Speaker race identification from acoustic cues in the vocal signal - PubMed
Speaker race identification from acoustic cues in the vocal signal
J H Walton et al. J Speech Hear Res. 1994 Aug.
Abstract
One-second acoustic samples were extracted from the mid-portion of sustained /a/ vowels produced by 50 black and 50 white adult males. Each vowel sample from a black subject was randomly paired with a sample from a white subject. From the tape-recorded samples alone, both expert and naive listeners could determine the race of the speaker with 60% accuracy. The accuracy of race identification was independent of the listener's own race, sex, or listening experience. An acoustic analysis of the samples revealed that, although within ranges reported by previous studies of normal voices, the black speakers had greater frequency perturbation, significantly greater amplitude perturbation, and a significantly lower harmonics-to-noise ratio than did the white speakers. The listeners were most successful in distinguishing voice pairs when the differences in vocal perturbation and additive noise were greatest and were least successful when such differences were minimal or absent. Because there were no significant differences in the mean fundamental frequency or formant structure of the voice samples, it is likely that the listeners relied on differences in spectral noise to discriminate the black and white speakers.
Similar articles
-
Aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of the adult African American voice.
Sapienza CM. Sapienza CM. J Voice. 1997 Dec;11(4):410-6. doi: 10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80036-7. J Voice. 1997. PMID: 9422274
-
Acoustic Voice Analysis of Young Turkish Speakers.
Demirhan E, Unsal EM, Yilmaz C, Ertan E. Demirhan E, et al. J Voice. 2016 May;30(3):378.e21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 Jul 26. J Voice. 2016. PMID: 26223964
-
Jannetts S, Lowit A. Jannetts S, et al. J Voice. 2014 Nov;28(6):673-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.01.013. Epub 2014 May 16. J Voice. 2014. PMID: 24836365
-
Perception of vowels and prosody by cochlear implant recipients in noise.
Van Zyl M, Hanekom JJ. Van Zyl M, et al. J Commun Disord. 2013 Sep-Dec;46(5-6):449-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 21. J Commun Disord. 2013. PMID: 24157128
-
Vocal Effects in Military Students Submitted to an Intense Recruit Training: A Pilot Study.
Nascimento CL, Constantini AC, Mourão LF. Nascimento CL, et al. J Voice. 2016 Jan;30(1):61-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.005. Epub 2015 May 29. J Voice. 2016. PMID: 26028370 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of motivation and cultural dialects in the in-group advantage for emotional vocalizations.
Sauter DA. Sauter DA. Front Psychol. 2013 Oct 30;4:814. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00814. eCollection 2013. Front Psychol. 2013. PMID: 24198807 Free PMC article.
-
Tracy EC, Bainter SA, Satariano NP. Tracy EC, et al. J Phon. 2015 Sep;52:13-25. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.04.001. J Phon. 2015. PMID: 26207075 Free PMC article.
-
Zhu S, Chong S, Chen Y, Wang T, Ng ML. Zhu S, et al. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(6):421-430. doi: 10.1159/000525649. Epub 2022 Jun 28. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022. PMID: 35764052 Free PMC article.
-
Romann AJ, Beber BC, Cielo CA, Rieder CRM. Romann AJ, et al. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Apr;23(2):203-208. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675392. Epub 2019 Mar 1. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. PMID: 30956706 Free PMC article.
-
Ritter M, Sauter DA. Ritter M, et al. Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 16;8:2006. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02006. eCollection 2017. Front Psychol. 2017. PMID: 29201012 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical