Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 2020
Cognitive appraisals of dissociation in psychosis: a new brief measure
Emma Černis et al. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2020.
Abstract
Background: Catastrophic cognitive appraisals, similar to those in anxiety disorders, are implicated in depersonalisation, a form of dissociation. No scales exist to measure appraisals of dissociative experiences. Dissociation is common in psychosis. Misinterpretations of dissociative experiences may maintain psychotic symptoms. Therefore, assessing appraisals in this context may be valuable.
Aims: The primary aim was to develop a measure of key appraisals of dissociation in psychosis. Secondary aims were to test the relationship between appraisals and psychotic experiences (paranoia and hallucinations), and determine whether appraisals explain additional variance in psychotic symptoms above dissociative symptoms.
Method: Fifty items were generated from transcripts of interviews with patients. The measure was developed and psychometrically validated via factor analysis of data from 9902 general population participants and 1026 patients with psychosis. Convergent validity, test-re-test reliability, and internal reliability were assessed. Regression analyses tested relationships with psychotic symptoms.
Results: A 13-item single-factor measure was developed. Factor analysis indicated good model fit [χ2(65) = 247.173, comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.960, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.052]. The scale had good convergent validity with a rumination (non-clinical: r = 0.71; clinical: r = 0.73) and dissociation measure (r = 0.81; r = 0.80), high internal consistency (α = 0.93; α = 0.93), and excellent 1-week test-re-test reliability [intraclass correlation (ICC) = 0.90]. It explained variance in psychotic symptoms (paranoia: 36.4%; hallucinations: 35.0%), including additional variance compared with dissociation alone (paranoia: 5.3%; hallucinations: 2.3%).
Conclusions: The Cognitive Appraisals of Dissociation in Psychosis (CAD-P) measure is a psychometrically robust scale identifying appraisals of dissociative experiences in psychosis and is associated with the presence of psychotic experiences. It is likely to prove useful for clinical assessment and research.
Keywords: cognitive appraisals; dissociation; hallucinations; paranoia; psychosis.
Similar articles
-
Černis E, Molodynski A, Ehlers A, Freeman D. Černis E, et al. Schizophr Res. 2022 Jan;239:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Schizophr Res. 2022. PMID: 34800911 Free PMC article.
-
Černis E, Beierl E, Molodynski A, Ehlers A, Freeman D. Černis E, et al. PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247037. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247037. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33626089 Free PMC article.
-
Sun P, Alvarez-Jimenez M, Simpson K, Lawrence K, Peach N, Bendall S. Sun P, et al. Compr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;84:68-74. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Compr Psychiatry. 2018. PMID: 29694935
-
Tsang A, Bucci S, Branitsky A, Kaptan S, Rafiq S, Wong S, Berry K, Varese F. Tsang A, et al. Schizophr Res. 2021 Apr;230:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 2. Schizophr Res. 2021. PMID: 33667857 Review.
-
Garety P, Ward T, Emsley R, Greenwood K, Freeman D, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Bebbington P, Dunn G, Hardy A. Garety P, et al. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Aug. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2021 Aug. PMID: 34398537 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Černis E, Molodynski A, Ehlers A, Freeman D. Černis E, et al. Schizophr Res. 2022 Jan;239:11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Schizophr Res. 2022. PMID: 34800911 Free PMC article.
-
Shipp L, Musatova A, Černis E, Waite P. Shipp L, et al. JCPP Adv. 2023 Oct 11;4(1):e12202. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12202. eCollection 2024 Mar. JCPP Adv. 2023. PMID: 38486953 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological mechanisms connected to dissociation: Generating hypotheses using network analyses.
Černis E, Ehlers A, Freeman D. Černis E, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Apr;148:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.01.049. Epub 2022 Jan 29. J Psychiatr Res. 2022. PMID: 35124396 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bailey, T. D. , & Brand, B. L. (2017). Traumatic dissociation: theory, research, and treatment. Clinical Psychology Science and Practice, 24, 170–185. doi: 10.1111/cpsp.12195 - DOI
-
- Baker, D. , Hunter, E. , Lawrence, E. , David, A. , Medford, N. , & Sierra, M. (2007). Overcoming Depersonalisation and Feelings of Unreality: A Self-Help Guide Using Cognitive Behavioural Techniques. Hachette UK.
-
- British Psychological Society (2017). Ethics Guidelines for Internet-Mediated Research. INF206/04.2017. Leicester: BPS.
-
- Carlson, E. B. , & Putnam, F. W. (1993). An update on the Dissociative Experiences Scale. Dissociation, 6, 16–27.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous