Dynamic Imprinting of the Treg Cell-Specific Epigenetic Signature in Developing Thymic Regulatory T Cells - PubMed
- ️Tue Jan 01 2019
Dynamic Imprinting of the Treg Cell-Specific Epigenetic Signature in Developing Thymic Regulatory T Cells
Susanne Herppich et al. Front Immunol. 2019.
Abstract
Regulatory T (Treg) cells mainly develop within the thymus and arise from CD25+Foxp3- (CD25+ TregP) or CD25-Foxp3+ (Foxp3+ TregP) Treg cell precursors resulting in Treg cells harboring distinct transcriptomic profiles and complementary T cell receptor repertoires. The stable and long-term expression of Foxp3 in Treg cells and their stable suppressive phenotype are controlled by the demethylation of Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature genes including an evolutionarily conserved CpG-rich element within the Foxp3 locus, the Treg-specific demethylated region (TSDR). Here we analyzed the dynamics of the imprinting of the Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature genes in thymic Treg cells. We could demonstrate that CD25+Foxp3+ Treg cells show a progressive demethylation of most signature genes during maturation within the thymus. Interestingly, a partial demethylation of several Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature genes was already observed in Foxp3+ TregP but not in CD25+ TregP. Furthermore, Foxp3+ TregP were very transient in nature and arose at a more mature developmental stage when compared to CD25+ TregP. When the two Treg cell precursors were cultured in presence of IL-2, a factor known to be critical for thymic Treg cell development, we observed a major impact of IL-2 on the demethylation of the TSDR with a more pronounced effect on Foxp3+ TregP. Together, these results suggest that the establishment of the Treg cell-specific hypomethylation pattern is a continuous process throughout thymic Treg cell development and that the two known Treg cell precursors display distinct dynamics for the imprinting of the Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature genes.
Keywords: Foxp3; IL-2; TSDR; Treg cell; Treg cell precursors; demethylation; epigenetic signature; thymus.
Copyright © 2019 Herppich, Toker, Pietzsch, Kitagawa, Ohkura, Miyao, Floess, Hori, Sakaguchi and Huehn.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ced/6797672/fb78106935b3/fimmu-10-02382-g0001.gif)
Newly generated CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ Treg cells progressively mature within the thymus. Thymocytes were isolated from Foxp3hCD2xRag1GFP reporter mice and analyzed by flow cytometry or prepared for subsequent methylation analysis. (A) Representative dot plots show the gating of CD4SP thymocytes among living cells (LD−, LIVE/DEAD−), newly generated RagGFP+ cells among CD4SP thymocytes, CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ Treg cells among RagGFP+CD4SP thymocytes, and CD24hi/int/low cells among CD25+Foxp3hCD2+RagGFP+CD4SP thymocytes. Numbers specify frequencies of cells in indicated gates. (B,C) (Left) Representative histograms depict the expression of CD25 (B) and Foxp3hCD2 (C) among CD24hi/int/low subsets of CD25+Foxp3hCD2+RagGFP+CD4SP thymocytes. (Right) Scatter plots summarize the data from three independent experiments and bars indicate mean ± SD. Each symbol represents an individual mouse. The significance was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test (**p < 0.01). Data are given relative to the maximal span (xmax-xmin) per experiment. (D,E) Genomic DNA was isolated from sorted CD24hi/int/low subsets of CD25+Foxp3hCD2+RagGFP+CD4SP thymocytes for analysis of the methylation status of TSDR, Helios, Eos, Ctla-4, and Gitr. Cells were pooled from four independent sorts. (D) Each bar represents an individual CpG motif. Percentage of methylation is color-coded according to the scale. (E) Bar graph summarizes changes in the CpG methylation ratio of the Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature genes in CD24hi/int/low subsets of CD25+Foxp3hCD2+RagGFP+CD4SP thymocytes (bars indicate mean ± SD of all CpG motifs). The significance was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ced/6797672/676e37ceec74/fimmu-10-02382-g0002.gif)
Foxp3+ TregP already display a partially demethylated Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature. (A,B) Thymocytes were isolated from Foxp3hCD2xRag1GFP reporter mice and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative dot plot shows the gating of CD25+Foxp3hCD2− (CD25+ TregP), CD25−Foxp3hCD2+ (Foxp3+ TregP), and CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ (Treg cells) cells among RagGFP+CD4SP thymocytes. Numbers specify frequencies of cells in indicated gates. (B) (Left) Representative histograms depict CD24 expression among CD25+ TregP, Foxp3+ TregP and Treg cells. (Right) Scatter plot summarizes the data from three independent experiments and bars indicate mean ± SD. Each symbol represents an individual mouse. The significance was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test (*p < 0.05; ****p < 0.0001). Data are given relative to the maximal span (xmax-xmin) per experiment. (C) Thymocytes were isolated from Foxp3GFPCrexROSA26RFP fate-mapping mice and analyzed by flow cytometry. (Left) Representative histograms depict RFP expression among CD25+ TregP, Foxp3+ TregP and Treg cells. (Right) Scatter plot summarizes the data from three independent experiments and bars indicate mean ± SD. Each symbol represents an individual mouse. The significance was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test (***p < 0.001). (D) Thymocytes were isolated from Foxp3hCD2 reporter mice, and indicated populations pre-gated on newly generated CD73lowCD4SP thymocytes were sorted. Genomic DNA was isolated from sorted cells for analysis of the methylation status of TSDR, Helios, Eos, Ctla-4, and Gitr. Cells were pooled from two independent sorts. Each bar represents an individual CpG motif. Percentage of methylation is color-coded according to the scale.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8ced/6797672/2ed0fe257750/fimmu-10-02382-g0003.gif)
CD25+ TregP and Foxp3+ TregP show distinct responsiveness toward IL-2. Thymocytes were isolated from Foxp3hCD2 reporter mice, CD25+ TregP and Foxp3+ TregP pre-gated on newly generated CD73lowCD4SP thymocytes were sorted, and sorted Treg cell precursors were cultured in the presence of rmIL-2. At day 3 or 5 of the culture, CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ Treg cells were FACS-sorted and analyzed by flow cytometry or prepared for subsequent methylation analysis. (A) (Left) Representative dot plots show the gating of CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ Treg cells from the indicated cultures. Numbers specify frequencies of cells in indicated gates. (Right) Scatter plot summarizes the data from six independent experiments and bars indicate mean ± SD. Each symbol represents an individual experiment. The significance was calculated using Mann-Whitney test (**p < 0.01). (B) (Left) Representative histograms depict Foxp3hCD2 expression among Treg cells sorted from indicated cultures. (Right) Scatter plots summarize the data from six independent experiments and bars indicate mean ± SD. Each symbol represents an individual experiment. The significance was calculated using Mann-Whitney test (ns = not significant; **p < 0.01). (C,D) Genomic DNA was isolated from sorted CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ Treg cells of the indicated cultures for analysis of the methylation status of TSDR, Helios, Eos, Ctla-4, and Gitr. Cells were pooled from six independent experiments. (C) Each bar represents an individual CpG motif. Percentage of methylation is color-coded according to the scale. (D) Bar graph summarizes changes in the CpG methylation ratio of the Treg cell-specific epigenetic signature genes in sorted Treg cell precursors (input) and sorted CD25+Foxp3hCD2+ Treg cells from the indicated cultures (bars indicate mean ± SD of all CpG motifs). The significance was calculated using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's test (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Similar articles
-
Thymic regulatory T cells arise via two distinct developmental programs.
Owen DL, Mahmud SA, Sjaastad LE, Williams JB, Spanier JA, Simeonov DR, Ruscher R, Huang W, Proekt I, Miller CN, Hekim C, Jeschke JC, Aggarwal P, Broeckel U, LaRue RS, Henzler CM, Alegre ML, Anderson MS, August A, Marson A, Zheng Y, Williams CB, Farrar MA. Owen DL, et al. Nat Immunol. 2019 Feb;20(2):195-205. doi: 10.1038/s41590-018-0289-6. Epub 2019 Jan 14. Nat Immunol. 2019. PMID: 30643267 Free PMC article.
-
Owen DL, La Rue RS, Munro SA, Farrar MA. Owen DL, et al. J Immunol. 2022 Oct 1;209(7):1300-1313. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200089. Epub 2022 Aug 29. J Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36038290 Free PMC article.
-
Garg G, Nikolouli E, Hardtke-Wolenski M, Toker A, Ohkura N, Beckstette M, Miyao T, Geffers R, Floess S, Gerdes N, Lutgens E, Osterloh A, Hori S, Sakaguchi S, Jaeckel E, Huehn J. Garg G, et al. Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(22):35542-35557. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16221. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 28415767 Free PMC article.
-
Epigenetic control of thymic Treg-cell development.
Kitagawa Y, Ohkura N, Sakaguchi S. Kitagawa Y, et al. Eur J Immunol. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-6. doi: 10.1002/eji.201444577. Epub 2014 Nov 20. Eur J Immunol. 2015. PMID: 25348287 Review.
-
Ohkura N, Sakaguchi S. Ohkura N, et al. Cell Res. 2020 Jun;30(6):465-474. doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0324-7. Epub 2020 May 4. Cell Res. 2020. PMID: 32367041 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Deciphering the developmental trajectory of tissue-resident Foxp3+ regulatory T cells.
Alvarez F, Liu Z, Bay A, Piccirillo CA. Alvarez F, et al. Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1331846. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1331846. eCollection 2024. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38605970 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Adoptive Transfer of Regulatory Immune Cells in Organ Transplantation.
Oberholtzer N, Atkinson C, Nadig SN. Oberholtzer N, et al. Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 2;12:631365. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.631365. eCollection 2021. Front Immunol. 2021. PMID: 33737934 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Regulatory T Cells-Related Genes Are under DNA Methylation Influence.
Piotrowska M, Gliwiński M, Trzonkowski P, Iwaszkiewicz-Grzes D. Piotrowska M, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 1;22(13):7144. doi: 10.3390/ijms22137144. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. PMID: 34281195 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Thymic origins of autoimmunity-lessons from inborn errors of immunity.
Bacchetta R, Weinberg K. Bacchetta R, et al. Semin Immunopathol. 2021 Feb;43(1):65-83. doi: 10.1007/s00281-020-00835-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Semin Immunopathol. 2021. PMID: 33532929 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Stepwise acquisition of unique epigenetic signatures during differentiation of tissue Treg cells.
Braband KL, Kaufmann T, Floess S, Zou M, Huehn J, Delacher M. Braband KL, et al. Front Immunol. 2022 Dec 8;13:1082055. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1082055. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36569861 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources