Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach - PubMed
- ️Mon Jan 01 2024
Citations in Wikipedia for understanding research reach
Denise Smith et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2024.
Abstract
Objective: Wikipedia is the most frequently accessed online health information resource and is well positioned as a valuable tool for public health communication and knowledge translation. The authors aimed to explore their institution's health and medical research reach by analyzing its presence in Wikipedia articles.
Methods: In October 2022, a comprehensive database search was constructed in PubMed to retrieve clinical evidence syntheses published by at least one author affiliated with McMaster University from 2017 to 2022, inclusive. Altmetric Explorer was queried using PubMed Identifiers and article titles to access metadata and Wikipedia citation data. 3,582 health evidence syntheses from at least one McMaster University affiliated author were analyzed.
Results: Six percent (n=219) of health evidence syntheses from the authors' institution were cited 568 times in 524 unique Wikipedia articles across 28 different language editions. 45% of citations appeared in English Wikipedia, suggesting a broad global reach for the institutions' research outputs. When adjusted for open access publications, 8% of McMaster University's health evidence syntheses appear in Wikipedia.
Conclusion: Altmetric Explorer is a valuable tool for exploring the reach of an institution's research outputs. Isolating Altmetric data to focus on Wikipedia citations has value for any institution wishing to gain more insight into the global, community-level reach of its contributions to the latest health and medical evidence.
Keywords: Citations; Wikipedia; research reach.
Copyright © 2024 Denise Smith, Jennifer McKinnell, Jack Young.
Similar articles
-
Grover S, Elwood AD, Patel JM, Ananth CV, Brandt JS. Grover S, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):300.e1-300.e44. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 11. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35288087 Free PMC article.
-
Bould MD, Hladkowicz ES, Pigford AA, Ufholz LA, Postonogova T, Shin E, Boet S. Bould MD, et al. BMJ. 2014 Mar 6;348:g1585. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1585. BMJ. 2014. PMID: 24603564 Free PMC article.
-
The Most Influential Medical Journals According to Wikipedia: Quantitative Analysis.
Jemielniak D, Masukume G, Wilamowski M. Jemielniak D, et al. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 18;21(1):e11429. doi: 10.2196/11429. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30664451 Free PMC article.
-
Hsu YH, Ho YS. Hsu YH, et al. Methods Inf Med. 2014;53(6):446-58. doi: 10.3414/ME14-01-0022. Epub 2014 Oct 10. Methods Inf Med. 2014. PMID: 25301516 Review.
-
Zareivenovel M, Nemati-Anaraki L, Ouchi A, Nourizadeh M, Aghashahi M. Zareivenovel M, et al. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Feb 11;23(1):29-51. doi: 10.18502/ijaai.v23i1.14952. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38485908 Review.
References
-
- Committed to Creating a Brighter World – Brighter World [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 22]. Available from: https://brighterworld.mcmaster.ca/about/.
-
- About Us | Health Sciences Library [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 22]. Available from: https://hsl.mcmaster.ca/about-us.
-
- Priem J, Taraborelli D, Groth P, et al. altmetrics: a manifesto. Copyr Fair Use Sch Commun Etc [Internet]. 2011; Available from: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/185.
-
- Bornmann L. Validity of altmetrics data for measuring societal impact: A study using data from Altmetric and F1000Prime. J Informetr. 2014;8:935–950.
-
- Bornmann L. Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetrics. J Informetr. 2014;8:895–903.