pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Measuring Time Preferences - PubMed

Measuring Time Preferences

Jonathan Cohen et al. J Econ Lit. 2020 Jun.

Abstract

We review research that measures time preferences-i.e., preferences over intertemporal tradeoffs. We distinguish between studies using financial flows, which we call "money earlier or later" (MEL) decisions and studies that use time-dated consumption/effort. Under different structural models, we show how to translate what MEL experiments directly measure (required rates of return for financial flows) into a discount function over utils. We summarize empirical regularities found in MEL studies and the predictive power of those studies. We explain why MEL choices are driven in part by some factors that are distinct from underlying time preferences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Distribution of Characteristics for Recent Empirical Discounting Papers.

Note: Result of the following Google Scholar Search conducted August 2014: (discount OR discounting) AND utility AND “intertemporal choice" AND “time preferences” AND "standard errors". After eliminating duplicates and reprints, 222 publications remain. Year of publication min =1980, max=2014, mean=2009.8. Papers may appear more than once in the “Lab or Field,” “Linear Utility,” and “Rewards” columns if they fit more than one category (e.g. a paper with a lab and a field component”). The “Intertemporal Substitution” column classifies whether a paper allowed for the possibility that individuals might substitute consumption across time when estimating its discounting model (“Yes”) or assumed individuals consumed money or other rewards when they were received (“No”). The “Linear Utility” column classifies whether the paper’s model allows for non-linear utility functions in its model. The “Exponential”, “Hyperbolic”, and “Quasi-Hyperbolic” indicate whether any of those discount functions were estimated in the paper.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.. The Shape of Different Discount Functions.

Plots of the exponential δτ with δ = 0.944, hyperbolic (1 + ατ)−γ/α with α = 4, γ = 1, and quasi-hyperbolic β1(τ<0)δτ with β = 0.7, δ = 0.957.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdellaoui Mohammed, Attema Arthur E., and Bleichrodt Han. 2010. “Intertemporal Tradeoffs for Gains and Losses: An Experimental Measurement of Discounted Utility.” The Economic Journal 120 (545): 845–66. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2009.02308.x. - DOI
    1. Abdellaoui Mohammed, Kemel Emmanuel, Panin Amma, and Vieider Ferdinand M. (2017). “Take your Time or Take your Chance: Time Discounting as a Distorted Probability.” Working Paper.
    1. Abel Andrew B. 1990. “Asset Prices under Habit Formation and Catching up with the Joneses.” The American Economic Review; 80 (2): 38–42.
    1. Ahlbrecht Martin, and Weber Martin. 1997. “An Empirical Study on Intertemporal Decision Making Under Risk.” Management Science 43 (6): 813–26. doi:10.1287/mnsc.43.6.813. - DOI
    1. Ainslie George. 1975. “Specious Reward: A Behavioral Theory of Impulsiveness and Impulse Control.” Psychological Bulletin 82 (4): 463–96. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources