Non-invasive neuromodulation of cerebello-hippocampal volume-behavior relationships - PubMed
- ️Mon Jan 01 2024
Non-invasive neuromodulation of cerebello-hippocampal volume-behavior relationships
Thamires N C Magalhães et al. bioRxiv. 2024.
Abstract
The study here explores the link between transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and brain-behavior relationships. We propose that tDCS may indirectly influence the complex relationships between brain volume and behavior. We focused on the dynamics between the hippocampus (HPC) and cerebellum (CB) in cognitive processes, a relationship with significant implications for understanding memory and motor skills. Seventy-four young adults (mean age: 22±0.42 years, mean education: 14.7±0.25 years) were randomly assigned to receive either anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation. Following stimulation, participants completed computerized tasks assessing working memory and sequence learning in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. We investigated the statistical interaction between CB and HPC volumes. Our findings showed that individuals with larger cerebellar volumes had shorter reaction times (RT) on a high-load working memory task in the sham stimulation group. In contrast, the anodal stimulation group exhibited faster RTs during the low-load working memory condition. These RT differences were associated with the cortical volumetric interaction between CB-HPC. Literature suggests that anodal stimulation down-regulates the CB and here, those with larger volumes perform more quickly, suggesting the potential need for additional cognitive resources to compensate for cerebellar downregulation. This new insight suggests that tDCS can aid in revealing structure-function relationships, due to greater performance variability, especially in young adults. It may also reveal new targets of interest in the study of aging or in diseases where there is also greater behavioral variability.
Keywords: brain-behavior; cerebellum; cognitive process; cortical volumetric interaction; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).
Conflict of interest statement
7.Competing Interests The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2eee/f2eeec2725194dc5539a321f42891407ca6dbbd9" alt="Figure 1."
Illustrated the correlation analysis between mean scores of high reaction time (RT) in the Sternberg test and the left cerebellar volume across three different stimulation groups (Sham, Cathodal, and Anodal). Notably, the green line representing the Sham group yielded a significant result.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226d8/226d8ffc84a690b0e112039654f3e32d9706d1a0" alt="Figure 2."
The anodal stimulation group exhibited a cortical volumetric interaction between the right cerebellum and left hippocampus (CB-HPC R*L) during the mean reaction time (RT) in low-load blocks of the Sternberg test.
Similar articles
-
Cerebellar-hippocampal volume associations with behavioral outcomes following tDCS modulation.
Magalhães TNC, Maldonado T, Jackson TB, Hicks TH, Herrejon IA, Rezende TJR, Symm AC, Bernard JA. Magalhães TNC, et al. Brain Imaging Behav. 2025 Feb 4. doi: 10.1007/s11682-025-00975-1. Online ahead of print. Brain Imaging Behav. 2025. PMID: 39904871
-
Voegtle A, Terlutter C, Nikolai K, Farahat A, Hinrichs H, Sweeney-Reed CM. Voegtle A, et al. Cerebellum. 2023 Dec;22(6):1152-1165. doi: 10.1007/s12311-022-01487-0. Epub 2022 Oct 14. Cerebellum. 2023. PMID: 36239839 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ballard HK, Goen JRM, Maldonado T, Bernard JA. Ballard HK, et al. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Aug 1;122(2):490-499. doi: 10.1152/jn.00036.2019. Epub 2019 Jun 5. J Neurophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31166807
-
Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.
Grimaldi G, Argyropoulos GP, Boehringer A, Celnik P, Edwards MJ, Ferrucci R, Galea JM, Groiss SJ, Hiraoka K, Kassavetis P, Lesage E, Manto M, Miall RC, Priori A, Sadnicka A, Ugawa Y, Ziemann U. Grimaldi G, et al. Cerebellum. 2014 Feb;13(1):121-38. doi: 10.1007/s12311-013-0514-7. Cerebellum. 2014. PMID: 23943521
-
Narmashiri A, Akbari F. Narmashiri A, et al. Neuropsychol Rev. 2023 Dec 7. doi: 10.1007/s11065-023-09627-x. Online ahead of print. Neuropsychol Rev. 2023. PMID: 38060075 Review.
Cited by
-
Antipova V, Heimes D, Seidel K, Schulz J, Schmitt O, Holzmann C, Rolfs A, Bidmon HJ, González de San Román Martín E, Huesgen PF, Amunts K, Keiler J, Hammer N, Witt M, Wree A. Antipova V, et al. Front Neuroanat. 2024 Jul 16;18:1430790. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2024.1430790. eCollection 2024. Front Neuroanat. 2024. PMID: 39081805 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anguera J.A., et al., Contributions of spatial working memory to visuomotor learning. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2010. 22(9). (b) - PubMed
-
- Antal A., et al., Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2004. 45(2). - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources