pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Investigating How Auditory and Visual Stimuli Promote Recovery After Stress With Potential Applications for Workplace Stress and Burnout: Protocol for a Randomized Trial - PubMed

  • ️Sat Jan 01 2022

Investigating How Auditory and Visual Stimuli Promote Recovery After Stress With Potential Applications for Workplace Stress and Burnout: Protocol for a Randomized Trial

Kunjoon Byun et al. Front Psychol. 2022.

Abstract

Background: Work-related stress is one of the top sources of stress amongst working adults. Relaxation rooms are one organizational strategy being used to reduce workplace stress. Amongst healthcare workers, relaxation rooms have been shown to improve perceived stress levels after 15 min of use. However, few studies have examined physiological and cognitive changes after stress, which may inform why relaxation rooms reduce perceived stress. Understanding the biological mechanisms governing why perceived stress improves when using a relaxation room could lead to more effective strategies to address workplace stress.

Objective: The purpose of this research study is to understand how physiological measures, cognitive performance, and perceived stress change after acute stress and whether certain sensory features of a relaxation room are more effective at promoting recovery from stress.

Methods: 80 healthy adults will perform a stress induction task (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST) to evaluate how physiological and cognitive responses after stress are affected by sensory features of a relaxation room. After the stress induction task, participants will recover for 40 min in a MindBreaks™ relaxation room containing auditory and visual stimuli designed to promote relaxation. Participants will be randomized into four cohorts to experience auditory and visual stimuli; auditory stimuli; visual stimuli; or no stimuli in the room. Measures of heart rate and neural activity will be continuously monitored using wearable devices. Participants will perform working memory assessments and rate their perceived stress levels throughout the experiment. These measures will be compared before and after the stress induction task to determine how different sensory stimuli affect the rate at which individuals recover.

Results: Recruitment started in December 2021 and will continue until December 2022 or until enrollment is completed. Final data collection and subsequent analysis are anticipated by December 2022. We expect all trial results will be available by early 2023.

Discussion: Findings will provide data and information about which sensory features of a relaxation room are most effective at promoting recovery after acute stress. This information will be useful in determining how these features might be effective at creating individualized and organizational strategies for mitigating the effects of workplace stress.

Keywords: burnout; electroencephalography (EEG); heart rate; heart rate variability (HRV); relaxation room; trier social stress test (TSST); working memory; workplace stress.

Copyright © 2022 Byun, Aristizabal, Wu, Mullan, Carlin, West and Mazurek.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This work is supported by Delos Living LLC. This research has been reviewed by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and is being conducted in compliance with Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest policies. Both the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board and the Institutional Review Board have reviewed the Financial Conflict of Interest for KB, SA, YW, JC, and KM related to this research and they have determined that this Financial Conflict of Interest poses no additional significant risk to the welfare of participants in this research project or to the integrity of the research. In alignment with the Financial Conflict of Interest management plan outlined by the Mayo Clinic Conflict of Interest Review Board, the research results for this study will be corroborated by a non-conflicted, non-subordinate staff member with appropriate expertise. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1

Study design flow diagram.

FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2

A timeline of the different epochs of the TSST. Dashed lines indicate time points in the experiment when stress-related surveys are administered (indicated by a △) and/or when working memory assessments (SSPAN, OSPAN) are administered (indicated by a *). Wearable devices are recorded continuously from the start of the Baseline epoch to the end of the Recovery 2 epoch. Measures are aligned around the start of the Stress Induction Task (T + 0min).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alvarsson J. J., Wiens S., Nilsson M. E. (2010). Stress Recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 7 1036–1046. 10.3390/ijerph7031036 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association (2021). Stress in America™ 2021: Stress and Decision-Making During the Pandemic. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    1. An M., Colarelli S. M., O’Brien K., Boyajian M. E. (2016). Why we need more nature at work: effects of natural elements and sunlight on employee mental health and work attitudes. PLoS One 11:e0155614. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155614 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aristizabal S., Byun K., Porter P., Clements N., Campanella C., Li L., et al. (2021a). Biophilic office design: exploring the impact of a multisensory approach on human well-being. J. Environ. Psychol. 77:101682. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101682 - DOI
    1. Aristizabal S., Byun K., Wood N., Mullan A. F., Porter P. M., Campanella C., et al. (2021b). The feasibility of wearable and self-report stress detection measures in a semi-controlled lab environment. IEEE Access 9 102053–102068. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097038 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources