Madness of the crowd: Understanding mass behaviors through a multidisciplinary lens - PubMed
- ️Sat Jan 01 2022
Review
Madness of the crowd: Understanding mass behaviors through a multidisciplinary lens
Emily Brindal et al. Front Psychol. 2022.
Abstract
Mass or crowd behaviors refer to those that occur at a group level and suggest that crowds behave differently to individuals. Mass behaviors are typically triggered by a significant societal event. The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has provided many tangible examples of crowd behaviors that have been observed globally, suggesting possible common underlying drivers. It is important to provide a deeper understanding of such behaviors to develop mitigation strategies for future population-level challenges. To gain deeper insight into a variety of crowd behaviors, we perform a conceptual analysis of crowd behaviors using three detailed case studies covering observable behavior (panic buying and health protective actions) and mass beliefs (conspiracy theories) that have resulted or shifted throughout the pandemic. The aim of this review was to explored key triggers, psychological drivers, and possible mitigation strategies through a mixture of theory and published literature. Finally, we create experimental mathematical models to support each case study and to illustrate the effects of manipulating key behavioral factors. Overall, our analyses identified several commonalties across the case studies and revealed the importance of Social Identity Theory and concepts of trust, social connection, and stress.
Keywords: conformity; conspiracy theories; crowd behavior; health protective behaviors; modeling; panic buying; social networks; social norms.
Copyright © 2022 Brindal, Kakoschke, Reeson and Evans.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures

Growth in household spending on goods, by category, Australia 2020. Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics, Insights into household consumption, December quarter 2020 3/03/2021.

Equilibrium levels of panic buying for products with differing visibility.

The small world model with N = 8, k = 4 and rewiring probabilities p = 0 (left), giving a ring lattice, and p = 0.2 (right).

Individuals’ initial scores. Any agent with a score above zero does the behaviour. In the ring lattice the ith agent’s immediate neighbours are the i−1th and i+1th agents. Since the agents are located on a ring, the neighbours of agent i=1 are agents i=2 and i=500.

Agents’ initial and final scores in small-world networks with different rewiring probabilities: 0.1 (A), 0.2 (B) and 0.3 (C).

The spread of a conspiracy theory in a population; around half of the individuals remain ‘infected’ with the conspiracy belief in this baseline scenario.

The spread of a conspiracy theory in a population, in which it is less likely that believers will be able to interact with other believers, resulting in a lower equilibrium number of ‘infected’ individuals.

The spread of a conspiracy theory infection through a population, where believers cannot reinforce each other’s beliefs. The conspiracy theory dies out under these settings.

The spread of a conspiracy theory infection through a population, with cumulative social influence from non-susceptible individuals on susceptible individuals. Again, the CT dies out as believers are convinced of their error.
Similar articles
-
Walking together: behavioural signatures of psychological crowds.
Templeton A, Drury J, Philippides A. Templeton A, et al. R Soc Open Sci. 2018 Jul 25;5(7):180172. doi: 10.1098/rsos.180172. eCollection 2018 Jul. R Soc Open Sci. 2018. PMID: 30109073 Free PMC article.
-
Jordan JW, Stalgaitis CA, Charles J, Madden PA, Radhakrishnan AG, Saggese D. Jordan JW, et al. Health Educ Behav. 2019 Feb;46(1):40-52. doi: 10.1177/1090198118759148. Epub 2018 Mar 15. Health Educ Behav. 2019. PMID: 29540080
-
Rajkumar RP. Rajkumar RP. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 24;12:652353. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.652353. eCollection 2021. Front Psychiatry. 2021. PMID: 33716838 Free PMC article. Review.
-
From Mindless Masses to Small Groups: Conceptualizing Collective Behavior in Crowd Modeling.
Templeton A, Drury J, Philippides A. Templeton A, et al. Rev Gen Psychol. 2015 Sep;19(3):215-229. doi: 10.1037/gpr0000032. Epub 2015 Aug 17. Rev Gen Psychol. 2015. PMID: 26388685 Free PMC article.
-
Belief in conspiracy theories and non-normative behavior.
Pummerer L. Pummerer L. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Oct;47:101394. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101394. Epub 2022 Jun 18. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35863102 Review.
Cited by
-
Ryan M, Brindal E, Roberts M, Hickson RI. Ryan M, et al. J R Soc Interface. 2024 Jun;21(215):20240038. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0038. Epub 2024 Jun 5. J R Soc Interface. 2024. PMID: 38835247 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Amblard F., Deffuant G. (2004). The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A 343, 725–738. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2004.06.102 - DOI
-
- Banerjee A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. Q. J. Econ. 107, 797–817. doi: 10.2307/2118364 - DOI
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources