Is Wikipedia a complete and accurate source for musculoskeletal anatomy? - PubMed
Comparative Study
. 2019 Oct;41(10):1187-1192.
doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02280-1. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
Affiliations
- PMID: 31264001
- DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02280-1
Comparative Study
Is Wikipedia a complete and accurate source for musculoskeletal anatomy?
Daniel A London et al. Surg Radiol Anat. 2019 Oct.
Abstract
Purpose: Wikipedia is a popular online encyclopedia generating over 5.4 billion visits per month, and it is also a common resource for the general public and professionals for medical information. The goal of this study is to determine the accuracy and completeness of Wikipedia as a resource for musculoskeletal anatomy.
Methods: The origin, insertion, innervation, and function of all muscles of the upper and lower extremities as detailed on Wikipedia was compared to the available corresponding information in Grant's Atlas of Anatomy (14th edition). Entries were scored for both accuracy and completeness. Descriptive statistics were calculated and associations between and within entries for accuracy and completeness were assessed by McNemar's tests. Information on Wikipedia's references was also collected.
Results: Overall, data on Wikipedia was 97.6% complete and 98.8% accurate when compared to Grant's Atlas of Anatomy. 78.6% of all entries were fully complete and accurate, with 15.3% of entries containing one error and 6.1% containing two errors. There were no associations between or within entries' accuracy and completeness. Only 62% of references from Wikipedia included were from academic sources.
Conclusions: Musculoskeletal anatomy entries on Wikipedia are imperfect; they have inaccurate and missing information. Furthermore, a considerable proportion of references cited in entries are from poorly identified sources. While Wikipedia is an easily accessible resource for a large number of people and much of the anatomic information is appropriate, it cannot be considered to be an equivalent resource when compared to anatomic texts.
Keywords: Anatomy; Grant’s anatomy; Internet resources; Medical education; Musculoskeletal anatomy; Online learning; Wikipedia.
Similar articles
-
Wikipedia and medicine: quantifying readership, editors, and the significance of natural language.
Heilman JM, West AG. Heilman JM, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 4;17(3):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4069. J Med Internet Res. 2015. PMID: 25739399 Free PMC article.
-
The Quality and Readability of English Wikipedia Anatomy Articles.
Suwannakhan A, Casanova-Martínez D, Yurasakpong L, Montriwat P, Meemon K, Limpanuparb T. Suwannakhan A, et al. Anat Sci Educ. 2020 Jul;13(4):475-487. doi: 10.1002/ase.1910. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Anat Sci Educ. 2020. PMID: 31233658
-
Wikipedia: a key tool for global public health promotion.
Heilman JM, Kemmann E, Bonert M, Chatterjee A, Ragar B, Beards GM, Iberri DJ, Harvey M, Thomas B, Stomp W, Martone MF, Lodge DJ, Vondracek A, de Wolff JF, Liber C, Grover SC, Vickers TJ, Meskó B, Laurent MR. Heilman JM, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 31;13(1):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1589. J Med Internet Res. 2011. PMID: 21282098 Free PMC article.
-
Sanz-Valero J, Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe R, Castiel LD. Sanz-Valero J, et al. Nutr Hosp. 2012 Nov;27 Suppl 2:54-8. doi: 10.4321/S0212-16112012000800008. Nutr Hosp. 2012. PMID: 23568398 Review. Spanish.
-
Wikipedia page views for health research: a review.
Alibudbud R. Alibudbud R. Front Big Data. 2023 Jul 4;6:1199060. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1199060. eCollection 2023. Front Big Data. 2023. PMID: 37469441 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Wikipedia in Vascular Surgery Medical Education: Comparative Study.
Yacob M, Lotfi S, Tang S, Jetty P. Yacob M, et al. JMIR Med Educ. 2020 Jun 19;6(1):e18076. doi: 10.2196/18076. JMIR Med Educ. 2020. PMID: 32417754 Free PMC article.
-
Wikipedia: Why is the common knowledge resource still neglected by academics?
Jemielniak D. Jemielniak D. Gigascience. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):giz139. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz139. Gigascience. 2019. PMID: 31794014 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond belief: a cross-genre study on perception and validation of health information online.
Zuo C, Mathur K, Kela D, Salek Faramarzi N, Banerjee R. Zuo C, et al. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022;13(4):299-314. doi: 10.1007/s41060-022-00310-7. Epub 2022 Feb 2. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022. PMID: 35128039 Free PMC article.
-
Singh R, Yadav N, Pandey M, Jones DG. Singh R, et al. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Jan;44(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02875-7. Epub 2022 Jan 7. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022. PMID: 34994829 Free PMC article.
-
Patra A, Asghar A, Chaudhary P, Ravi KS. Patra A, et al. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022 Jan;44(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s00276-021-02868-6. Epub 2022 Jan 8. Surg Radiol Anat. 2022. PMID: 34997275 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources