Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification - PubMed
- ️Sat Jan 01 2022
Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification
D G MacMartin et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022.
Abstract
Making informed future decisions about solar radiation modification (SRM; also known as solar geoengineering)-approaches such as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) that would cool the climate by reflecting sunlight-requires projections of the climate response and associated human and ecosystem impacts. These projections, in turn, will rely on simulations with global climate models. As with climate-change projections, these simulations need to adequately span a range of possible futures, describing different choices, such as start date and temperature target, as well as risks, such as termination or interruptions. SRM modeling simulations to date typically consider only a single scenario, often with some unrealistic or arbitrarily chosen elements (such as starting deployment in 2020), and have often been chosen based on scientific rather than policy-relevant considerations (e.g., choosing quite substantial cooling specifically to achieve a bigger response). This limits the ability to compare risks both between SRM and non-SRM scenarios and between different SRM scenarios. To address this gap, we begin by outlining some general considerations on scenario design for SRM. We then describe a specific set of scenarios to capture a range of possible policy choices and uncertainties and present corresponding SAI simulations intended for broad community use.
Keywords: climate engineering; climate intervention; scenarios; solar geoengineering; solar radiation modification.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interest.
Figures

There are multiple dimensions to future scenarios for SRM: the emission scenario, temperature target, start date, deployment strategy (for SAI, the injection latitudes, seasons, altitude, and material), and other events that might occur, providing a combinatorial challenge. The proposed scenarios are illustrated here and graphically in Fig. 2.

Graphical illustration of scenarios described in Section 3. Simulation results for historical (through 2014) and SSP2-45 (2015 on) are from the CESM2(WACCM6) model, as described in Section 4 (three ensemble members; mean shown in thicker lines); simulation data for the SRM scenarios here are shown in Figs. 3 and 4.

High-level results from simulations involving different temperature targets: global mean temperature; SO2 injection rates; land average precipitation minus evaporation P-E; Arctic September sea-ice extent; total column ozone in southern hemisphere (SH), 60 to 90 °S in October (in Dobson Units, DU); Global Stratospheric Optical Depth; AMOC; and upper ocean heat content (indicative of thermosteric sea-level rise).

High-level results from simulations of different events—termination, interruptions, or a deliberate gradual phaseout. As in Fig. 3.
Similar articles
-
Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool Earth.
Zarnetske PL, Gurevitch J, Franklin J, Groffman PM, Harrison CS, Hellmann JJ, Hoffman FM, Kothari S, Robock A, Tilmes S, Visioni D, Wu J, Xia L, Yang CE. Zarnetske PL, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15):e1921854118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921854118. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021. PMID: 33876741 Free PMC article.
-
Effiong U, Neitzel RL. Effiong U, et al. Environ Health. 2016 Jan 19;15:7. doi: 10.1186/s12940-016-0089-0. Environ Health. 2016. PMID: 26786592 Free PMC article.
-
Wanser K, Doherty SJ, Hurrell JW, Wong A. Wanser K, et al. Clim Change. 2022;174(3-4):23. doi: 10.1007/s10584-022-03446-4. Epub 2022 Oct 17. Clim Change. 2022. PMID: 36277044 Free PMC article.
-
Ecosystem impacts of geoengineering: a review for developing a science plan.
Russell LM, Rasch PJ, Mace GM, Jackson RB, Shepherd J, Liss P, Leinen M, Schimel D, Vaughan NE, Janetos AC, Boyd PW, Norby RJ, Caldeira K, Merikanto J, Artaxo P, Melillo J, Morgan MG. Russell LM, et al. Ambio. 2012 Jun;41(4):350-69. doi: 10.1007/s13280-012-0258-5. Epub 2012 Mar 20. Ambio. 2012. PMID: 22430307 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols.
Rasch PJ, Tilmes S, Turco RP, Robock A, Oman L, Chen CC, Stenchikov GL, Garcia RR. Rasch PJ, et al. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008 Nov 13;366(1882):4007-37. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0131. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2008. PMID: 18757276 Review.
Cited by
-
Hueholt DM, Barnes EA, Hurrell JW, Morrison AL. Hueholt DM, et al. Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 18;15(1):3332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47656-z. Nat Commun. 2024. PMID: 38637548 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal climate intervention scenarios for crop production vary by nation.
Clark B, Xia L, Robock A, Tilmes S, Richter JH, Visioni D, Rabin SS. Clark B, et al. Nat Food. 2023 Oct;4(10):902-911. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00853-3. Epub 2023 Oct 5. Nat Food. 2023. PMID: 37798559
References
-
- Anderson K., Broderick J. F., Stoddard I., A factor of two: How the mitigation plans of ‘climate progressive’ nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways. Clim. Policy 20, 1290–1304 (2020).
-
- Rogelj J., et al. ., Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature 534, 631–639 (2016). - PubMed
-
- Bjordal J., Storelvmo T., Alterskjaer K., Carlsen T., Equilibrium climate sensitivity above 5 ∘C plausible due to state-dependent cloud feedback. Nat. Geosci. 13, 718–721 (2020).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous