Full structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins from unbiased molecular dynamics simulations - PubMed
- ️Fri Jan 01 2021
Full structural ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins from unbiased molecular dynamics simulations
Utsab R Shrestha et al. Commun Biol. 2021.
Abstract
Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation is widely used to complement ensemble-averaged experiments of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). However, MD often suffers from limitations of inaccuracy. Here, we show that enhancing the sampling using Hamiltonian replica-exchange MD (HREMD) led to unbiased and accurate ensembles, reproducing small-angle scattering and NMR chemical shift experiments, for three IDPs of varying sequence properties using two recently optimized force fields, indicating the general applicability of HREMD for IDPs. We further demonstrate that, unlike HREMD, standard MD can reproduce experimental NMR chemical shifts, but not small-angle scattering data, suggesting chemical shifts are insufficient for testing the validity of IDP ensembles. Surprisingly, we reveal that despite differences in their sequence, the inter-chain statistics of all three IDPs are similar for short contour lengths (< 10 residues). The results suggest that the major hurdle of generating an accurate unbiased ensemble for IDPs has now been largely overcome.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

a–c The histograms of Rg of a Histatin 5, b Sic 1, and c SH4UD obtained from MD simulations. The inverted triangles indicate the average Rg of each simulation. d–f The SAXS profiles calculated from simulations (using SWAXS) are compared to experiments for d Histatin 5, e Sic 1, and f SH4UD. Insets: SAXS data are zoomed at low-q values to show the differences in intensity for different force fields and sampling methods. In all cases, the color code indicates the force fields, a03ws or a99SB-disp, and sampling methods, standard MD or HREMD (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). HREMD results are from the lowest rank replica of the simulations shown by the bold-italics font in Supplementary Table 2. SANS data of SH4UD are shown in Supplementary Fig. 2.

Comparison between the ensemble-averaged experimental (bars) and calculated (symbols) NMR secondary chemical shifts (ΔCS) of backbone atoms a NH, b Cα, and c Cβ for SH4UD. ΔCS RMSE of backbone atoms with respect to experimental values (bars), as defined in Eq. (6), for d Histatin 5, e Sic 1, and f SH4UD. The error bars in ΔCS RMSE (d–f) are the standard error of the mean as defined in Eq. (4). The color code indicates the force field and sampling method used. The theoretical NMR chemical shifts are calculated using SHIFTX2. The prediction values of SHIFTX2 have RMS errors of 1.12, 0.44, 0.52, 0.17, and 0.12 p.p.m. for backbone atoms NH, Cα, Cβ, HN, and Hα, respectively.

a The orientational correlation function as a function of the pairwise residue sequence separation, s. For s<5, Cs is fitted by Cs=e−s/k for each IDP, where k is the number of Cα atom pair related to persistence length (lp) by lp = k × 0.38 nm. For s≥5 the power law Cs~s−3/2 applies only for Sic 1, whereas for Histatin 5 and SH4UD the correlation vanishes. b–d The average pairwise geometric distance (Rs) between Cα atoms of two residues at separation s for b Histatin 5, c Sic 1, and d SH4UD. The data are fitted by Eq. (2) in two regimes, s ≤ 10 (blue) and s > 10 (red). The error bars are smaller than the symbol size.
Similar articles
-
Chan-Yao-Chong M, Durand D, Ha-Duong T. Chan-Yao-Chong M, et al. J Chem Inf Model. 2019 May 28;59(5):1743-1758. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00928. Epub 2019 Mar 18. J Chem Inf Model. 2019. PMID: 30840442 Review.
-
Chen SH, Weiss KL, Stanley C, Bhowmik D. Chen SH, et al. Protein Sci. 2023 Oct;32(10):e4772. doi: 10.1002/pro.4772. Protein Sci. 2023. PMID: 37646172 Free PMC article.
-
Shrestha UR, Juneja P, Zhang Q, Gurumoorthy V, Borreguero JM, Urban V, Cheng X, Pingali SV, Smith JC, O'Neill HM, Petridis L. Shrestha UR, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 8;116(41):20446-20452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907251116. Epub 2019 Sep 23. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 31548393 Free PMC article.
-
de Souza JV, Zariquiey FS, Bronowska AK. de Souza JV, et al. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 26;21(17):6166. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176166. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32859072 Free PMC article.
-
Recent Advances in Computational Protocols Addressing Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Bhattacharya S, Lin X. Bhattacharya S, et al. Biomolecules. 2019 Apr 11;9(4):146. doi: 10.3390/biom9040146. Biomolecules. 2019. PMID: 30979035 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Tesei G, Schulze TK, Crehuet R, Lindorff-Larsen K. Tesei G, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 2;118(44):e2111696118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111696118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 34716273 Free PMC article.
-
Water molecule ordering on the surface of an intrinsically disordered protein.
Vural D, Shrestha UR, Petridis L, Smith JC. Vural D, et al. Biophys J. 2023 Nov 21;122(22):4326-4335. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2023.10.007. Epub 2023 Oct 14. Biophys J. 2023. PMID: 37838830 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling Catalysis in Allosteric Enzymes: Capturing Conformational Consequences.
Klem H, McCullagh M, Paton RS. Klem H, et al. Top Catal. 2022 Feb;65(1-4):165-186. doi: 10.1007/s11244-021-01521-1. Epub 2021 Nov 9. Top Catal. 2022. PMID: 36304771 Free PMC article.
-
Gaza JT, Leyson JJC, Peña GT, Nellas RB. Gaza JT, et al. ACS Omega. 2021 Sep 7;6(37):24166-24175. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.1c03729. eCollection 2021 Sep 21. ACS Omega. 2021. PMID: 34568695 Free PMC article.
-
The Action of Chemical Denaturants: From Globular to Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.
Paladino A, Vitagliano L, Graziano G. Paladino A, et al. Biology (Basel). 2023 May 22;12(5):754. doi: 10.3390/biology12050754. Biology (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37237566 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources