Identifying the optimal course delivery platform in an undergraduate animal behavior research course - PubMed

Affiliations

• PMID: 32704714
• PMCID: PMC7200508
• DOI: 10.1093/tas/txy066

Identifying the optimal course delivery platform in an undergraduate animal behavior research course

Danielle M Arnold et al. Transl Anim Sci. 2018.

Abstract

There is a critical need to evaluate pedagogical delivery platforms best suited for undergraduates in the information age. Our goal was to identify the optimum course delivery platform for a basic research course based on student performance and critical thinking scores. Students were expected to plan, conduct, and report on an animal behavior research project of their own design. The course was taught in three different formats: traditional, online, and flipped, over 2 yr by the same instructor at both the University of Florida and Santa Fe College. Student assessments included weekly quizzes, assignments, a written report, a poster presentation, and attendance. We conducted pre- and postassessments using the Cornell Critical Thinking Test (CCTT). Students' grades differed depending on format delivery and were also different between University of Florida and Santa Fe College students. For students at the University of Florida, quiz grades and poster grades did not differ (P < 0.50) between formats. However, assignment grades (P = 0.04) and report grades (P < 0.001) differed by format and were higher in the flipped and online-only version of the course, compared with traditional. For students at the Santa Fe College, quiz grades (P = 0.71) did not differ, but assignment (P < 0.001), report (P = 0.003), and poster (P < 0.001) grades were higher in the flipped and traditional format of the course. Within the flipped format at the University of Florida, student CCTT scores increased (P < 0.001) between pre- and posttest, whereas the scores within the other formats did not differ. When we compared the magnitude of change between pre- and posttest scores across formats, students at the University of Florida in the flipped format tended (P = 0.060) to have a greater gain than students in the online format. For students at Santa Fe College, there was no difference between pre- and posttest CCTT scores for any format, and the magnitude of change in scores did not differ between formats. Overall, our results suggest that teaching format influences student grades and critical thinking scores. Different effects were seen in different student populations; however, positive effects of the flipped format on student grades were seen at both institutions. In conclusion, flipped format courses may improve learning and critical thinking in an early research-based course.

Keywords: animal behavior; critical thinking; flipped classroom; research; undergraduate education.

Similar articles

• The flipped classroom stimulates greater learning and is a modern 21st century approach to teaching today's undergraduates.

  Mortensen CJ, Nicholson AM. Mortensen CJ, et al. J Anim Sci. 2015 Jul;93(7):3722-31. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9087. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26440038

• The flipped classroom allows for more class time devoted to critical thinking.

  DeRuisseau LR. DeRuisseau LR. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016 Dec 1;40(4):522-528. doi: 10.1152/advan.00033.2016. Adv Physiol Educ. 2016. PMID: 28145270

• Using the Flipped Classroom to Bridge the Gap to Generation Y.

  Gillispie V. Gillispie V. Ochsner J. 2016 Spring;16(1):32-6. Ochsner J. 2016. PMID: 27046401 Free PMC article.

• The quest for knowledge transfer efficacy: blended teaching, online and in-class, with consideration of learning typologies for non-traditional and traditional students.

  Van Doorn JR, Van Doorn JD. Van Doorn JR, et al. Front Psychol. 2014 Apr 17;5:324. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00324. eCollection 2014. Front Psychol. 2014. PMID: 24860517 Free PMC article. Review.

• Flipped Classroom Formats in a Problem-Based Learning Course: Experiences of First-Year Bachelor European Public Health Students.

  de Jong N, van Rosmalen P, Brancaccio MT, Bleijlevens MHC, Verbeek H, Peeters IGP. de Jong N, et al. Public Health Rev. 2022 Aug 4;43:1604795. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604795. eCollection 2022. Public Health Rev. 2022. PMID: 35992752 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

• Animal sciences undergraduate education since the ASAS centennial: a national survey and scoping review.

  Erickson MG, Ranathunga SD, Wattiaux MA. Erickson MG, et al. Transl Anim Sci. 2020 Nov 7;4(4):txaa202. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaa202. eCollection 2020 Oct. Transl Anim Sci. 2020. PMID: 33336155 Free PMC article.

References

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Europe PubMed Central
  • PubMed Central