pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Combined Neurological Syndrome in Electrohypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A Clinical Study of 2018 Cases - PubMed

  • ️Sun Jan 01 2023

Combined Neurological Syndrome in Electrohypersensitivity and Multiple Chemical Sensitivity: A Clinical Study of 2018 Cases

Dominique Belpomme et al. J Clin Med. 2023.

Abstract

From a cohort of 2018 evaluable consecutive cases issued from the European Clinical Trial Database, we describe the complete clinical symptomatic presentation of electrohypersensitivity (EHS) and multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) and their association in the framework of a unique, sensitivity-related environmental neurologic syndrome. Eligibility criteria are those of the Atlanta consensus meeting for MCS, and those of WHO for EHS. There were 1428 EHS, 85 MCS and 505 EHS/MCS evaluable cases, so EHS was associated with MCS in 25%. Women appeared to be much more susceptible to EHS and/or to MCS than men, with no statistical significance between the EHS and MCS groups (p = 0.07), but the combined group revealed a more significant female sex ratio of 80.4% (p < 0.0001). All symptoms except emotional behavior were significantly more frequent in EHS patients than in healthy controls (p < 0.0001). We found no pathognomonic symptoms to establish the diagnosis of both disorders or to distinguish EHS from MCS. The three groups of patients were found to share identical symptoms, while several symptoms were found to be more significantly frequent in EHS/MCS than in EHS (p < 0.0001). From these data, we suggest that EHS and MCS are new brain disorders, generated via a common etiopathogenic mechanism.

Keywords: combined sensitivity-related neurologic syndrome; electrohypersensitivity; electromagnetic field; etiopathogenic mechanism; idiopathic environmental intolerance; multiple chemical sensitivity; radiofrequency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Relative number of patients in different age categories: the EHS group (A) compared to the MCS group (B) and EHS/MCS combined group (C), and the total 2018 investigated cases (D).

Similar articles

References

    1. Randolph T.G. Human Ecology and Susceptibility to the Chemical Environment. Charles C Thomas; Springfield, IL, USA: 1962.
    1. Rea W.J., Pan Y., Fenyves E.F., Sujisawa I., Suyama H., Samadi N., Ross G.H. Electromagnetic field sensitivity. J. Bioelectr. 1991;10:214–256. doi: 10.3109/15368379109031410. - DOI
    1. Bartha L., Baumzweiger W., Buscher D.S., Callender T., Dahl K.A., Davidoff A., Donnay A., Edelson S.B., Elson B.D., Elliott E., et al. Multiple chemical sensitivity: A 1999 consensus. Arch. Environ. Health. 1999;54:147–149. - PubMed
    1. Mild K.H., Repacholi M., van Deventer E., Ravazzani P. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity; Proceedings of the WHO International Seminar and Working Group Meeting on EMF Hypersensitivity; Prague, Czech Republic. 25–27 October 2004; Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006.
    1. WHO (World Health Organization) Electromagnetic Fields and Public Health, Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2005. WHO Fact Sheet No. 296.

Grants and funding

This research was funded by the Association for Research on Treatment against Cancer (ARTAC) grant number 10092023.

LinkOut - more resources