The model AS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: Mayo Clinic experience - PubMed
The model AS 800 artificial urinary sphincter: Mayo Clinic experience
B Goldwasser et al. J Urol. 1987 Apr.
Abstract
The model AS 800 artificial urinary sphincter was implanted in 100 male and 9 female patients between 7 and 89 years old. Postoperative followup was 1 to 32 months. The indication for implantation was total urinary incontinence in 86 patients (78.9 per cent), stress incontinence in 22 (21.2 per cent) and urgency incontinence in 1 (0.9 per cent). Of the patients 97 (89 per cent) underwent implantation for the first time, 7 (6.4 per cent) had a previous artificial urinary sphincter model replaced by the AS 800 device and 5 (4.6 per cent) underwent reimplantation of a previous model. The cuff was placed around the bladder neck in all 9 female patients, whereas in the male patients the cuff was implanted around the bladder neck in 20 and around the bulbous urethra in 80. Thirty-one patients (28.4 per cent), 29 of whom were continent at night, were practicing nocturnal deactivation of the device. Complete post-activation continence was achieved in 91 patients (83.5 per cent), some leakage occurred in 10 (9.2 per cent) and 8 (7.3 per cent) remained incontinent. A total of 23 patients required 1 or more revisions, the most common indications for the first revision being loss of cuff compression (9), tubing kink (3), cuff erosion (3) and infection (2). At the time of this report 89 patients (81.7 per cent) were continent, 9 (8.3 per cent) still had some leakage, 3 (2.8 per cent) were incontinent, 5 (4.6 per cent) were awaiting reimplantation and 3 (2.8 per cent) had died of unrelated causes.
Similar articles
-
Long-term followup of the artificial urinary sphincter.
Diokno AC, Sonda LP, MacGregor RJ. Diokno AC, et al. J Urol. 1984 Jun;131(6):1084-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50823-x. J Urol. 1984. PMID: 6726906
-
Experience with the artificial urinary sphincter model AS800 in 148 patients.
Fishman IJ, Shabsigh R, Scott FB. Fishman IJ, et al. J Urol. 1989 Feb;141(2):307-10. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)40748-8. J Urol. 1989. PMID: 2913350
-
The artificial sphincter AS800 in congenital urinary incontinence.
Gonzalez R, Koleilat N, Austin C, Sidi AA. Gonzalez R, et al. J Urol. 1989 Aug;142(2 Pt 2):512-5; discussion 520-1. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38800-6. J Urol. 1989. PMID: 2746769
-
Mor Y, Leibovitch I, Golomb J, Ben-Chaim J, Nadu A, Pinthus JH, Ramon J. Mor Y, et al. Prog Urol. 2004 Jun;14(3):310-4. Prog Urol. 2004. PMID: 15373171 Review. French.
-
The artificial urinary sphincter.
Mohammed A, Khan A, Shaikh T, Shergill IS, Junaid I. Mohammed A, et al. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007 Jul;4(4):567-75. doi: 10.1586/17434440.4.4.567. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007. PMID: 17605692 Review.
Cited by
-
A Systematic Approach to the Evaluation and Management of the Failed Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
Dobberfuhl AD, Comiter CV. Dobberfuhl AD, et al. Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Mar;18(3):18. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0666-y. Curr Urol Rep. 2017. PMID: 28233225 Review.
-
Herschorn S. Herschorn S. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008 Oct;2(5):536-9. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.924. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008. PMID: 18953453 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Surgery for postprostatectomy incontinence: which procedure for which patient?
Comiter C. Comiter C. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Feb;12(2):91-9. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2014.346. Epub 2015 Jan 6. Nat Rev Urol. 2015. PMID: 25558839 Review.
-
Use of the artificial urinary sphincter in men and women.
Leibovich BC, Barrett DM. Leibovich BC, et al. World J Urol. 1997;15(5):316-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02202018. World J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9372584
-
Artificial urinary sphincter erosion in cardiovascular surgical patients. A cause for concern.
Fishman JR, Stone AR. Fishman JR, et al. West J Med. 1991 Jun;154(6):728-9. West J Med. 1991. PMID: 1877216 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials