pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A single session of coordinative motor training does not improve spatial ability performances in healthy children - PubMed

  • ️Mon Jan 01 2024

A single session of coordinative motor training does not improve spatial ability performances in healthy children

Christina Morawietz et al. Front Sports Act Living. 2024.

Abstract

Background: In recent years, studies have found small-to-medium positive effects of physical activity on academic achievement. Already acute bouts of exercise appear to improve certain cognitive functions. Spatial abilities are one aspect of cognition that is encountered frequently in daily life and that is closely related to success in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM)-subjects. However, little is known about the effects of an acute exercise session on spatial abilities. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of a single session of coordinative motor training (CMT) on spatial ability performances in healthy children.

Methods: Forty-nine children were assigned to either a single session of CMT (i.e., obstacle course with motor coordinative and spatial elements) (n = 25, 12 females, mean age: 10.7 ± 0.6 years) or a resting control group (n = 24, 12 females, mean age ± SD: 11.4 ± 0.5 years). Spatial abilities were evaluated in both groups using the Paper Folding Test (PFT), Mental Rotation Test (MRT), Water Level Task (WLT), Corsi Block Test (CBT), and Numbered Cones Run (NCR).

Results: A statistical main effect for Test was observed for the majority of outcomes (i.e., all but the MRT). Test × Group interactions did not reach the level of significance.

Conclusion: The results indicate that a single session of CMT does not improve spatial ability performances of healthy children. Future research should evaluate whether repeated longer-term interventions might be more suitable to generate significant improvements in spatial abilities.

Keywords: acute effects; movement coordination; treatment; visual-spatial abilities; youth.

© 2024 Morawietz, Wissmann, Kuehne and Muehlbauer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic description of the study design.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Schematic depiction of the spatial ability measures.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Schematic depiction of the intervention.

Similar articles

References

    1. Penedo FJ, Dahn JR. Exercise and well-being: a review of mental and physical health benefits associated with physical activity. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2005) 18(2):189–93. 10.1097/00001504-200503000-00013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Best JR. Effects of physical activity on children’s executive function: contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise. Dev Rev. (2010) 30(4):331–51. 10.1016/j.dr.2010.08.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organisation. Global Status Report on Physical Activity 2022. Geneva: World Health Organization; (2022).
    1. Donnelly JE, Hillman CH, Castelli D, Etnier JL, Lee S, Tomporowski P, et al. Physical activity, fitness, cognitive function, and academic achievement in children: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. (2016) 48(6):1197–222. 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000901 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bidzan-Bluma I, Lipowska M. Physical activity and cognitive functioning of children: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2018) 15:800. 10.3390/ijerph15040800 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Grants and funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the University of Duisburg-Essen. The funding body is independent of the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Project DEAL.

LinkOut - more resources