pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PM415 as a potential bio-preserving probiotic - PubMed

  • ️Mon Jan 01 2024

Characterization of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PM415 as a potential bio-preserving probiotic

Jingkang Ye et al. Arch Microbiol. 2024.

Abstract

Animal feed is vulnerable to fungal infections, and the use of bio-preserving probiotics has received increasing attention. In contrast to Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria spp., fewer Bacillus spp. have been recognized as antifungal probiotics. Therefore, our objective was to screen antifungal strains and provide more Bacillus candidates to bridge this gap. Here, we screened 56 bacterial strains for cyclic lipopeptide genes and conducted an antifungal assay with Aspergillus niger as a representative fungus. We found that a Bacillus strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PM415, isolated from pigeon manure, exhibited the highest fungal inhibition activity as demonstrated by the confrontation assay and morphological observation under scanning electron microscope (SEM). Preliminary safety assessment and probiotic characterization revealed its non-pathogenic feature and stress tolerance capability. Whole genome sequencing of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PM415 revealed a genome size of 4.16 Mbp and 84 housekeeping genes thereof were used for phylogenetic analysis showing that it is most closely related to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens LFB112. The in silico analysis further supported its non-pathogenic feature at the genomic level and revealed potential biosynthetic gene clusters responsible for its antifungal property. RNA-seq analysis revealed genome-wide changes in transportation, amino acid metabolism, non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs) biosynthesis and glycan degradation during fungal antagonism. Our results suggest that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PM415 is a safe and effective probiotic strain that can prevent fungal growth in animal feeds.

Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Antifungal activity; Bio-preservation; Feed contamination; Probiotic.

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Abd El-Hack ME, Samak DH, Noreldin AE et al (2018) Probiotics and plant-derived compounds as eco-friendly agents to inhibit microbial toxins in poultry feed: a comprehensive review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:31971–31986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3197-2 - DOI
    1. Al KF, Daisley BA, Chanyi RM et al (2020) Oxalate-degrading Bacillus subtilis mitigates urolithiasis in a Drosophila melanogaster model. mSphere 5:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00498-20 - DOI
    1. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N (2019) AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 47:W276–W282. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz282 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Anee IJ, Alam S, Begum RA et al (2021) The role of probiotics on animal health and nutrition. J Basic Appl Zool 82. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41936-021-00250-x
    1. Arnison PG, Bibb MJ, Bierbaum G et al (2013) Ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptide natural products: overview and recommendations for a universal nomenclature. Nat Prod Rep 30:108–160 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources