pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Misophonia: Phenomenology, comorbidity and demographics in a large sample - PubMed

  • ️Wed Jan 01 2020

Misophonia: Phenomenology, comorbidity and demographics in a large sample

Inge Jager et al. PLoS One. 2020.

Abstract

Objective: Analyze a large sample with detailed clinical data of misophonia subjects in order to determine the psychiatric, somatic and psychological nature of the condition.

Methods: This observational study of 779 subjects with suspected misophonia was conducted from January 2013 to May 2017 at the outpatient-clinic of the Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location AMC, the Netherlands. We examined DSM-IV diagnoses, results of somatic examination (general screening and hearing tests), and 17 psychological questionnaires (e.g., SCL-90-R, WHOQoL).

Results: The diagnosis of misophonia was confirmed in 575 of 779 referred subjects (74%). In the sample of misophonia subjects (mean age, 34.17 [SD = 12.22] years; 399 women [69%]), 148 (26%) subjects had comorbid traits of obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, 58 (10%) mood disorders, 31 (5%) attention-deficit (hyperactivity) disorder, and 14 (3%) autism spectrum conditions. Two percent reported tinnitus and 1% hyperacusis. In a random subgroup of 109 subjects we performed audiometry, and found unilateral hearing loss in 3 of them (3%). Clinical neurological examination and additional blood test showed no abnormalities. Psychological tests revealed perfectionism (97% CPQ>25) and neuroticism (stanine 7 NEO-PI-R). Quality of life was heavily impaired and associated with misophonia severity (rs (184) = -.34 p = < .001, p = < .001).

Limitations: This was a single site study, leading to possible selection-and confirmation bias, since AMC-criteria were used.

Conclusions: This study with 575 subjects is the largest misophonia sample ever described. Based on these results we propose a set of revised criteria useful to diagnose misophonia as a psychiatric disorder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Triggers and provoked anger for misophonia subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jastreboff MM, Jastreboff PJ. Components of decreased sound tolerance: hyperacusis, misophonia and phonophobia. ITHS Newsletter. 2001;2:5–7.
    1. Schroder A, Vulink N, Denys D. Misophonia: Diagnostic Criteria for a New Psychiatric Disorder. PLOSONE. 2013;8 (1):e54706. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor S. Misophonia: A new mental disorder? Med Hypotheses. 2017;103:109–117. 10.1016/j.mehy.2017.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brout JJ, Edelstein M, Erfanian M, et al. Investigating Misophonia: A Review of the Empirical Literature, Clinical Implications, and a Research Agenda. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu MS, Lewin AB, Murphy TK, Storch EA. Misophonia: Incidence, phenomenology, and clinical correlates in an undergraduate student sample. J Clin Psychol. 2014;70(10):994–1007. 10.1002/jclp.22098 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.