Association Between Antidepressant Efficacy and Interactions of Three Core Depression-Related Brain Networks in Major Depressive Disorder - PubMed
- ️Sat Jan 01 2022
Association Between Antidepressant Efficacy and Interactions of Three Core Depression-Related Brain Networks in Major Depressive Disorder
Qiang Wang et al. Front Psychiatry. 2022.
Abstract
Background: The central executive network (CEN), salience network (SN), and default mode network (DMN) are the three most studied depression-related brain networks. Many studies have shown that they are related to depression symptoms and treatment effects. However, few studies have related these three networks and their activity frequency bands to depressive symptoms and treatment efficacy.
Methods: Sixty-six medication-free patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) were enrolled. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was administered at baseline to calculate imaging indicators such as the power and functional connectivity (FC) of each brain network. The Hamilton Rating Score for Depression (HRSD-17) was assessed at baseline and weekly for 4 weeks. Pearson correlation and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analyses were used to explore the relationship between brain imaging indicators and antidepressant efficacy.
Results: The difference between therapeutically effective and ineffective groups was mainly manifested in the beta power of the SN. The FC of beta waves between the three networks was related to antidepressant efficacy, with ROC analysis results of AUC = 0.794, P = 0.004, sensitivity = 76.7%, and specificity = 81.8%.
Limitations: The sample size was small and a healthy control group was not available.
Conclusions: The interaction between the three networks is related to antidepressant efficacy and the relief of depressive symptoms.
Keywords: antidepressant efficacy; central executive network; default mode network; magnetoencephalography; salience network.
Copyright © 2022 Wang, Tian, Zhao, Cao, Lu and Yao.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Dynamic community structure in major depressive disorder: A resting-state MEG study.
Tian S, Chattun MR, Zhang S, Bi K, Tang H, Yan R, Wang Q, Yao Z, Lu Q. Tian S, et al. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 8;92:39-47. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 17. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 30572002
-
Liu G, Jiao K, Zhong Y, Hao Z, Wang C, Xu H, Teng C, Song X, Xiao C, Fox PT, Zhang N, Wang C. Liu G, et al. Behav Brain Res. 2021 Feb 26;400:113018. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2020.113018. Epub 2020 Dec 7. Behav Brain Res. 2021. PMID: 33301816
-
Wang Q, Tian S, Tang H, Liu X, Yan R, Hua L, Shi J, Chen Y, Zhu R, Lu Q, Yao Z. Wang Q, et al. J Affect Disord. 2019 Jun 1;252:365-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.046. Epub 2019 Apr 8. J Affect Disord. 2019. PMID: 30999093
-
Brakowski J, Spinelli S, Dörig N, Bosch OG, Manoliu A, Holtforth MG, Seifritz E. Brakowski J, et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2017 Sep;92:147-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Apr 24. J Psychiatr Res. 2017. PMID: 28458140 Review.
-
Graph theory approach for the structural-functional brain connectome of depression.
Yun JY, Kim YK. Yun JY, et al. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 20;111:110401. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110401. Epub 2021 Jul 12. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 34265367 Review.
Cited by
-
Gao W, Gao Y, Xu Y, Liang J, Sun Y, Zhang Y, Shan F, Ge J, Xia Q. Gao W, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05910-0. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38877455 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources