Decriminalization thresholds for drug possession: A multi-criteria policy analysis framework - PubMed

Background: Decriminalization of personal possession of drugs has been proposed as an approach to mitigate the harms of drug prohibition. Despite growing interest, particularly in Canadian settings, analyses of approaches to defining the parameters of what constitutes personal possession within decriminalization models are lacking. Using the Province of British Columbia, Canada, as a case study, we undertook an evidence-based multi-criteria policy analysis of three models for defining personal possession: 1) a model that defines personal possession as the absence of evidence of drug trafficking; 2) a cumulative threshold of 15 grams; and 3) a cumulative threshold of 2.5 grams.

Methods: We utilized data from four sources: qualitative interviews with 16 experts, including representatives from government and law enforcement; Vancouver Police drug seizure data; self-reported drug consumption data from longitudinal cohorts of people who use drugs in Vancouver; and publicly available government documents (e.g., the Government of BC's submission for decriminalization). Data was used to identify and define evaluation criteria which reflect the stated policy objectives of decriminalization alongside other policy considerations. This framework was used to conduct a multi-criteria policy analysis of the three different models.

Results: The seven evaluation criteria included: 1) reduction in interactions with police; 2) reduction of police drug seizures; 3) coverage for those with high consumption; 4) impact on equity-deserving groups; and acceptance on the part key stakeholders, including: 5) people who use drugs; 6) law enforcement; and 7) the public. The model that performed the best was the cumulative threshold model of 15 grams.

Conclusion: Findings highlight that different threshold models advance and constrain the stated policy objectives of drug decriminalization to varying degrees. This analysis provides a framework that other jurisdictions considering decriminalization could use to help inform determinations of threshold levels based on stated policy objectives.

1. 1. Ahern J, Stuber J, & Galea S (2006). Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88(2), 188–196. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.014 - DOI - PubMed
2. 1. Amato S (2022, April 19). Edmonton to ask Ottawa for drug decriminalization, despite objections of 2 councillors. CTV News. https://edmonton.ctvnews.ca/edmonton-to-ask-ottawa-for-drug-decriminaliz...
3. 1. Amnesty International Canada, Association des intervenants en dépendance du Québec (AIDQ), Association des intervenants en dépendance du Québec (AIDQ), BC Association of Aboriginal Friendship Centres, BC Civil Liberties Association, Canadian Association of People Who Use Drugs (CAPUD), Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy (National), Canadian Students for Sensible Drug Policy Vancouver, Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, Each+Every, Harm Reduction Nurses Association, HIV Legal Network, Moms Stop the Harm, Pivot Legal Society, South Riverdale Community Health Centre (Toronto), & Thunderbird Partnership Foundation. (2021, May 11). Decriminalization Done Right: A Human Rights and Public Health Vision for Drug Policy Reform. https://www.drugpolicy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Decrim-Done-Right-S...
4. 1. Association des intervenants en dépendance du Québec, Association québécoise pour la promotion de la santé des personnes utilisatrices de drogues, BC Association of Aboriginal Friendship Centres, BC Centre on Substance Use, British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, CACTUS Montréal, Canadian Association of People Who Use Drugs, Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, Canadian Drug Policy Coalition, Cannabis Amnesty, Centre on Drug Policy Evaluation, Community-Based Research Centre, Drug User Liberation Front, Harm Reduction Nurses Association, HIV Legal Network, MAPS Canada, Moms Stop the Harm, Pivot Legal Society, South Riverdale Community Health Centre, … Toronto Overdose Prevention Society. (2021). Decriminalization Done Right: A Rights-Based Path for Drug Policy. https://d3n8a8pro7vhmx.cloudfront.net/pivotlegal/pages/3615/attachments/...
5. 1. BC Centre for Disease Control. (2021). Top Causes of Death – BCCDC and Vital Statistics. https://bccdc.shinyapps.io/Mortality_Context_ShinyApp/