Popularity and Entropy in Friendship and Enmity Networks in Classrooms - PubMed
- ️Sun Jan 01 2023
Popularity and Entropy in Friendship and Enmity Networks in Classrooms
Diego B Sánchez-Espinosa et al. Entropy (Basel). 2023.
Abstract
Looking for regular statistical trends of relations in schools, we constructed 42 independent weighted directed networks of simultaneous friendship and animosity from surveys we made in the Mexico City Metropolitan area in classrooms with students of different ages and levels by asking them to nominate and order five friends and five foes. However, the data show that older students nominated fewer than the five required five foes. Although each classroom was independent of the others, we found several general trends involving students of different ages and grade levels. In all classrooms, friendship entropy was found to be higher than enmity entropy, indicating that fewer students received enmity links than received friendship nominations. Popular agents exhibited more reciprocal nominations among themselves than less popular agents, and opposite-sex friendships increased with age.
Keywords: enmity networks; friendship networks; local entropy; popularity; weighted networks.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63ec4/63ec46a9b80558d10bef8dc06bd3558ad22a61ad" alt="Figure 1"
This bar plot displays the total number of students and teachers in each classroom, categorized by genre and ordered from the lowest average age starting from the left.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77849/778494758d17eed11fbb11ada4950f09250a7815" alt="Figure 2"
Example networks with only friendship and only enmity shown separately for the same classroom. The thickness corresponds to the intensity of the relationship, with thinner lines indicating intensity 1 and thicker lines indicating intensity 5. (a) Subnetwork with only friendship ties; (b) Subnetwork with only enmity ties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ee33/1ee33f2b87cd632e81e342f28bfbe22528fcd005" alt="Figure 3"
Same as Figure 2, except showing subnetworks with only reciprocal links. The thickness corresponds to the intensity of the relationship, with thinner lines indicating intensity 1 and thicker lines indicating intensity 5. (a) Subnetwork with reciprocal friendship ties; (b) Subnetwork with reciprocal enmity ties.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c555/8c555c3702cc980c9c6196acee5095b1db9a4342" alt="Figure 4"
(Left panel): classroom networks with 36 nodes (students) indicated by gender, average age 13.74 years old. Node colors correspond to the total strength, with red indicating negative total strength (indicative of enmity) and white indicating positive total strength (indicative of friendship). (Right panel): corresponding scatterplot of received individual friendship and enmity entropy values. Only those members with nonzero receiving input links for both friendship and enmity are shown.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d6037/d60376e664327c6b31014734b8bc781789595ab5" alt="Figure 5"
Average input entropy values for friendly relationships (green) and enmity relationships (red) of 42 classrooms networks, sorted in ascending order from left to right according to average age.
Similar articles
-
Friendship Concept and Community Network Structure among Elementary School and University Students.
Hernández-Hernández AM, Viga-de Alva D, Huerta-Quintanilla R, Canto-Lugo E, Laviada-Molina H, Molina-Segui F. Hernández-Hernández AM, et al. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 19;11(10):e0164886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164886. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27760171 Free PMC article.
-
Palacios D, Dijkstra JK, Villalobos C, Treviño E, Berger C, Huisman M, Veenstra R. Palacios D, et al. J Sch Psychol. 2019 Jun;74:58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 28. J Sch Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31213232
-
Sadilek M, Klimek P, Thurner S. Sadilek M, et al. J Comput Soc Sci. 2018;1(1):227-239. doi: 10.1007/s42001-017-0010-9. Epub 2017 Dec 22. J Comput Soc Sci. 2018. PMID: 31930177 Free PMC article.
-
D'Haem J. D'Haem J. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2008 Oct;12(2):107-11. doi: 10.3104/practice.2012. Downs Syndr Res Pract. 2008. PMID: 19026282 Review.
-
Munniksma A, Scheepers P, Stark TH, Tolsma J. Munniksma A, et al. J Res Adolesc. 2017 Mar;27(1):20-33. doi: 10.1111/jora.12248. Epub 2016 Jan 20. J Res Adolesc. 2017. PMID: 28498532 Review.
Cited by
-
Modelling the creation of friends and foes groups in small real social networks.
García-Rodríguez A, Govezensky T, Naumis GG, Barrio RA. García-Rodríguez A, et al. PLoS One. 2024 Feb 27;19(2):e0298791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298791. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38412166 Free PMC article.
-
Stability of the personal relationship networks in a longitudinal study of middle school students.
Escribano D, Lapuente FJ, Cuesta JA, Dunbar RIM, Sánchez A. Escribano D, et al. Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 4;13(1):14575. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41787-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37666889 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Laursen B.P. Close Friendships in Adolescence. Jossey-Bass, Inc.; San Francisco, CA, USA: 1993.
-
- Hartup W.W. The Three Faces of Friendship. J. Soc. Pers. Relationsh. 1995;12:569–574. doi: 10.1177/0265407595124012. - DOI
-
- Vitaro F., Boivin M., Bukowski W.M. The role of friendship in child and adolescent psychosocial development. In: Rubin K.H., Bukowski W.M., Laursen B., editors. Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships, and Groups. The Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2009. pp. 568–585.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources