What causes the face inversion effect? - PubMed

What causes the face inversion effect?

M J Farah et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Jun.

Abstract

What is it about the way faces are represented by the visual system that makes them so much harder to recognize when inverted? The authors tested the hypothesis that the "face inversion" effect results from the use of holistic shape representations. This suggests that the susceptibility of nonface patterns to inversion should be a function of their degree of part decomposition. In Experiment 1 this was tested and confirmed with dot patterns in which the degree of part decomposition was manipulated by grouping and segregation on the basis of dot color. The hypothesis also predicted that the face inversion effect can be eliminated with face stimuli if participants are induced to recognize the faces in terms of their component parts. In Experiment 2 this was tested and confirmed with whole, intact faces, in which the degree of part decomposition was manipulated by allowing participants to study them, initially, in either whole, intact versions or versions with parts presented separately.

Similar articles

• Face-specific configural processing of relational information.

  Leder H, Carbon CC. Leder H, et al. Br J Psychol. 2006 Feb;97(Pt 1):19-29. doi: 10.1348/000712605X54794. Br J Psychol. 2006. PMID: 16464285

• Parts and wholes in face recognition.

  Tanaka JW, Farah MJ. Tanaka JW, et al. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):225-45. doi: 10.1080/14640749308401045. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993. PMID: 8316637

• Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies.

  Goffaux V, Rossion B. Goffaux V, et al. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):1023-39. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.1023. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006. PMID: 16846295

• Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition.

  Valentine T. Valentine T. Br J Psychol. 1988 Nov;79 ( Pt 4):471-91. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02747.x. Br J Psychol. 1988. PMID: 3061544 Review.

• Developmental origins of the face inversion effect.

  Cashon CH, Holt NA. Cashon CH, et al. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2015;48:117-50. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2014.11.008. Epub 2015 Jan 22. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2015. PMID: 25735943 Review.

Cited by

• Brain activation during upright and inverted encoding of own- and other-age faces: ERP evidence for an own-age bias.

  Melinder A, Gredebäck G, Westerlund A, Nelson CA. Melinder A, et al. Dev Sci. 2010 Jul;13(4):588-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00910.x. Dev Sci. 2010. PMID: 20590723 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.

• Global and high-level effects in crowding cannot be predicted by either high-dimensional pooling or target cueing.

  Bornet A, Choung OH, Doerig A, Whitney D, Herzog MH, Manassi M. Bornet A, et al. J Vis. 2021 Nov 1;21(12):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.21.12.10. J Vis. 2021. PMID: 34812839 Free PMC article.

• Neural Sensitivity to Mutual Information in Intermediate-Complexity Face Features Changes during Childhood.

  Balas B, Harel A, Auen A, Saville A. Balas B, et al. Brain Sci. 2019 Jun 28;9(7):154. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9070154. Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 31261725 Free PMC article.

• Horizontal information drives the behavioral signatures of face processing.

  Goffaux V, Dakin SC. Goffaux V, et al. Front Psychol. 2010 Sep 28;1:143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00143. eCollection 2010. Front Psychol. 2010. PMID: 21833212 Free PMC article.

• The perception of a familiar face is no more than the sum of its parts.

  Gold JM, Barker JD, Barr S, Bittner JL, Bratch A, Bromfield WD, Goode RA, Jones M, Lee D, Srinath A. Gold JM, et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Dec;21(6):1465-72. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0632-3. Psychon Bull Rev. 2014. PMID: 24777442 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • American Psychological Association
  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.