pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Mechanical dilatation of the stenosed cervix under local anesthesia: A prospective case series - PubMed

. 2022 Apr;48(4):956-965.

doi: 10.1111/jog.15179. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

Affiliations

Mechanical dilatation of the stenosed cervix under local anesthesia: A prospective case series

Kirsty V Biggs et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Apr.

Abstract

Aim: Cervical stenosis is traditionally managed by mechanical dilatation under general anesthesia (GA). We aimed to assess the safety, effectiveness, and patient acceptability of dilatation in the outpatient setting under local anesthesia (LA).

Methods: Data were collected prospectively from all patients attending the outpatient department with cervical stenosis from March 20, 2015 to September 23, 2020. Mechanical dilatation of the cervix was performed using Hegar dilators under LA. Subsequent colposcopic assessment, cytology, histology, and management were recorded.

Results: One hundred forty-nine cases were referred for cervical dilatation, 63 (43%) of which had complete stenosis. One hundred eighteen (79%) patients had previously undergone cervical procedures. Successful dilatation under LA was achieved in 119 (83%) patients; 5 (3%) declined (requesting GA), 6 (4%) did not tolerate speculum examination, and 19 (13%) had unsuccessful procedures. The median Hegar size used was 8 mm. Dilatation under LA was acceptable in 93% attempted procedures. Thirteen episodes of restenosis were recorded with no major adverse events. Younger age (p = 0.045) and severe (compared to complete) stenosis (p < 0.0001) were associated with procedure success, with improved results over time (p = 0.003). Successful dilatation permitted cervical assessment; eight patients required cervical excisions, two underwent hysterectomies, with one confirmed case of adenocarcinoma.

Conclusion: Rigid cervical dilatation in the outpatient setting provides effective, instantaneous treatment for women who have failed cytological or colposcopic assessment. For the vast majority of women, the procedure was well tolerated and preferred to using GA. However, given that 1 in 10 women experienced restenosis, patients should be counseled about the possibility of requiring further management.

Keywords: anesthesia; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; colposcopy; local; outpatients; uterine cervical neoplasms.

© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Kirsty V. Biggs, Mallikarjun Kodampur, and San S. Hoo disclose no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Wertz JP, Cuénin C, Ritter J, Philippe E. Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(1):64–70. - PubMed
    1. Baldauf JJ, Dreyfus M, Ritter J, Meyer P, Philippe E. Risk of cervical stenosis after large loop excision or laser conization. Obstet Gynecol. 1996. Dec;88(6):933–8. - PubMed
    1. Bettocchi S, Bramante S, Bifulco G, Spinelli M, Ceci O, Fascilla FD, et al. Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):e16–7. - PubMed
    1. Carcopino X, Mancini J, Gondry J, Chevreau J, Lamblin G, Atallah A, et al. Risk factors of inadequate colposcopy after large loop excision of the transformation zone: a prospective cohort study. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2018;22(1):31–7. - PubMed
    1. Suh‐Burgmann EJ, Whall‐Strojwas D, Chang Y, Hundley D, Goodman A. Risk factors for cervical stenosis after loop electrocautery excision procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt 1):657–60. - PubMed

MeSH terms