PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2020
Meta-Analysis
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
Amand F Schmidt et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020.
Abstract
Background: Despite the availability of effective drug therapies that reduce low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C), cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity. Therefore, additional LDL-C reduction may be warranted, especially for people who are unresponsive to, or unable to take, existing LDL-C-reducing therapies. By inhibiting the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) enzyme, monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9 inhibitors) reduce LDL-C and CVD risk.
Objectives: Primary To quantify the effects of PCSK9 inhibitors on CVD, all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke, compared to placebo or active treatment(s) for primary and secondary prevention. Secondary To quantify the safety of PCSK9 inhibitors, with specific focus on the incidence of influenza, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and cancer, compared to placebo or active treatment(s) for primary and secondary prevention.
Search methods: We identified studies by systematically searching CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science in December 2019. We also searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform in August 2020 and screened the reference lists of included studies. This is an update of the review first published in 2017.
Selection criteria: All parallel-group and factorial randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow-up of at least 24 weeks were eligible.
Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently reviewed and extracted data. Where data were available, we calculated pooled effect estimates. We used GRADE to assess certainty of evidence and in 'Summary of findings' tables.
Main results: We included 24 studies with data on 60,997 participants. Eighteen trials randomised participants to alirocumab and six to evolocumab. All participants received background lipid-lowering treatment or lifestyle counselling. Six alirocumab studies used an active treatment comparison group (the remaining used placebo), compared to three evolocumab active comparison trials. Alirocumab compared with placebo decreased the risk of CVD events, with an absolute risk difference (RD) of -2% (odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.80 to 0.94; 10 studies, 23,868 participants; high-certainty evidence), decreased the risk of mortality (RD -1%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.96; 12 studies, 24,797 participants; high-certainty evidence), and MI (RD -2%; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.94; 9 studies, 23,352 participants; high-certainty evidence) and for any stroke (RD 0%; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.91; 8 studies, 22,835 participants; high-certainty evidence). Compared to active treatment the alirocumab effects, for CVD, the RD was 1% (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.87; 3 studies, 1379 participants; low-certainty evidence); for mortality, RD was -1% (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.40; 5 studies, 1333 participants; low-certainty evidence); for MI, RD was 1% (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.64 to 3.28, 5 studies, 1734 participants; low-certainty evidence); and for any stroke, RD was less than 1% (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.13 to 5.61; 5 studies, 1734 participants; low-certainty evidence). Compared to placebo the evolocumab, for CVD, the RD was -2% (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.91; 3 studies, 29,432 participants; high-certainty evidence); for mortality, RD was less than 1% (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.19; 3 studies, 29,432 participants; high-certainty evidence); for MI, RD was -1% (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.82; 3 studies, 29,432 participants; high-certainty evidence); and for any stroke RD was less than -1% (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94; 2 studies, 28,531 participants; high-certainty evidence). Compared to active treatment, the evolocumab effects, for any CVD event RD was less than -1% (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.04; 1 study, 218 participants; very low-certainty evidence); for all-cause mortality, the RD was less than 1% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.30; 3 studies, 5223 participants; very low-certainty evidence); and for MI, RD was less than 1% (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.85; 3 studies, 5003 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There were insufficient data on any stroke. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence for the clinical endpoint effects of evolocumab and alirocumab were graded as high. There is a strong evidence base to prescribe PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies to people who might not be eligible for other lipid-lowering drugs, or to people who cannot meet their lipid goals on more traditional therapies, which was the main patient population of the available trials. The evidence base of PCSK9 inhibitors compared with active treatment is much weaker (low very- to low-certainty evidence) and it is unclear whether evolocumab or alirocumab might be effectively used as replacement therapies. Related, most of the available studies preferentially enrolled people with either established CVD or at a high risk already, and evidence in low- to medium-risk settings is minimal. Finally, there is very limited evidence on any potential safety issues of both evolocumab and alirocumab. While the current evidence synthesis does not reveal any adverse signals, neither does it provide evidence against such signals. This suggests careful consideration of alternative lipid lowering treatments before prescribing PCSK9 inhibitors.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01764633 NCT01984424 NCT01813422 NCT02642159 NCT02585778 NCT02107898 NCT02289963 NCT01663402 NCT01854918 NCT02729025 NCT02207634 NCT02392559 NCT01624142 NCT02833844.
Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
AFS has received unrelated funding from Servier for the development of a genetically guided drug target validation platform. Servier does not produce a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody drug.
JPLC: none.
LSP: none.
JTW: none.
JPO: none.
AH is a member of the organisation committee of The Genetics of Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease Consortium and the Heart failure Molecular Epidemiology for Therapeutic Targets Consortium (HERMES) each comprising over 20 member cohorts. A number of Pharma companies have provided direct and in‐kind support for these initiatives, but AH is not a direct recipient of any of these funds.
JPC: none.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cda16/cda1631dba90172911aa38b2737732a8e0219ec0" alt="1"
Study flow diagram. RCT: randomised controlled trial.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f75a/6f75ae63354288ceeef17775b43f3ae8b67267b5" alt="2"
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1fa3/d1fa3620580c14154c4ebdd95d0eee769b0341b0" alt="3"
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6de5b/6de5bcee7e1627edd9f5530a1cdf24dbb1cc2dc8" alt="4"
A funnel plot of the alirocumab versus placebo cardiovascular disease effects.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54eea/54eea077d189d081c082ed032d7763c379530636" alt="5"
A funnel plot of the alirocumab versus placebo influenza effects.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdf71/fdf7169e88419a4be68e2cf49d7020b2160542cb" alt="1.1"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 1: Any cardiovascular disease
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7637/b763714e00f5be1f8671ed445efd390779923b1a" alt="1.2"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 2: All‐cause mortality
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ef34/8ef348dd538bc8dd803ed0f6198c22c4e7c5ad54" alt="1.3"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 3: Any myocardial infarction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b07ba/b07ba10f8e7517abf58be60226606748aec1976c" alt="1.4"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 4: Any stroke
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51f2b/51f2b9154ae49fb78d3aafedc555a4fadc326b11" alt="1.5"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 5: Influenza
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07efd/07efdee286f4a24361919d69e5a603d65b86d31e" alt="1.6"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 6: Type 2 diabetes mellitus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/18065/1806578b494083b67956ef4c46649398149ad038" alt="1.7"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 7: Any cancer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/899c2/899c2deb90090eec8f0286a792a0559dc22e1b0e" alt="1.8"
Comparison 1: Alirocumab versus placebo, Outcome 8: Hypertension
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0507/c05075baf51b61dc3fb5f89167dc9c69804531fa" alt="2.1"
Comparison 2: Evolocumab versus placebo, Outcome 1: Any cardiovascular disease
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92ca9/92ca9c37f5596c50173767af779677cc06c67751" alt="2.2"
Comparison 2: Evolocumab versus placebo, Outcome 2: All‐cause mortality
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5b17c/5b17c2b598e829b955ffd28ac2a4f79addfed4b0" alt="2.3"
Comparison 2: Evolocumab versus placebo, Outcome 3: Any myocardial infarction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1bc1/d1bc106120befac07cbe91eef54dcfbc77821767" alt="2.4"
Comparison 2: Evolocumab versus placebo, Outcome 4: Any stroke
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/506a9/506a93a3f64aa86175ebadbddbf4b329c2b03eb3" alt="2.5"
Comparison 2: Evolocumab versus placebo, Outcome 5: Influenza
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43ae3/43ae3b40e99493fc1d58de7b1513afd58e8c998b" alt="2.6"
Comparison 2: Evolocumab versus placebo, Outcome 6: Type 2 diabetes mellitus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecf38/ecf3866f9c9f48ffde730d9994c8321630465a37" alt="3.1"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 1: Any cardiovascular disease
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/16166/1616615c08572f1c41145a0c9fb1cc814b00ec8a" alt="3.2"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 2: All‐cause mortality
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/193a0/193a095d63aefd425d7274bb80b5a233f17de80f" alt="3.3"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 3: Any myocardial infarction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/852e2/852e218c5e8748e34b5a6417c10c681dc05f1909" alt="3.4"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 4: Any stroke
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5478b/5478b2e75e23f15d05c88e4f2e15035c976290ec" alt="3.5"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 5: Influenza
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f812/2f812f5d4be201210fecf2bb00ebb02fc5f28e5e" alt="3.6"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 6: Type 2 diabetes mellitus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd891/cd89185942992aee94991de8b629c2cbbb4cf1cd" alt="3.7"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 7: Any cancer
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/565da/565da6a6dfbcf9219bf90ac52bede5a07561c87d" alt="3.8"
Comparison 3: Alirocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 8: Hypertension
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/510bc/510bc1fef4c49748ee27bf3078aa140af2d2044f" alt="4.1"
Comparison 4: Evolocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 1: Any cardiovascular disease
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8518b/8518ba2a7ddc10fe6a2bcb07b76a0e9d70faf996" alt="4.2"
Comparison 4: Evolocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 2: All‐cause mortality
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c48e2/c48e2e70eedf22c9af8a006d3f2da1a140136d5f" alt="4.3"
Comparison 4: Evolocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 3: Any myocardial infarction
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be968/be968718f228d1245732cb072cf956db3ab5eb72" alt="4.4"
Comparison 4: Evolocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 4: Influenza
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d158c/d158ca3ba2d4c502a39efd4157437ddf7cc174f2" alt="4.5"
Comparison 4: Evolocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 5: Type 2 diabetes mellitus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f72db/f72db685eceb097ab2548a1ace5005547a3b237d" alt="4.6"
Comparison 4: Evolocumab versus active therapy, Outcome 6: Hypertension
Update of
-
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Schmidt AF, Pearce LS, Wilkins JT, Overington JP, Hingorani AD, Casas JP. Schmidt AF, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 28;4(4):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28453187 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Similar articles
-
PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.
Schmidt AF, Pearce LS, Wilkins JT, Overington JP, Hingorani AD, Casas JP. Schmidt AF, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 28;4(4):CD011748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28453187 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
-
Ezetimibe for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality events.
Zhan S, Tang M, Liu F, Xia P, Shu M, Wu X. Zhan S, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 19;11(11):CD012502. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012502.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30480766 Free PMC article.
-
Imran TF, Khan AA, Has P, Jacobson A, Bogin S, Khalid M, Khan A, Kim S, Erqou S, Choudhary G, Aspry K, Wu WC. Imran TF, et al. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 6;18(12):e0295359. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295359. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38055686 Free PMC article.
-
Toth PP, Worthy G, Gandra SR, Sattar N, Bray S, Cheng LI, Bridges I, Worth GM, Dent R, Forbes CA, Deshpande S, Ross J, Kleijnen J, Stroes ESG. Toth PP, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 2;6(10):e005367. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.005367. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017. PMID: 28971955 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hao Q, Aertgeerts B, Guyatt G, Bekkering GE, Vandvik PO, Khan SU, Rodondi N, Jackson R, Reny JL, Al Ansary L, Van Driel M, Assendelft WJJ, Agoritsas T, Spencer F, Siemieniuk RAC, Lytvyn L, Heen AF, Zhao Q, Riaz IB, Ramaekers D, Okwen PM, Zhu Y, Dawson A, Ovidiu MC, Vanbrabant W, Li S, Delvaux N. Hao Q, et al. BMJ. 2022 May 4;377:e069066. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069066. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35508320
Cited by
-
Phenome-wide association analysis of LDL-cholesterol lowering genetic variants in PCSK9.
Schmidt AF, Holmes MV, Preiss D, Swerdlow DI, Denaxas S, Fatemifar G, Faraway R, Finan C, Valentine D, Fairhurst-Hunter Z, Hartwig FP, Horta BL, Hypponen E, Power C, Moldovan M, van Iperen E, Hovingh K, Demuth I, Norman K, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Demuth J, Bertram L, Lill CM, Coassin S, Willeit J, Kiechl S, Willeit K, Mason D, Wright J, Morris R, Wanamethee G, Whincup P, Ben-Shlomo Y, McLachlan S, Price JF, Kivimaki M, Welch C, Sanchez-Galvez A, Marques-Vidal P, Nicolaides A, Panayiotou AG, Onland-Moret NC, van der Schouw YT, Matullo G, Fiorito G, Guarrera S, Sacerdote C, Wareham NJ, Langenberg C, Scott RA, Luan J, Bobak M, Malyutina S, Pająk A, Kubinova R, Tamosiunas A, Pikhart H, Grarup N, Pedersen O, Hansen T, Linneberg A, Jess T, Cooper J, Humphries SE, Brilliant M, Kitchner T, Hakonarson H, Carrell DS, McCarty CA, Lester KH, Larson EB, Crosslin DR, de Andrade M, Roden DM, Denny JC, Carty C, Hancock S, Attia J, Holliday E, Scott R, Schofield P, O'Donnell M, Yusuf S, Chong M, Pare G, van der Harst P, Said MA, Eppinga RN, Verweij N, Snieder H; Lifelines Cohort authors; Christen T, Mook-Kanamori DO; ICBP Consortium; Gustafsson S, Lind L, Ingelsson E, Pazoki R, Franco O, Hofman A, … See abstract for full author list ➔ Schmidt AF, et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 29;19(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1187-z. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019. PMID: 31664920 Free PMC article.
-
Kwok MK, Schooling CM. Kwok MK, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Dec 19;12(24):e030943. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030943. Epub 2023 Dec 18. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023. PMID: 38108247 Free PMC article.
-
Mohammadi KA, Brackin T, Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Manvelian G, Pordy R, Fazio S, Geba GP. Mohammadi KA, et al. Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(16):16859-16868. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6310. Epub 2023 Jul 17. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 37458138 Free PMC article.
-
C Thambiah S, Lai LC. C Thambiah S, et al. Pract Lab Med. 2021 Jul 18;26:e00248. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00248. eCollection 2021 Aug. Pract Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 34368411 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Li X, Hong J, Gao X, Wang M, Yang N. Li X, et al. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 16;12(1):12211. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16453-3. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 35842473 Free PMC article.
References
References to studies included in this review
Descartes {published data only}
-
- Blom DJ, Hala T, Bolognese M, Lillestol MJ, Toth PD, Burgess L, et al. A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;370:1809-19. - PubMed
FOURIER {published data only}
-
- Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, Honarpour N, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, et al. Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;376(18):1713-22. - PubMed
GAUSS‐3 {published data only}
-
- Nissen SE, Stroes E, Dent-Acosta RE, Rosenson RS, Lehman SJ, Sattar N, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of evolocumab vs ezetimibein patients with muscle-related statin intolerance: the GAUSS-3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315(15):1580-90. - PubMed
GLAGOV {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, Ballantyne CM, Cho L, Kastelein JJ, et al. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin-treated patients: the GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;316(22):2373-84. - PubMed
-
- Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, Ballantyne CM, Cho L, Katelein JJ, et al. Effect of evolocumab on coronary plaque composition. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2018;72(17):2012-22. - PubMed
ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE {published data only}
-
- Moriarty PM, Thompson PD, Cannon CP, Guyton JR, Bergeron J, Zieve FJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab vs ezetimibe in statin-intolerant patients, with a statin rechallenge arm: the ODYSSEY ALTERNATIVE randomized trial. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2015;9(6):758-69. - PubMed
ODYSSEY CHOICE I {published data only}
-
- Roth EM, Moriarty PM, Bergeron J, Langslet G, Manvelian G, Zhao J, et al. A phase III randomized trial evaluating alirocumab 300 mg every 4 weeks as monotherapy or add-on to statin: ODYSSEY CHOICE I. Atherosclerosis 2016;1:254-62. - PubMed
-
- Stroes E, Guyton JR, Farnier M, Rader D, Moriarty PM, Bergeron J, et al. Efficacy and safety of 150 mg and 300 mg every 3 weeks in patients with poorly controlled hypercholesterolemia: the ODYSSEY CHOICE I and CHOICE II studies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015;5:99.1.
ODYSSEY CHOICE II {published data only}
-
- Stroes E, Guyton JR, Farnier M, Rader D, Moriarty PM, Bergeron J, et al. Efficacy and safety of 150 mg and 300 mg every 3 weeks in patients with poorly controlled hypercholesterolemia: the ODYSSEY CHOICE I and CHOICE II studies. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015;5:99.1.
ODYSSEY COMBO I {published data only}
-
- Kereiakes DJ, Robinson JG, Cannon CP, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, Chaudhari U, et al. Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitor alirocumab among high cardiovascular risk patients on maximally tolerated statin therapy: the ODYSSEY COMBO I study. American Heart Journal 2015;169(6):906. - PubMed
ODYSSEY COMBO II {published data only}
-
- Cannon CP, Cariou B, Blom D, McKenney JM, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients with inadequately controlled hypercholesterolaemia on maximally tolerated doses of statins: the ODYSSEY COMBO II randomized controlled trial. European Heart Journal 2015;36(19):1186-94. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Shahawy ME, Cannon CP, Blim DJ, McKenney JM, Cariou B, Lecorps G, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab versus ezetimibe over 2 years (from ODYSSEY COMBO II). American Journal of Cardiology 2017;120:931-9. - PubMed
-
- Shaway ME, Cannon C, Blom D, McKenney J, Cariou B, Lecorps G, et al. Alirocumab versus ezetimibe over 104 weeks in individuals with hypercholesterolemia and high cardiovascular risk: final results from ODYSSEY COMBO II. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2016;10:717-8.
ODYSSEY DM‐DYSLIPIDEMIA {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Ray KK, Leiter LA, Muller-Wieland D, Cariou B, Colhoun HM, Henry RR, et al. Alirocumab vs usual lipid-lowering care as add-on to statin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidaemia: the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA randomized trial. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2018;20:1479-89. - PMC - PubMed
ODYSSEY DM‐INSULIN {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Leiter LA, Cariou B, Muller-Wieland D, Colhoun HM, Prato SD, Tinahones FJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in insulin-treated individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk: the ODYSSEY DM-INSULIN randomized trial. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2017;19:1781-92. - PMC - PubMed
ODYSSEY FH I {published data only}
-
- Kastelein JJ, Hovingh GK, Langslet G, Baccara-Dinet MT, Gipe DA, Chaudhari U, et al. Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertasesubtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibody alirocumab vs placebo in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2017;11:195-203. - PubMed
ODYSSEY FH II {published data only}
-
- Kastelein JJ, Hovingh GK, Langslet G, Baccara-Dinet MT, Gipe DA, Chaudhari U, et al. Efficacy and safety of the proprotein convertasesubtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibody alirocumab vs placebo in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2017;11:195-203. - PubMed
ODYSSEY HIGH FH {published data only}
-
- Ginsberg HN, Rader DJ, Raal F, Guyton JR, Lorenzato C, Pordy R, et al. ODYSSEY HIGH FH: efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. www.resource.heartonline.cn/20150520/2_NaN0BW2.pdf (accessed online 2014).
ODYSSEY JAPAN {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Teramoto T, Kobayashi M, Tasaki H, Yagyu H, Higashikata T, Takagi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in Japanese patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia or at high cardiovascular risk with hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with statins – ODYSSEY JAPAN randomized controlled trial. Circulation Journal 2016;80:1980-7. - PubMed
ODYSSEY KT {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Koh KK, Nam CW, Chao TH, Liu ME, Wu CJ, Kim DS, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in high cardiovascular risk patients with hypercholesterolemia not adequately controlled with their lipid modifying therapy in South Korea and Taiwan. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2017;69(11):1664.
-
- Koh KK, Nam CW, Chao TH, Liu ME, Wu CJ, Kim DS, et al. A randomized trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of alirocumab in South Korea and Taiwan (ODYSSEY KT). Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2018;12(1):162-72. - PubMed
ODYSSEY Long Term {published data only}
-
- Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, Bergeron J, Luc G, Averna M, et al. Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;372(16):1489-99. - PubMed
ODYSSEY MONO {published data only}
-
- Roth EM, Taskinen MR, Ginsberg HN, Kastelein JJ, Colhoun HM, Robinson JG, et al. Monotherapy with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab versus ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a 24 week, double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. International Journal of Cardiology 2014;176:55-61. - PubMed
ODYSSEY OPTIONS I {published data only}
ODYSSEY OPTIONS II {published data only}
-
- Farnier M, Jones P, Severance R, Averna M, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Colhoun HM, et al. Efficacy and safety of adding alirocumab to rosuvastatin versus adding ezetimibe or doubling the rosuvastatin dose in high cardiovascular-risk patients: the ODYSSEY OPTIONS II randomized trial. Atherosclerosis 2016;244:138-46. - PubMed
ODYSSEY OUTCOMES {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, Bhatt DL, Bittner RD, Edelberg JM, et al. Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine 2018;379(22):2097-107. - PubMed
OSLER‐1 {published data only}
-
- Koren M, Sabatine M, Giugliano R, Langslet G, Wiviott S, Ruzza A, et al. Final report of the OSLER-1 study: long-term evolocumab for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2019;13:e53-e54.
-
- Koren MJ, Giugliano RP, Raal FJ, Sullivan D, Bolognese M, Langslet G, et al. Efficacy and safety of longer-term administration of evolocumab (AMG 145) in patients with hypercholesterolemia: 52-week results from the open-label study of long-term evaluation against LDL-C (OSLER) randomized trial. Circulation 2014;129:234-43. - PubMed
OSLER‐2 {published and unpublished data}
-
- NCT01854918. Open-label extension study of evolocumab (AMG 145) in adults with hyperlipidemia and mixed dyslipidemia. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01854918 (first received 16 May 2013). [CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT01854918]
Sugizaki 2019 {published data only}
-
- Sugizaki Y, Otake H, Kawamori H, Toba T, Nagasawa A, Onishi H, et al. Alirocumab improve coronary plaque vulnerability: first randomized control trial to assess the effect of alirocumab for plaque vulnerability using optical coherence tomography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2019;74:B13.
References to studies excluded from this review
ANITSCHKOW {published data only}
-
- NCT02729025. Effects of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition on arterial wall inflammation study in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). (ANITSCHKOW). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02729025 (first received 8 March 2016).
-
- Stiekema LC, Stroes ES, Verweije SL, Kassahun LC, Chen L, Wasserman SM, et al. Persistent arterial wall inflammation in patients with elevated lipoprotein(a) despite strong low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction by proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibody treatment. European Heart Journal 2018;0:1-8. - PMC - PubMed
Ballantyne 2015 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Ballantyne CM, Neutel J, Cropp A, Duggan W, Wang EQ, Plowchalk D, et al. Results of bococizumab, a monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type9, from a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study in statin-treated subjects with hypercholesterolemia. American Journal of Cardiology 2015;115(9):1212-21. - PubMed
Baruch 2013 {published data only}
-
- Baruch A, Peng K, Leabman M, Budha N, Luca D, Cowan KJ, et al. Effect of RG7652, a mAb against PCSK9, on apolipoprotein B, oxidized LDL, lipoprotein(A) and lipoprotein-associated phospholipase a2 in healthy individuals with elevated LDL-C. Circulation 2013;128:A12009.
Cho 2014 {published data only}
-
- Cho L, Rocco M, Colquhoun D, Sullivan D, Rosenson RS, Dent R, et al. Clinical profile of statin intolerance in the phase 3 GAUSS-2 study. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2014;30(10, Supplement):S79. - PubMed
Desai 2014 {published data only}
-
- Desai NR, Giugliano RP, Zhou J, Kohli P, Somaratne R, Hoffman E, et al. AMG 145, a monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, facilitates achievement of National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals among high-risk patients: an analysis from the LAPLACE-TIMI 57 trial (LDL-C assessment with PCSK9 monoclonal antibody inhibition combined with statin therapy-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction 57). Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014;63:430-3. - PubMed
Dias 2012 {published data only}
-
- Dias CS, Shaywitz AJ, Wasserman SM, Smith BP, Gao B, Stolman DS, et al. Effects of AMG 145 on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels: results from 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers and hypercholesterolemic subjects on statins. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012;60:1888-98. - PubMed
Dufour 2012 {published data only}
-
- Dufour R, Moriarty PM, Genestin E, Sasiela WJ, Du Y, Ferrand AC, et al. Effect of REGN727/SAR236553 anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 fully human monoclonal antibody in patients with elevated triglycerides/low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: data from three phase 2 studies (NCT:01266876; 01288469; 01288443). Circulation 2012;126:A16127.
EBBINGHAUS {published data only}
-
- NCT02207634. Evaluating PCSK9 Binding antiBody Influence oN coGnitive HeAlth in High cardiovascUlar Risk Subjects (EBBINGHAUS). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02207634 (first received 31 July 2014).
EQUATOR {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
-
- Tingley W, Mosesova S, Baruch A, Davis JD, Budha N, Vilimovskij A, et al. Effects of RG7652, a monoclonal antibody against proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexintype 9, on LDL cholesterol in patients with coronary heart disease or high risk: results from the EQUATOR study. European Heart Journal 2014;35:371.
Gaudet 2012 {published data only}
-
- Gaudet D, Kereiakes D, McKenney J, Roth E, Hanotin C, Gipe D, et al. Effect of SAR236553/REGN727 fully human monoclonal anti-proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibody on plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations: pooled analysis from three phase 2 studies (NCT:01266876; 01288469; 01288443). Circulation 2012;126:A14725.
Gaudet 2013 {published data only}
-
- Gaudet D, Kereiakes D, McKenney J, Roth E, Hanotin C, Gipe D, et al. Alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, reduces high plasma lp(a) concentration: pooled analysis of 352 patients from phase 2. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2013;7(3):283-4.
Gumbiner 2012 {published data only}
-
- Gumbiner B, Udata C, Joh T, Liang H, Wan H, Shelton D, et al. The effects of multiple dose administration of RN316 (PF-04950619), a humanized IgG2a monoclonal antibody binding proprotein convertase snbtilisin kexin type 9, in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Circulation 2012;126:21.
Habibinejad 2016 {published data only}
-
- Habibinejad H, Khosrokhavar F. The effects of alirocumab on LDL cholesterol in patients receiving statins. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2016;32(10 Suppl 1):S122.
HAUSER‐RCT {published data only}
-
- NCT02392559. Trial assessing efficacy, safety and tolerability of PCSK9 inhibition in paediatric subjects with genetic LDL disorders (HAUSER-RCT). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02392559 (first received 25 February 2015).
Hopkins 2013 {published data only}
-
- Hopkins PN, Swergold GD, Mellis S, Bruckert E, Luc G, Mendoza J, et al. A randomized placebo-phase clinical trial with the monoclonal antibody alirocumab demonstrates reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 gain-of-function mutations. Circulation 2013;128(22):A17156.
Jones 2015 {published data only}
-
- Jones PH, Bays H, Chaudhari U, Pordy R, Lorenzato C, Miller K, et al. Pooled safety and adverse events in nine randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 and 3 clinical trials of alirocumab. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015;65(10 Supplement):A1363.
Kastelein 2015 {published data only}
-
- Kastelein J, Nissen S, Rader D, Krueger K, Wang MD. Safety and efficacy of LY 3015014, a new monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK 9) with an inherently longer duration of action, in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging, phase 2 study. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2015;65:A1591.
Kawashiri 2012 {published data only}
-
- Kawashiri MA, Nohara A, Noguchi T, Tada H, Nakanishi C, Mori M, et al. Efficacy and safety of coadministration of rosuvastatin, ezetimibe, and colestimide in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. American Journal of Cardiology 2012;109:364-9. - PubMed
Mabuchi 2015 {published data only}
-
- Mabuchi H, Nohara A. Therapy: PCSK9 inhibitors for treating familial hypercholesterolaemia. Nature Reviews Endocrinology 2015;11(1):8-9. - PubMed
Maxwell 2012 {published data only}
-
- Maxwell KN, Breslow JL. Antibodies to PCSK9: a superior way to lower LDL cholesterol? Circulation Research 2012;111:274-7. - PubMed
Mearns 2014 {published data only}
-
- Mearns BM. Dyslipidaemia: 1-year results from OSLER trial of anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibody evolocumab. Nature Reviews Cardiology 2014;11:63. - PubMed
Pordy 2013 {published data only}
-
- Pordy R, Lecorps G, Bessac L, Sasiela WJ, Ginsberg H. Alirocumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody to proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9: therapeutic dosing in phase 3 studies. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2013;7(3):279.
Raal 2014a {published data only}
-
- Raal F, Giugliano RP, Sabatine MS, Koren MJ, Blom D, Honarpour N, et al. Long-term reduction in lipoprotein(A) with the PCSK9 monoclonal antibody evolocumab (AMG 145): a pooled analysis of 3278 patients in phase 2, 3, and open label extension studies. Circulation 2014;130:A15743.
Raal 2014b {published data only}
-
- Raal F, Nelson P, Langslet G, Basart DC, Civeira F, Lopez-Miranda J, et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of long-term administration of monthly AMG 145 in subjects with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. Global Heart 2014;1:e139.
Shaywitz 2012 {published data only}
-
- Shaywitz AJ, Dias C, Smith B, Gao B, Gibbs J, Emery M, et al. AMG 145, a fully human monoclonal antibody against PCSK9, reduces LDL-C in healthy volunteers and patients on stable doses of statins. Journal of Clinical Lipidology 2012;6(3):286-7.
SPIRE 1/2 {published data only}
-
- Ridker PM, Revking J, Amarenco P, Brunell R, Curto M, Civeria F, et al. Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of bococizumab in high-risk patients. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;376:1527-39. - PubMed
SPIRE biomarker trials {published data only}
-
- Ridker PM, Tardif JC, Amarenco P, Duggan W, Glyn RJ, Jukema WJ, et al. Lipid-reduction variability and antidrug-antibody formation with bococizumab. New England Journal of Medicine 2017;online first:1-10. - PubMed
Stawowy 2014 {published data only}
-
- Stawowy P, Just IA, Kaschina E. Inhibition of PCSK9: a novel approach for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Coronary Artery Disease 2014;25:353-9. - PubMed
Stein 2012 {published data only}
-
- Stein EA, Mellis S, Yancopoulos GD, Stahl N, Logan D, Smith WB, et al. Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9 on LDL cholesterol. New England Journal of Medicine 2012;366:1108-18. - PubMed
Stein 2013 {published data only}
-
- Stein EA, Somaratne R, Schou MB, Civeira F, Sullivan D, Watts GF, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of long-term treatment with AMG 145 in patients with statin intolerance. Circulation 2013;128:A12621.
Swergold 2010 {published data only}
-
- Swergold G, Biedermann S, Renard R, Nadler D, Wu R, Mellis S. Safety, lipid, and lipoprotein effects of REGN727/SAR236553, a fully-human proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 (PCSK9) monoclonal antibody administered intravenously to healthy volunteers. Circulation 2010;122:2.
Swergold 2011 {published data only}
-
- Swergold G, Smith W, Mellis S, Logan D, Webb C, Wu R, et al. Inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 with a monoclonal antibody REGN727/SAR236553, effectively reduces low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, as mono or add-on therapy in heterozygous familial and non familial hypercholesterolemia. Circulation 2011;124:2.
TAUSSIG {published data only}
-
- NCT01624142. Trial assessing long term use of PCSK9 inhibition in subjects with genetic LDL disorders (TAUSSIG). clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01624142 (first received 5 June 2012).
-
- Raal FJ, Hoving GK, Blom D, Santos RD, Harada-Shiba M, Bruckert E. Long-term treatment with evolocumab added to conventional drug therapy, with or without apheresis, in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia: an interim subset analysis of the open-label TAUSSIG study. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology 2017;5:280-90. - PubMed
Wan 2013 {published data only}
-
- Wan H, Gumbiner B, Joh T, Udata C, Forgues P, Garzone PD. Effects of RN316 (pf-04950615), a humanized IgG2a monoclonal antibody binding proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9, on lipoprotein particles in hypercholesterolemic subjects. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2013;31:E1387.
References to ongoing studies
ALTAIR {published data only}
-
- Otak H, Sugizaki Y, Toba T, Nagano Y, Tsukiyama Y, Yanaka KI, et al. Efficacy of alirocumab for reducing plaque vulnerability: study protocol for ALTAIR, a randomized controlled trial in Japanese patients with coronary artery disease receiving rosuvastatin. Journal of Cardiology 2019;73:228-32. - PubMed
EVOLVD {published data only}
-
- Broch K, Gustafsson F, Radegran G, Karl LB, Eiskjnr H, Gjesdal G, et al. EVOLVD: cholesterol lowering with EVOLocumab to prevent cardiac allograft vasculopathy in de-novo heart transplant recipients: rationale and design of a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation 2019;38:S279. - PubMed
NCT02833844 {published data only}
-
- NCT02833844. Safety, tolerability & efficacy on LDL-C of evolocumab in subjects with HIV & hyperlipidemia/mixed dyslipidemia. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02833844 (first received 13 June 2016).
UMIN000034592 {unpublished data only}
-
- NA. Ongoing study. 26 October 2018. Contact author for more information.
Additional references
Abifadel 2003
-
- Abifadel M, Varret M, Rabès JP, Allard D, Ouguerram K, Devillers M, et al. Mutations in PCSK9 cause autosomal dominant hypercholesterolemia. Nature Genetics 2013;34(2):154-6. - PubMed
AlTurki 2019
-
- AlTurki A, Marafi M, Dawas A, Dube MP, Vieira L, Sherman MH, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials assessing the impact of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 antibodies on mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. American Journal of Cardiology 2019;124:1869-75. - PubMed
Benn 2010
-
- Benn M, Nordestgaard BG, Grande P, Schnohr P, Tybjaerg-Hansen A. PCSK9 R46L, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and risk of ischemic heart disease: 3 independent studies and meta-analyses. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2010;55(22):2833-42. - PubMed
Benn 2012
-
- Benn M, Watts GF, Tybjaerg-Hansen A, Nordestgaard BG. Familial hypercholesterolemia in the Danish general population: prevalence, coronary artery disease, and cholesterol-lowering medication. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 2012;97(11):3956-64. - PubMed
Bradburn 2007
-
- Bradburn MJ, Deeks JJ, Berlin JA, Localio AR. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events. Statistics in Medicine 2007;26(1):53-77. - PubMed
Cannon 2015
-
- Cannon CP, Blazing MA, Giugliano RP, McCagg A, White JA, Theroux P, et al. Ezetimibe added to statin therapy after acute coronary syndromes. New England Journal of Medicine 2015;372(25):2387-97. - PubMed
Casula 2019
-
- Casula M, Olmastroni E, Taddeo MB, Tragni E, Pirillo A, Catapano AL. Safety and cardiovascular efficacy of anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Atherosclerosis 2019;287:e39.
Catapano 2013
-
- Catapano AL, Papadopoulos N. The safety of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies: implications for cardiovascular disease and targeting the PCSK9 pathway. Atherosclerosis 2013;228(1):18-28. - PubMed
Catapano 2016
-
- Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, et al. 2016 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias. European Heart Journal 2016;37(39):2999-3058. - PubMed
Chasman 2012
-
- Chasman DI, Giulianini F, MacFadyen J, Barratt BJ, Nyberg F, Ridker PM. Genetic determinants of statin-induced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction: the Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) trial. Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics 2012;5(2):257-64. - PubMed
Cohen 2005
-
- Cohen J, Pertsemlidis A, Kotowski IK, Graham R, Garcia CK, Hobbs HH. Low LDL cholesterol in individuals of African descent resulting from frequent nonsense mutations in PCSK9. Nature Genetics 2005;37(2):161-5. - PubMed
Cohen 2006
-
- Cohen JC, Boerwinkle E, Mosley TH Jr, Hobbs HH. Sequence variations in PCSK9, low LDL, and protection against coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2006;354(12):1264-72. - PubMed
Collins 2016
-
- Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, Armitage J, Baigent C, Blackwell L, et al. Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Lancet 2016;388(10059):2532-61. - PubMed
CTT 2005a
-
- Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators. Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366(9493):1267-78. - PubMed
CTT 2005b
-
- Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration, Fulcher J, O'Connell R, Voysey M, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Mihaylova B, et al. Efficacy and safety of LDL-lowering therapy among men and women: meta-analysis of individual data from 174 000 participants in 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2005;385(9976):1397-405. - PubMed
CTT 2012
-
- Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaborators, Mihaylova B, Emberson J, Blackwell L, Keech A, Simes J, Barnes EH, et al. The effects of lowering LDL cholesterol with statin therapy in people at low risk of vascular disease: meta-analysis of individual data from 27 randomised trials. Lancet 2012;380(9841):581-90. - PMC - PubMed
Farnier 2014
-
- Farnier M. PCSK9: from discovery to therapeutic applications. Archives of Cardiovascular Disease 2014;107(1):58-66. - PubMed
FDA 2015
-
- Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Briefing document Praluent (alirocumab) injection. The Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting 2015;BLA 125559.
Garcia 2001
-
- Garcia CK, Wilund K, Arca M, Zuliani G, Fellin R, Maioli M, et al. Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia caused by mutations in a putative LDL receptor adaptor protein. Science 2001;292(5520):1934-8. - PubMed
Grade Working Group 2004
Grundy 2004
-
- Grundy SM, Cleeman JI, Merz CN, Brewer HB Jr, Clark LT, Hunninghake DB, et al. Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2004;44(3):720-32. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
-
- Higgins JP, Altman DG, Sterne JA. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Innerarity 1987
Knowles 2014
Lefebvre 2011
-
- Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Mancini 2011
-
- Mancini GB, Baker S, Bergeron J, Fitchett D, Frohlich J, Genest J, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of statin adverse effects and intolerance: proceedings of a Canadian Working Group Consensus Conference. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2011;27(5):635-62. - PubMed
Marks 2003
-
- Marks D, Thorogood M, Neil HA, Humpries SE. A review on the diagnosis, natural history, and treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis 2003;168(1):1-14. - PubMed
Navarese 2015
Newcombe 2014
Nissen 2016
-
- Nissen SE, Stroes E, Dent-Acosta RE, Rosenson RS, Lehman SJ, Sattar N, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of evolocumab vs ezetimibe in patients with muscle-related statin intolerance: the GAUSS-3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2016;315(15):1580-90. - PubMed
Nordestgaard 2013
Pfizer 2017
-
- Pfizer. Pfizer discontinues global development of bococizumab, its investigational PCSK9 inhibitor. www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer_discontinu... (accessed 24 April 2017).
Review Manager 2014 [Computer program]
-
- Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.4. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Sattar 2010
-
- Sattar N, Preiss D, Murray HM, Welsh P, Buckley BM, Craen AJ, et al. Statins and risk of incident diabetes: a collaborative meta-analysis of randomised statin trials. Lancet 2010;375(9716):735-42. - PubMed
Schmidt 2015
Seidah 2003
-
- Seidah NG, Benjannet S, Wickham L, Marcinkiewicz J, Jasmin SB, Stifani S, et al. The secretory proprotein convertase neural apoptosis-regulated convertase 1 (NARC-1): liver regeneration and neuronal differentiation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2003;100(3):928-33. - PMC - PubMed
Sudhof 1985
Sweeting 2004
-
- Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert, PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Statistics in Medicine 2004;23(1):1351-75. - PubMed
Swerdlow 2014
Torgeon 2018
-
- Torgeon RD, Tsuyuki RT, Gyenes GT, Pearson GJ. Cardiovascular efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibitors: systematic review and meta-analysis including the ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2018;34:1600-5. - PubMed
Willer 2013
Zhang 2015
Zwierzyna 2018
-
- Zwierzyna M, Davies M, Hingorani AD, Hunter J. Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005. BMJ 2018;361:1-11. - PMC - PubMed
References to other published versions of this review
Schmidt 2017
-
- Schmidt AF, Pearce LS, Wilkins JT, Overington JP, Hingorani AD, Casas JP. PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 4. Art. No: CD011748. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011748.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous