Ethical and methodological challenges slowing progress in primary care-based suicide prevention: Illustrations from a randomized controlled trial and guidance for future research - PubMed
Randomized Controlled Trial
doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.038. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
Paul R Duberstein 2 , Richard L Kravitz 3 , Evan M Kleiman 4 , Shireen L Rizvi 5 , Camille Cipri 6 , David Liu 7 , Lorin Scher 7 , Melissa Freitas 8 , Malaika Jones-Hill 9 , Aaron Oravetz 6 , Kimberly A Van Orden 10 , Peter Franks 11
Affiliations
- PMID: 35961180
- PMCID: PMC10124132
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.07.038
Randomized Controlled Trial
Ethical and methodological challenges slowing progress in primary care-based suicide prevention: Illustrations from a randomized controlled trial and guidance for future research
Anthony Jerant et al. J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Oct.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite the pressing need for primary care-based suicide prevention initiatives and growing acknowledgement of recruitment difficulties and Institutional Review Board (IRB) challenges in suicide research, we are aware of no illustrative examples describing how IRB decisions in the design of a primary care trial can compound recruitment challenges.
Methods: The CDC-funded trial (NCT02986113) of Men and Providers Preventing Suicide aimed to examine the effects of a tailored computer program encourage men with suicidal thoughts (n = 304, ages 35-64) to discuss suicide with a primary care clinician and accept treatment. Before a visit, participants viewed MAPS or a non-tailored control video. Post-visit, both arms were offered telephone collaborative care, as mandated by the institutional review board (IRB). We previously showed that exposure to MAPs led to improvements in communication about suicide in a primary care visit. In this paper, we report data on the study's primary outcome, suicide preparatory behaviors.
Results: After screening nearly 4100 men, 48 enrolled. Recruitment challenges, which were exacerabted by an IRB mandate narrowing post-intervention patient management differences between trial arms, limited detection of the effects of MAPS on suicide preparatory behaviors.
Conclusions: While primary care settings are key sites for suicide prevention trials, issues such as recruitment difficulties and overly restrictive IRB requirements may limit their utility. Methodological innovation to improve recruitment and ethical guidance to inform IRB decision-making are needed.
Keywords: Help-seeking behavior; Institutional review board; Men's health; Patient activation; Physician-patient relations; Primary care; Research ethics; Suicide; Tailored interventions.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures
![Figure 1.](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a729/10124132/5a306b0c272d/nihms-1884790-f0001.gif)
Abbreviations: MAPS, Men and Providers Preventing Suicide; PCC, primary care clinician; TCC, telephone collaborative care
![Figure 2.](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a729/10124132/bd0821ad8601/nihms-1884790-f0002.gif)
Abbreviations: MAPS, Men and Providers Preventing Suicide; PCC, primary care clinician *Basic structure of tailoring in each module: (1) give all users brief feedback tailored to their response(s) to relevant question(s); (2) offer the option to view more-detailed information
![Figure 3.](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a729/10124132/a7fe9a8bc804/nihms-1884790-f0003.gif)
Abbreviations: PCC, primary care clinician; TCC, telephone collaborative care
Similar articles
-
Jerant A, Duberstein P, Kravitz RL, Stone DM, Cipri C, Franks P. Jerant A, et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jul;35(7):2050-2058. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05769-3. Epub 2020 Mar 17. J Gen Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32185660 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Bruce ML, Ten Have TR, Reynolds CF 3rd, Katz II, Schulberg HC, Mulsant BH, Brown GK, McAvay GJ, Pearson JL, Alexopoulos GS. Bruce ML, et al. JAMA. 2004 Mar 3;291(9):1081-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.9.1081. JAMA. 2004. PMID: 14996777 Clinical Trial.
-
Coppersmith DDL, Dempsey W, Kleiman EM, Bentley KH, Murphy SA, Nock MK. Coppersmith DDL, et al. Psychiatry. 2022 Winter;85(4):317-333. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2022.2092828. Epub 2022 Jul 18. Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35848800 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A systematic review of elderly suicide prevention programs.
Lapierre S, Erlangsen A, Waern M, De Leo D, Oyama H, Scocco P, Gallo J, Szanto K, Conwell Y, Draper B, Quinnett P; International Research Group for Suicide among the Elderly. Lapierre S, et al. Crisis. 2011;32(2):88-98. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000076. Crisis. 2011. PMID: 21602163 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Andriessen K, Reifels L, Krysinska K, Robinson J, Dempster G, & Pirkis J (2019). Ethical concerns in suicide research: Results of an international researcher survey. Journal of empirical research on human research ethics, 14(4), 383–394. - PubMed
-
- Beck AT, Steer RA, & Ranieri WF (1988). Scale for suicide ideation: Psychometric properties of a self-report version. Journal of clinical psychology, 44(4), 499–505. - PubMed
-
- Brown GK, Beck AT, Steer RA, & Grisham JR (2000). Risk factors for suicide in psychiatric outpatients: a 20-year prospective study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 371–377. - PubMed