A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Two 3-Dose Regimens of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine in Healthy US Adults Aged 65 to 85 Years - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2020
Clinical Trial
A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Two 3-Dose Regimens of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine in Healthy US Adults Aged 65 to 85 Years
Nicholas Kitchin et al. Clin Infect Dis. 2020.
Abstract
Background: Clostridium difficile causes toxin-mediated nosocomial diarrhea and community-acquired infections; no preventive vaccine is licensed. In this phase 2 study, we explored safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity in older US adults of an investigational bivalent C. difficile vaccine that contains equal dosages of genetically and chemically detoxified toxins A and B.
Methods: Conducted from July 2015 through March 2017, 855 healthy adults aged 65-85 years from 15 US centers were randomized 3:3:1 to receive vaccine (100 or 200 μg) or placebo at 0, 1, and 6 months (month regimen) or 1, 8, and 30 days (day regimen). Serum toxin A- and B-specific neutralizing antibodies were measured. Participant-reported local reactions (LRs) and systemic events (SEs), adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, newly diagnosed chronic medical conditions, and immediate AEs were recorded.
Results: The 200-μg dose level elicited higher immune responses than the 100-µg dose level across regimens. Compared with the day regimen, the month regimen induced stronger and more persistent immune responses that remained elevated 12 months after dose 3. Responses peaked at month 7 (month regimen) and day 37 (day regimen). LRs (primarily injection site pain) were more frequent in vaccine recipients than controls; SE frequency was similar across groups. More related AEs were reported in the day regimen group than the month regimen group.
Conclusions: The C. difficile vaccine was safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic in healthy US adults aged 65-85 years. Immune responses were particularly robust in the 200-μg month regimen group. These results support continued vaccine development.
Clinical trials registration: NCT02561195.
Keywords: Clostridium difficile infection; United States; adults; nosocomial diarrhea; toxoid vaccine.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54cc9/54cc9142354e246214bbaed372c98b3b375e887c" alt="Figure 1."
CONSORT diagram with participant dispositions in the (A) month and (B) day regimens. Reasons for withdrawals after vaccination include all withdrawals from dose 1 onward. *One participant in the 100-μg dose level group in the day regimen withdrew after randomization before receiving any study vaccination.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abb9c/abb9caff30592519ccfad076c476a63d3edeaf42" alt="Figure 2."
Percentages of participants who achieved prespecified levels of toxin A– and toxin B–specific neutralizing antibodies in the month and day regimens. Arrows indicate days on which doses were administered. Abbreviation: C diff, Clostridium difficile vaccine.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6da9d/6da9deeb0a76c2526f2e973b75d20831ff8ae5fa" alt="Figure 3."
Geometric mean concentrations of toxin A– and toxin B–specific neutralizing antibodies for baseline seronegative, baseline seropositive, and all participants in the 200-µg group in the month and day regimens. Arrows indicate days on which doses were administered. Abbreviation: GMC, geometric mean concentration.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf67d/bf67dbb029b1c288366983a92622e603e97959d6" alt="Figure 4."
Local reactions and systemic events by dose in the (A) month and (B) day regimens. Abbreviations: 100 = 100 μg Clostridium difficile vaccine; 200 = 200 μg Clostridium difficile vaccine; P, placebo.
Similar articles
-
Inoue M, Yonemura T, de Solom R, Yamaji M, Aizawa M, Knirsch C, Pride MW, Jansen KU, Gruber W, Webber C. Inoue M, et al. Vaccine. 2019 May 1;37(19):2600-2607. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Apr 5. Vaccine. 2019. PMID: 30962095 Clinical Trial.
-
Sheldon E, Kitchin N, Peng Y, Eiden J, Gruber W, Johnson E, Jansen KU, Pride MW, Pedneault L. Sheldon E, et al. Vaccine. 2016 Apr 19;34(18):2082-91. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 15. Vaccine. 2016. PMID: 26993331 Clinical Trial.
-
Anosova NG, Brown AM, Li L, Liu N, Cole LE, Zhang J, Mehta H, Kleanthous H. Anosova NG, et al. J Med Microbiol. 2013 Sep;62(Pt 9):1394-1404. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.056796-0. Epub 2013 Mar 21. J Med Microbiol. 2013. PMID: 23518659
-
[Clostridium Difficile: Monoclonal Antibody Therapy and Vaccines].
Reisinger EC, Ebbers M, Löbermann M. Reisinger EC, et al. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2019 Jun;144(12):842-849. doi: 10.1055/a-0882-7530. Epub 2019 Jun 18. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2019. PMID: 31212328 Review. German.
-
The prospect for vaccines to prevent Clostridium difficile infection.
Ghose C, Kelly CP. Ghose C, et al. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;29(1):145-62. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.013. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015. PMID: 25677708 Review.
Cited by
-
Pasiarski M, Sosnowska-Pasiarska B, Grywalska E, Stelmach-Gołdyś A, Kowalik A, Góźdź S, Roliński J. Pasiarski M, et al. Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 9;14:1741-1749. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S220423. eCollection 2019. Clin Interv Aging. 2019. PMID: 31631993 Free PMC article.
-
Remich S, Kitchin N, Peterson J, Li P, Pride MW, Brock L, Anderson AS, Gruber WC, Jansen KU, Lockhart SP, Webber C. Remich S, et al. J Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 14;229(2):367-375. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiad307. J Infect Dis. 2024. PMID: 37531657 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Frost I, Sati H, Garcia-Vello P, Hasso-Agopsowicz M, Lienhardt C, Gigante V, Beyer P. Frost I, et al. Lancet Microbe. 2023 Feb;4(2):e113-e125. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(22)00303-2. Epub 2022 Dec 14. Lancet Microbe. 2023. PMID: 36528040 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Advances in Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection.
Vitiello A, Sabbatucci M, Zovi A, Salzano A, Ponzo A, Boccellino M. Vitiello A, et al. J Clin Med. 2024 Feb 26;13(5):1331. doi: 10.3390/jcm13051331. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38592194 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Immune response against Clostridioides difficile and translation to therapy.
Sehgal K, Khanna S. Sehgal K, et al. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 May 7;14:17562848211014817. doi: 10.1177/17562848211014817. eCollection 2021. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2021. PMID: 33995585 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Leffler DA, Lamont JT. Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med 2015; 372:1539–48. - PubMed
-
- Bauer MP, Notermans DW, van Benthem BH, et al. ; ECDIS Study Group Clostridium difficile infection in Europe: a hospital-based survey. Lancet 2011; 377:63–73. - PubMed
-
- Kelly CP, Pothoulakis C, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile colitis. N Engl J Med 1994; 330:257–62. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources