Digital Health Coaching Programs Among Older Employees in Transition to Retirement: Systematic Literature Review - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2020
Review
. 2020 Sep 24;22(9):e17809.
doi: 10.2196/17809.
Affiliations
- PMID: 32969827
- PMCID: PMC7545329
- DOI: 10.2196/17809
Review
Digital Health Coaching Programs Among Older Employees in Transition to Retirement: Systematic Literature Review
Vera Stara et al. J Med Internet Res. 2020.
Erratum in
-
Stara V, Santini S, Kropf J, D'Amen B. Stara V, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 14;22(12):e25065. doi: 10.2196/25065. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 33315575 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Background: The rapid increase of the aging population is pushing many national governments to reshape retirement legislation in order to extend older adults' working life. Once retired, older adults can be invaluable resources for the community as family carers, as volunteers, or by returning to work. Healthy aging is one of the main conditions for being able to work longer and being active after retirement. The latter, indeed, represents a very sensitive life transition, which can entail psychological and social difficulties. Interventions for promoting older workers' health and well-being and supporting the transition to retirement are on the top of the policy agenda of most European countries. Recently, computer-based and digital health interventions have been seen as promising means to reach this purpose.
Objective: This systematic literature review aimed to explore studies on digital health coaching programs for older workers that followed a user-centered design approach and evaluated their effectiveness in providing older adults with guidance for adopting a healthy lifestyle and being active in the community.
Methods: The search identified 1931 papers, and 2 relevant articles were selected by applying specific eligibility criteria.
Results: To our knowledge, only few digital health coaching programs have targeted the population of older workers to date; there is an insufficient number of studies on the efficacy of such programs. The results show the difficulties of assessing the efficacy of digital coaching itself and with respect to older employees. The 2 studies suggest that digital health programs for workplaces can improve various aspects of older employees' well-being; however, they considered health mainly from a physical perspective and neglected contextual, social, psychological, and cultural factors that can influence older workers' health and general well-being. Future digital health coaching programs should adopt the healthy aging paradigm as a multidimensional lens for interpreting the impact of eHealth technology on aging and retirement. The literature around this issue remains at an embryonic state, and this gap needs to be filled by further investigations that apply a user-centered approach for designing the technology, test innovative research methodologies, and adopt new technical solutions for high-quality interaction design.
Conclusions: Further digital health coaching programs aimed at supporting healthy and active living for older workers and retirees are necessary. The user-centered design approach is recommended in order to fully address the users' health needs and the technological requirements throughout development. Moreover, the healthy aging perspective allows inclusion of physical, social, and psychological factors influencing the transition from work to retirement, as well as the experiences and interactions of individuals with the technology.
Keywords: active aging; avatar, virtual personal assistant; digital coach; healthy aging; older workers; retirees; transition to retirement; user-centered design; virtual agent; virtual coach.
©Vera Stara, Sara Santini, Johannes Kropf, Barbara D'Amen. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 24.09.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Santini S, Stara V, Galassi F, Merizzi A, Schneider C, Schwammer S, Stolte E, Kropf J. Santini S, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 14;18(18):9681. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189681. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34574615 Free PMC article.
-
Teh PL, Kwok AOJ, Cheong WL, Lee S. Teh PL, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2024 May 21;8:e54101. doi: 10.2196/54101. JMIR Form Res. 2024. PMID: 38772022 Free PMC article.
-
Santini S, Fabbietti P, Galassi F, Merizzi A, Kropf J, Hungerländer N, Stara V. Santini S, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4034. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054034. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36901045 Free PMC article.
-
Loureiro H, Mendes A, Rodrigues R, Apóstolo J, Rodrigues MA, Cardoso D, Pedreiro AT. Loureiro H, et al. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):276-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1754. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447082 Review.
-
Baxter S, Blank L, Johnson M, Everson-Hock E, Woods HB, Goyder E, Payne N, Mountain G. Baxter S, et al. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Apr. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Apr. PMID: 27148615 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Digital Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older People: Scoping Review.
De Santis KK, Mergenthal L, Christianson L, Busskamp A, Vonstein C, Zeeb H. De Santis KK, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 23;25:e43542. doi: 10.2196/43542. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 36951896 Free PMC article.
-
Gajewski PD, Stahn C, Zülch J, Wascher E, Getzmann S, Falkenstein M. Gajewski PD, et al. Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 12;14:1229503. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1229503. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37771815 Free PMC article.
-
Gajewski PD, Rieker JA, Athanassiou G, Bröde P, Claus M, Golka K, Hengstler JG, Kleinsorge T, Nitsche MA, Reinders J, Tisch A, Watzl C, Wascher E, Getzmann S. Gajewski PD, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2023 May 19;7:e40818. doi: 10.2196/40818. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37204831 Free PMC article.
-
Mezuk B, Dang L, Jurgens D, Smith J. Mezuk B, et al. Gerontologist. 2022 Nov 30;62(10):1454-1465. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac110. Gerontologist. 2022. PMID: 35914806 Free PMC article.
-
Methods for Human-Centered eHealth Development: Narrative Scoping Review.
Kip H, Keizer J, da Silva MC, Beerlage-de Jong N, Köhle N, Kelders SM. Kip H, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e31858. doi: 10.2196/31858. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 35084359 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Population Prospects 2019. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Dynamics. [2019-09-18]. https://population.un.org/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2019_DataBooklet.
-
- McCarthy J, Heraty N, Cross C, Cleveland J. Who is considered an ‘older worker'? extending our conceptualisation of ‘older’ from an organisational decision maker perspective. Human Resource Management Journal. 2014 May 27;24(4):374–393. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12041. doi: 10.1111/1748-8583.12041. - DOI - DOI
-
- Employment statistics. Eurostat. [2019-09-21]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Employment_....
-
- Employment rate: aged 55-64: all persons for the United States. FRED Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis. [2020-06-24]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LREM55TTUSM156S.
-
- Wang M, Shultz KS. Employee retirement: a review and recommendations for future investigation. Journal of Management. 2009 Oct 06;36(1):172–206. doi: 10.1177/0149206309347957. - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous