Comparative study of electrophysiological and psychophysical measurement of the contrast sensitivity function in humans - PubMed
Comparative Study
Comparative study of electrophysiological and psychophysical measurement of the contrast sensitivity function in humans
D Allen et al. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 Jun.
Abstract
We measured the human contrast sensitivity function (CSF) both electrophysiologically with the steady-state visual evoked potential (VEP) and psychophysically using a method of ascending limits. VEP contrast thresholds were determined using a rapid recording technique in which the contrast of a counterphase modulated sine wave grating was swept logarithmically from 0.5 to 40% over a period of 10 s. For this pattern reversal stimulus the amplitude and phase of the second harmonic response as a function of contrast were measured using a discrete Fourier transform (DFT). Psychophysical thresholds were determined on the same trials used to record the VEP. Near threshold the VEP amplitude vs. contrast function was approximately linear and VEP contrast thresholds were estimated by a linear extrapolation to zero amplitude. The contrast thresholds obtained by the two methods correlated at 0.914 for 5 observers, with a mean discrepancy of only 12%. At higher contrasts, the VEP amplitude vs. contrast function often became nonmonotonic, sometimes showing two amplitude peaks.
Similar articles
-
Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity using the steady-state visual evoked potential.
Chen SA, Wu LZ, Wu DZ. Chen SA, et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990 Sep;75(2):145-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00146550. Doc Ophthalmol. 1990. PMID: 2276315
-
Souza GS, Gomes BD, Saito CA, da Silva Filho M, Silveira LC. Souza GS, et al. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Jul;48(7):3396-404. doi: 10.1167/iovs.07-0018. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007. PMID: 17591914
-
Electrophysiological assessment of contrast sensitivity in human infants.
Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Allen D. Norcia AM, et al. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986 Jan;63(1):12-5. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198601000-00003. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1986. PMID: 3942183
-
Electrophysiological and psychophysical testing of vision in glaucoma.
Bodis-Wollner I. Bodis-Wollner I. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989 Feb;33 Suppl:301-7. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989. PMID: 2655143 Review.
-
Yarnitsky D. Yarnitsky D. Muscle Nerve. 1997 Feb;20(2):198-204. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199702)20:2<198::aid-mus10>3.0.co;2-#. Muscle Nerve. 1997. PMID: 9040659 Review.
Cited by
-
The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.
Norcia AM, Appelbaum LG, Ales JM, Cottereau BR, Rossion B. Norcia AM, et al. J Vis. 2015;15(6):4. doi: 10.1167/15.6.4. J Vis. 2015. PMID: 26024451 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Curve Visible on the Campbell-Robson Chart Is Not the Contrast Sensitivity Function.
Tardif J, Watson MR, Giaschi D, Gosselin F. Tardif J, et al. Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 9;15:626466. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.626466. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33767608 Free PMC article.
-
Fischer QS, Aleem S, Zhou H, Pham TA. Fischer QS, et al. Learn Mem. 2007 Aug 29;14(9):573-80. doi: 10.1101/lm.676707. Print 2007 Sep. Learn Mem. 2007. PMID: 17761542 Free PMC article.
-
Threshold determination in sweep VEP and the effects of criterion.
Yadav NK, Almoqbel F, Head L, Irving EL, Leat SJ. Yadav NK, et al. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009 Oct;119(2):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s10633-009-9177-6. Epub 2009 Jun 24. Doc Ophthalmol. 2009. PMID: 19554357
-
Evaluation of Agreement Between Sweep Visual Evoked Potential Testing and Subjective Visual Acuity.
Polat OA, Şener H, Çetinkaya Z, Arda H. Polat OA, et al. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 19;53(5):289-293. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2023.37622. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2023. PMID: 37867963 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources