Streaming ambivalence: Livestreaming and indie game development - PubMed
Streaming ambivalence: Livestreaming and indie game development
Felan Parker et al. Convergence (Lond). 2021 Dec.
Abstract
Commercial game makers at all scales of production have increasingly come to incorporate livestreaming into every stage of the game development cycle. Mainstream hits like Fortnite and League of Legends owe their ongoing success in no small part to their massive uptake by streamers, and triple-A releases from major publishers can reliably expect significant attention on streaming platforms. But what about smaller, lower budget games? For independent game developers, the costs and benefits of streaming are less clear. Based on interviews with small commercial indie developers in Toronto and Montréal, this article critically examines different discourses around streaming and commercial indie games, focusing on developer perceptions of the benefits and risks of streaming and its impacts on indie game-making practices, including production, promotion, and community-building. Contrary to persistent popular myths about streaming as the key to 'discoverability', commercial indie game development remains a precarious form of cultural work, and indie games collectively attract only a tiny fraction of the overall audience on streaming platforms. There is a high level of uncertainty about the factors that led to a given game's success, leaving many indie developers ambivalent about leveraging influencer attention and even as they commit significant time and energy trying to doing so.
Keywords: Cultural production; Twitch; game development; game studies; independent games; indie games; live streaming; platforms.
© The Author(s) 2021.
Similar articles
-
Megabooth: The cultural intermediation of indie games.
Parker F, Whitson JR, Simon B. Parker F, et al. New Media Soc. 2018 May;20(5):1953-1972. doi: 10.1177/1461444817711403. Epub 2017 Jun 5. New Media Soc. 2018. PMID: 30581359 Free PMC article.
-
Whitson JR, Simon B, Parker F. Whitson JR, et al. Eur J Cult Stud. 2021 Apr;24(2):606-627. doi: 10.1177/1367549418810082. Epub 2018 Dec 21. Eur J Cult Stud. 2021. PMID: 33867811 Free PMC article.
-
Cabeza-Ramírez LJ, Sánchez-Cañizares SM, Fuentes-García FJ. Cabeza-Ramírez LJ, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 25;17(19):7019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197019. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32992885 Free PMC article.
-
The Making and Evaluation of Digital Games Used for the Assessment of Attention: Systematic Review.
Wiley K, Robinson R, Mandryk RL. Wiley K, et al. JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Aug 9;9(3):e26449. doi: 10.2196/26449. JMIR Serious Games. 2021. PMID: 34383674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cabeza-Ramírez LJ, Fuentes-García FJ, Muñoz-Fernandez GA. Cabeza-Ramírez LJ, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 12;18(6):2917. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062917. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 33809213 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abidin C. (2015) Communicative ❤ ❤intimacies: Influencers and perceived interconnectedness. Ada: A Journal of New Media & Technology. Available at: https://adanewmedia.org/2015/11/issue8-abidin/ (accessed 19 February 2021).
-
- Abidin C. (2018. a) Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley; North America: Emerald Group Pub Ltd.
-
- Abidin C. (2018. b) Layers of identity. Real Life. Available at: https://reallifemag.com/layers-of-identity/ (accessed 19 February 2021).
-
- Baym NK. (2015) Connect with your audience! The relational labor of connection. The Communication Review 18(1): 14–22.
-
- Bishop S. (2020) Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on Youtube. Social Media + Society 6(1): 2056305119897323.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources