A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture - PubMed
Review
. 2021 Mar;591(7851):551-563.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Affiliations
- PMID: 33762770
- DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6
Review
A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture
Rosamond L Naylor et al. Nature. 2021 Mar.
Erratum in
-
Author Correction: A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture.
Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, Klinger DH, Little DC, Lubchenco J, Shumway SE, Troell M. Naylor RL, et al. Nature. 2021 May;593(7858):E12. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03508-0. Nature. 2021. PMID: 33903771
-
Publisher Correction: A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture.
Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, Klinger DH, Little DC, Lubchenco J, Shumway SE, Troell M. Naylor RL, et al. Nature. 2021 Jul;595(7868):E36. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03736-4. Nature. 2021. PMID: 34230652 No abstract available.
Abstract
The sustainability of aquaculture has been debated intensely since 2000, when a review on the net contribution of aquaculture to world fish supplies was published in Nature. This paper reviews the developments in global aquaculture from 1997 to 2017, incorporating all industry sub-sectors and highlighting the integration of aquaculture in the global food system. Inland aquaculture-especially in Asia-has contributed the most to global production volumes and food security. Major gains have also occurred in aquaculture feed efficiency and fish nutrition, lowering the fish-in-fish-out ratio for all fed species, although the dependence on marine ingredients persists and reliance on terrestrial ingredients has increased. The culture of both molluscs and seaweed is increasingly recognized for its ecosystem services; however, the quantification, valuation, and market development of these services remain rare. The potential for molluscs and seaweed to support global nutritional security is underexploited. Management of pathogens, parasites, and pests remains a sustainability challenge industry-wide, and the effects of climate change on aquaculture remain uncertain and difficult to validate. Pressure on the aquaculture industry to embrace comprehensive sustainability measures during this 20-year period have improved the governance, technology, siting, and management in many cases.
Similar articles
-
Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies.
Naylor RL, Goldburg RJ, Primavera JH, Kautsky N, Beveridge MC, Clay J, Folke C, Lubchenco J, Mooney H, Troell M. Naylor RL, et al. Nature. 2000 Jun 29;405(6790):1017-24. doi: 10.1038/35016500. Nature. 2000. PMID: 10890435 Review.
-
Disease will limit future food supply from the global crustacean fishery and aquaculture sectors.
Stentiford GD, Neil DM, Peeler EJ, Shields JD, Small HJ, Flegel TW, Vlak JM, Jones B, Morado F, Moss S, Lotz J, Bartholomay L, Behringer DC, Hauton C, Lightner DV. Stentiford GD, et al. J Invertebr Pathol. 2012 Jun;110(2):141-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jip.2012.03.013. Epub 2012 Mar 14. J Invertebr Pathol. 2012. PMID: 22434002 Review.
-
Gloom and doom? The future of marine capture fisheries.
Garcia SM, Grainger RJ. Garcia SM, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jan 29;360(1453):21-46. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1580. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005. PMID: 15713587 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Aquaculture: global status and trends.
Bostock J, McAndrew B, Richards R, Jauncey K, Telfer T, Lorenzen K, Little D, Ross L, Handisyde N, Gatward I, Corner R. Bostock J, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 27;365(1554):2897-912. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0170. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010. PMID: 20713392 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peeler EJ, Ernst I. Peeler EJ, et al. Rev Sci Tech. 2019 Sep;38(2):361-383. doi: 10.20506/rst.38.2.2992. Rev Sci Tech. 2019. PMID: 31866687 English, French, Spanish.
Cited by
-
Amoussou N, Thomas M, Pasquet A, Lecocq T. Amoussou N, et al. Life (Basel). 2022 Aug 26;12(9):1315. doi: 10.3390/life12091315. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36143351 Free PMC article.
-
Vaibarova V, Kralova S, Palikova M, Schwarzerova J, Nejezchlebova J, Cejkova D, Cizek A. Vaibarova V, et al. BMC Microbiol. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12866-024-03490-3. BMC Microbiol. 2024. PMID: 39294581 Free PMC article.
-
Schaal P, Cheaib B, Kaufmann J, Phillips K, Ryder L, McGinnity P, Llewellyn M. Schaal P, et al. Anim Microbiome. 2022 Sep 15;4(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00203-x. Anim Microbiome. 2022. PMID: 36109797 Free PMC article.
-
Chakraborty N, Das BK, Bera AK, Borah S, Mohanty D, Yadav AK, Kumar J, Koushlesh SK, Chanu TN, Panda SP, Vallangi R. Chakraborty N, et al. Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 25;12(12):1979. doi: 10.3390/life12121979. Life (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36556344 Free PMC article.
-
Lazado CC, Timmerhaus G, Breiland MW, Pittman K, Hytterød S. Lazado CC, et al. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Nov 30;10(12):1931. doi: 10.3390/antiox10121931. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34943035 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Naylor, R. L. et al. Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies. Nature 405, 1017–1024 (2000). This paper, the original study that motivated this 20-year retrospective Review, provides an analysis of the use of wild fish in aquafeeds and the contribution of fed aquaculture to the net balance of seafood supplies. - PubMed - DOI
-
- FAO. Fisheries and Aquaculture Software. FishStatJ: Software for Fishery and Aquaculture Statistical Time Series http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/software/fishstatj/en (FAO Fisheries Division, 2019).
-
- Tacon, A. G. J. Trends in global aquaculture and aquafeed production: 2000–2017. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquacult. 28, 43–56 (2020). - DOI
-
- Belton, B. & Thilsted, S. H. Fisheries in transition: food and nutrition security implications for the Global South. Glob. Food Secur. 3, 59–66 (2014). - DOI
-
- Béné, C. et al. Contribution of fisheries and aquaculture to food security and poverty reduction: assessing the current evidence. World Dev. 79, 177–196 (2016). - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources