pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Optimization of Printing Parameters to Maximize the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PETG-Based Parts - PubMed

  • ️Sat Jan 01 2022

Optimization of Printing Parameters to Maximize the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed PETG-Based Parts

Sara Valvez et al. Polymers (Basel). 2022.

Abstract

Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is the most popular additive manufacturing method, which allows the production of highly complex three-dimensional parts with minimal material waste. On the other hand, polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) has been used to replace traditional polymers for 3D printing due to its chemical resistance and mechanical performance, among other benefits. However, when fibres are added, these PETG-based composites can be suitable for many different applications. Nevertheless, to guarantee their good performance in-service in these applications, and even extend to new ones, it is necessary for their mechanical properties to be maximized. Therefore, this study intends to optimize the printing parameters (nozzle temperature, printing speed, layer height and filling) in order to maximize the mechanical properties of printed PETG, PETG+CF (carbon fibre-reinforced PETG composites) and PETG+KF (aramid fibre-reinforced PETG composites). The Taguchi method was used for the experimental procedure design, and the specimens were produced according to the L16 orthogonal array. Finally, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, with a 95% confidence interval, to analyse the effect of the printing parameters on the bending properties. It was possible to conclude that the best bending properties for PETG, PETG+CF and PETG+KF were obtained for extrusion temperatures of 265 °C, 195 °C and 265 °C, printing speeds of 20, 60 and 20 mm/s, layer heights of 0.4, 0.53 and 0.35 mm and an infill density of 100% for the three materials, respectively.

Keywords: FFF; additive manufacturing; design of experiments; mechanical properties; mechanical testing; printing parameters; thermal conductivity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Details of the 3D printer used to produce specimens in a temperature and humidity-controlled room.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a) Sample and sensor assembly; (b) samples used in the thermal conductivity tests.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Main effect plot for means of: (a) bending stress, (b) bending modulus, (c) bending strain, and main effect plot for means of S/N ratios of: (d) bending stress, (e) bending modulus, (f) bending strain for PETG samples.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Main effect plot for means of: (a) bending stress, (b) bending modulus, (c) bending strain, and main effect plot for means of S/N ratios of: (d) fexural stress, (e) bending modulus, (f) bending strain for PETG+CF samples.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Main effect plot for means of: (a) bending stress, (b) bending modulus, (c) bending strain, and main effect plot for means of S/N ratios of: (d) bending stress, (e) bending modulus, (f) bending strain for PETG+KF samples.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Pareto diagram for PETG and for: (a) bending stress; (b) bending modulus; (c) bending strain.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Pareto diagram for PETG+CF and for: (a) bending stress; (b) bending modulus; (c) bending strain.

Figure 8
Figure 8

Pareto diagram for PETG+KF and for: (a) bending stress; (b) bending modulus; (c) bending strain.

Figure 9
Figure 9

Bending stress–strain curves showing the: (a) repeatability of the curves for neat PETG; (b) comparison between materials.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fernandez-Vicente M., Calle W., Ferrandiz S., Conejero A. Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2016;3:183–192. doi: 10.1089/3dp.2015.0036. - DOI
    1. Ćwikła G., Grabowik C., Kalinowski K., Paprocka I., Ociepka P. The Influence of Printing Parameters on Selected Mechanical Properties of FDM/FFF 3D-Printed Parts. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017;227:012033. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/227/1/012033. - DOI
    1. Ruban W., Vijayakumar V., Dhanabal P., Pridhar T. Effective Process Parameters in Selective Laser Sintering. Int. J. Rapid Manuf. 2014;4:148. doi: 10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2014.066036. - DOI
    1. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing—General Principles—Terminology. ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2015.
    1. Sood A.K., Ohdar R.K., Mahapatra S.S. Parametric Appraisal of Mechanical Property of Fused Deposition Modelling Processed Parts. Mater. Des. 2010;31:287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources