pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Proven and not proven: A potential alternative to the current Scottish verdict system - PubMed

. 2022 May;40(3):452-466.

doi: 10.1002/bsl.2568. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Affiliations

PMID: 35460096
PMCID: PMC9543260
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2568

Proven and not proven: A potential alternative to the current Scottish verdict system

Lee John Curley et al. Behav Sci Law. 2022 May.

Abstract

The current Scottish verdict system includes three verdicts: 'guilty', 'not guilty' and 'not proven'. The Scottish Government are currently reviewing the utility of the not proven verdict. Proponents of the not proven verdict suggest that it directs jurors to their true role of determining whether the prosecution's case has, or has not, been 'proven'. Reformists suggest a move to a system similar to England and Wales, with only guilty and not guilty verdicts. However, legal professionals have indicated a preference for an alternative system of proven and not proven. The aim of the current study was to test the effects of a proven and not proven system on verdicts given, when compared to alternative verdict systems (specifically, the current Scottish and Anglo-American verdict systems). 227 mock jurors watched a staged murder trial, filmed in a real-life courtroom, with legal professionals questioning witnesses and a judge giving legal direction. Jurors were significantly more likely to convict in a guilty and not guilty verdict system than either a proven and not proven or a guilty, not guilty and not proven verdict system. Future research should replicate this study with a focus on the impact of the not proven verdict in sexual offences.

Keywords: Scottish legal system; juror decision making; jury reform; proven and not proven; three-verdict system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Cited by

Juror characteristics on trial: Investigating how psychopathic traits, rape attitudes, victimization experiences, and juror demographics influence decision-making in an intimate partner rape trial.
Lilley C, Willmott D, Mojtahedi D. Lilley C, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 16;13:1086026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1086026. eCollection 2022. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 36727087 Free PMC article.
Rape Myths and Verdict Systems: What Is Influencing Conviction Rates in Rape Trials in Scotland?
Curley LJ, Lages M, Sime PJ, Munro J. Curley LJ, et al. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 21;14(7):619. doi: 10.3390/bs14070619. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39062442 Free PMC article.

References

1. Andrade, C. (2020). The limitations of online surveys. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 42(6), 575–576. - PMC - PubMed
1. Barbato, J. M. (2004). Scotland's Bastard Verdict: Intermediacy and the unique three‐verdict system. Indiana International & Comparative Law Review, 15, 543–581. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/iicl15&div=2...
1. Bekhet, A. K. , & Zauszniewski, J. A. (2012). Methodological triangulation: An approach to understanding data. Nurse Researcher, 20(2), 40–43. 10.7748/nr2012.11.20.2.40.c9442 - DOI - PubMed
1. Curley, L. J. (2021). Juror and jury decision making. In Turner A. J., Hewson C., Mahendran K., & Strathie A. (Eds.), Living psychology: From the everyday to the extraordinary (pp. 361–394). Oxford University Press/The Open University.
1. Curley, L. J. , MacLean, R. , Murray, J. , Laybourn, P. , & Brown, D. (2019a). The bastard verdict and its influence on jurors. Medicine, Science & the Law, 59(1), 26–35. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources