Pilot trial of a new self-directed psychological intervention for infertility-related distress - PubMed
- ️Mon Jan 01 2024
Pilot trial of a new self-directed psychological intervention for infertility-related distress
Megan M L Poulter et al. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2024.
Abstract
Background: Now affecting one in six couples in Canada, infertility is defined as a lack of conception after 12 or more months of regular, unprotected heterosexual intercourse. Infertility is associated with immense psychological burden, particularly for individuals assigned female at birth. Yet existing psychological interventions are not specialized to this population and have been shown to be only marginally effective at relieving distress related to infertility. Thus, a new online self-directed psychological intervention was co-created with a panel of women experiencing infertility, and ultimately consisted of six 10-min video modules addressing the cognitive, emotional, and interpersonal aspects of infertility-related distress.
Methods: In the current study, 21 women experiencing reduced quality of life related to infertility were recruited to participate in a one-arm pre-post pilot testing the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of the program. Participant adherence and retention were monitored, and participants rated the credibility of the program and the helpfulness of each module as well as provided feedback on the content and format of the program. Pre-to-post changes in fertility quality of life, anxious symptoms, depressive symptoms, and relationship satisfaction were examined.
Results: The program modules were highly rated by participants, with average helpfulness ratings ranging from 7.5 to 8.2/10. Two participants became pregnant and therefore stopped prematurely, 79% of the remaining participants completed all six modules, and participants reported completing 52.8 (SD = 82.0) min of homework per week. Participants perceived the intervention as highly credible and generally approved of the format, length, and speed; however, 68% of participants had recommendations for additional content to be included in the intervention. While relationship satisfaction did not change significantly over time, large pre-to-post improvements in fertility quality of life, depression, and anxiety were observed (p < .001; Cohen's ds = 0.9-1.3).
Conclusions: This self-directed intervention was well received and has the potential to be highly effective in reducing infertility-related distress, informing future development and optimization.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05103982.
Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Distress; Fertility; Infertility; Pilot; Psychological intervention; Quality of life; Relationship satisfaction; Self-help.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f4f2/4f4f2bbbcf4d4fc6a079925233a8bd0caf7ed1e1" alt="Fig. 1"
Timeline of assessment. Note: FertiQoL = Fertility Quality of Life Tool; GAD-7 = Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale; PHQ-9 = Patient Health Questionnaire-9 Scale; RDAS = Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale; CEQ = Credibility/Expectancy Questionnaire
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7f7f/a7f7f99f125a016a3a3952cfbd6b8bf3a962c11b" alt="Fig. 2"
Mean (SE) scores on the FertiQoL throughout the intervention. Note: N = 15–21. *p < .05, compared to baseline. ****p < .0001, compared to baseline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8ed0/a8ed0ec1a540c34985283ac787bdbf85ab6c64cc" alt="Fig. 3"
Mean (SE) GAD-7 scores throughout the intervention. Note: N = 15–21. *p < .05, compared to baseline. **p < .01, compared to baseline. ***p < .001, compared to baseline. ****p < .0001, compared to baseline
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad43f/ad43f3340e572c8fb0034ac8539d0bab9fc867ec" alt="Fig. 4"
Mean (SE) PHQ-9 scores throughout the intervention. Note: N = 15–21. *p < .05, compared to baseline. **p < .01, compared to baseline. ***p < .001, compared to baseline. ****p < .0001, compared to baseline
Similar articles
-
Gordon JL, Poulter MML, Balsom AA, Campbell TS. Gordon JL, et al. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 18;13:e52662. doi: 10.2196/52662. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38236638 Free PMC article.
-
Balsom AA, Klest B, Sander B, Gordon JL. Balsom AA, et al. Reprod Health. 2024 Apr 4;21(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01766-5. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 38576027 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of expressive writing intervention for infertile couples: a randomized controlled trial.
Frederiksen Y, O'Toole MS, Mehlsen MY, Hauge B, Elbaek HO, Zachariae R, Ingerslev HJ. Frederiksen Y, et al. Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb;32(2):391-402. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew320. Epub 2016 Dec 21. Hum Reprod. 2017. PMID: 28007790 Clinical Trial.
-
Online support groups for women with breast cancer.
McCaughan E, Parahoo K, Hueter I, Northouse L, Bradbury I. McCaughan E, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 10;3(3):CD011652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011652.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28278559 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Specialist breast care nurses for support of women with breast cancer.
Brown T, Cruickshank S, Noblet M. Brown T, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 3;2(2):CD005634. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005634.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34559420 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Gordon JL, Poulter MML, Balsom AA, Campbell TS. Gordon JL, et al. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jan 18;13:e52662. doi: 10.2196/52662. JMIR Res Protoc. 2024. PMID: 38236638 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lindsay TJ, Vitrikas KR. Evaluation and treatment of infertility. Am Fam Physician. 2015;91(5):308–14. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources