pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

On the Measurement of Climate Change Anxiety: French Validation of the Climate Anxiety Scale - PubMed

  • ️Sat Jan 01 2022

. 2022 Mar 22;62(1):123-135.

doi: 10.5334/pb.1137. eCollection 2022.

Affiliations

On the Measurement of Climate Change Anxiety: French Validation of the Climate Anxiety Scale

Camille Mouguiama-Daouda et al. Psychol Belg. 2022.

Abstract

The notion of climate change anxiety has gained traction in the last years. Clayton & Karazsia (2020) recently developed the 22-item Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CAS), which assesses climate change anxiety via a four-factor structure. Yet other research has cast doubts on the very structure of the CAS by calling either for a shorter (i.e. 13 items) two-factor structure or for a shorter single-factor structure (i.e. 13 items). So far, these three different models have not yet been compared in one study. Moreover, uncertainty remains regarding the associations between the CAS and other psychological constructs, especially anxiety and depression. This project was designed to overcome these limitations. In a first preregistered study (n = 305), we translated the scale into French and tested, via confirmatory factor analyses (CFA), whether the French version would better fit with a four-, two-, or single-factor structure, as implied by previous works. We also examined how the CAS factors related to depression, anxiety, and environmental identity. In a second preregistered study, we aimed at replicating our comparison between the three CFA models in a larger sample (n = 905). Both studies pointed to a 13-item version of the scale with a two-factor structure as the best fitting model, with one factor reflecting cognitive and emotional features of climate change anxiety and the other reflecting the related functional impairments. Each factor exhibited a positive association with depression and environmental identity but not with general anxiety. We discuss how this two-factor structure impacts the conceptualization of climate change anxiety.

Keywords: French validation; assessment; climate change; climate change anxiety; eco-anxiety; psychometrics.

Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317–332. DOI: 10.1007/BF02294359 - DOI
    1. Albrecht, G. (2012). Psychoterratic conditions in a scientific and technological world. In Kahn P. H. & Hasbach P. H. (Eds.), Ecopsychology: Science, Totems, and the Technological Species (pp. 241–264). MIT Press.
    1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck depression inventory-II. TX: Psychological Corporation. DOI: 10.1037/t00742-000 - DOI
    1. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57(1), 289–300. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x - DOI
    1. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources