Influence of plant domestication on plant-pollinator interactions: Floral attributes and floral visitor communities in wild and cultivated squash plants - PubMed

doi: 10.1002/ajb2.16170. Epub 2023 May 18.

Premise: Domestication of plant species results in phenotypic modifications and changes in biotic interactions. Most studies have compared antagonistic plant-herbivore interactions of domesticated plants and their wild relatives, but little attention has been given to how domestication influences plant-pollinator interactions. Floral attributes and interactions of floral visitors were compared between sister taxa of the genus Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae), the domesticated C. moschata, C. argyrosperma ssp. argyrosperma and its wild progenitor C. argyrosperma ssp. sororia in the place of origin.

Methods: We conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to compare floral morphological traits and analyzed floral reward (nectar and pollen) quantity and quality between flowers of wild and domesticated Cucurbita taxa. Staminate and pistillate flowers of all three taxa were video recorded, and visitation and behavior of floral visitors were registered and analyzed.

Results: Most floral morphological characteristics of flowers of domesticated taxa were larger in both staminate and pistillate flowers. Staminate and pistillate flowers presented distinct correlations between floral traits and integration indices between domesticated and wild species. Additionally, pollen quantity and protein to lipid ratio were greater in domesticated species. Cucurbit pollen specialists, Eucera spp., had the highest probability of visit for all Cucurbita taxa.

Conclusions: We provide evidence that floral traits of domesticated and wild Cucurbita species experienced different selection pressures. Domesticated Cucurbita species may have more resources invested towards floral traits, thereby increasing attractiveness to pollinators and potentially plant reproductive success. Wild ancestor plant populations should be conserved in their centers of origin to preserve plant-pollinator interactions.

REFERENCES

1. 1. Armbruster, W. S. 1991. Multilevel analysis of morphometric data from natural plant populations: Insights into ontogenetic, genetic, and selective correlations in Dalechampia scandens. Evolution 45: 1229-1244.
2. 1. Armbruster, W. S., V. S. Di Stilio, J. D. Tuxill, T. C. Flores, and J. L. Velásquez Runk. 1999. Covariance and decoupling of floral and vegetative traits in nine neotropical plants: A re-evaluation of Berg's Correlation-Pleiades concept. American Journal of Botany 86: 39-55.
3. 1. Armbruster, W. S., C. Pelabon, T. F. Hansen, and C. P. H. Mulder. 2004. Floral integration, modularity, and accuracy: Distinguishing complex adaptations from genetic constraints. In M. Pigliucci and K. Preston [eds.], Phenotypic integration: Studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes, 23-79. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
4. 1. Artz, D. R., and B. A. Nault. 2011. Performance of Apis mellifera, Bombus impatiens, and Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as pollinators of pumpkin. Journal of Economic Entomology 104: 1153-1161.
5. 1. Ashworth, L., R. Aguilar, S. Martén-Rodríguez, M. Lopezaraiza-Mikel, G. Avila-Sakar, V. Rosas-Guerrero, and M. Quesada. 2015. Pollination syndromes: A global pattern of convergent evolution driven by the most effective pollinator. In P. Pontarotti [ed.], Evolutionary biology: Biodiversification from genotype, 203-224. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland.