full GRS1 vs. full GRS2 in UK Biobank.

A and B: Comparison of how well GRS1 (A) and GRS2 (B) discriminate those with T1D from control subjects. C and D: Comparison of how well GRS1 (C) and GRS2 (D) discriminate those with T1D from those with T2D. Note the similar distribution of T1D GRS2 scores in the background population and in those with T2D.
Similar articles
-
Onengut-Gumuscu S, Chen WM, Robertson CC, Bonnie JK, Farber E, Zhu Z, Oksenberg JR, Brant SR, Bridges SL Jr, Edberg JC, Kimberly RP, Gregersen PK, Rewers MJ, Steck AK, Black MH, Dabelea D, Pihoker C, Atkinson MA, Wagenknecht LE, Divers J, Bell RA; SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth; Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium; Erlich HA, Concannon P, Rich SS. Onengut-Gumuscu S, et al. Diabetes Care. 2019 Mar;42(3):406-415. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1727. Epub 2019 Jan 18. Diabetes Care. 2019. PMID: 30659077 Free PMC article.
-
Oram RA, Patel K, Hill A, Shields B, McDonald TJ, Jones A, Hattersley AT, Weedon MN. Oram RA, et al. Diabetes Care. 2016 Mar;39(3):337-44. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1111. Epub 2015 Nov 17. Diabetes Care. 2016. PMID: 26577414 Free PMC article.
-
Improved genetic risk scoring algorithm for type 1 diabetes prediction.
Qu HQ, Qu J, Glessner J, Liu Y, Mentch F, Chang X, March M, Li J, Roizen JD, Connolly JJ, Sleiman P, Hakonarson H. Qu HQ, et al. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 May;23(3):320-323. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13310. Epub 2022 Jan 19. Pediatr Diabetes. 2022. PMID: 34997821 Free PMC article.
-
Genetics and its potential to improve type 1 diabetes care.
Rich SS. Rich SS. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017 Aug;24(4):279-284. doi: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000347. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2017. PMID: 28509690 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immunogenetics of type 1 diabetes: A comprehensive review.
Noble JA. Noble JA. J Autoimmun. 2015 Nov;64:101-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Aug 10. J Autoimmun. 2015. PMID: 26272854 Review.
Cited by
-
Fuhri Snethlage CM, Balvers M, Ferwerda B, Rampanelli E, de Groen P, Roep BO, Herrema H, McDonald TJ, van Raalte DH, Weedon MN, Oram RA, Nieuwdorp M, Hanssen NMJ. Fuhri Snethlage CM, et al. Diabetologia. 2024 Sep;67(9):1865-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06204-6. Epub 2024 Jun 26. Diabetologia. 2024. PMID: 38922416 Free PMC article.
-
A Triple Threat? The Role of Diet, Nutrition, and the Microbiota in T1D Pathogenesis.
Hamilton-Williams EE, Lorca GL, Norris JM, Dunne JL. Hamilton-Williams EE, et al. Front Nutr. 2021 Apr 1;8:600756. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.600756. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33869260 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ethnic differences in the manifestation of early-onset type 2 diabetes.
Kibirige D, Katte JC, Hill AV, Sekitoleko I, Lumu W, Knupp J, Squires S, Hattersley AT, Smeeth L, Jones AG, Nyirenda MJ. Kibirige D, et al. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024 Aug 29;12(4):e004174. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004174. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2024. PMID: 39209773 Free PMC article.
-
Ghalwash M, Anand V, Lou O, Martin F, Rewers M, Ziegler AG, Toppari J, Hagopian WA, Veijola R; Type 1 Diabetes Intelligence Study Group. Ghalwash M, et al. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Apr;7(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(22)00350-9. Epub 2023 Jan 18. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023. PMID: 36681087 Free PMC article.
-
Jin H, Kim YA, Lee Y, Kwon SH, Do AR, Seo S, Won S, Seo JH. Jin H, et al. BMC Med. 2023 Jan 11;21(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02723-4. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 36627639 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Florez JC. Found in translation: a type 1 diabetes genetic risk score applied to clinical diagnosis. Diabetes Care 2016;39:330–332 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials