Recombination-dependent deletion formation in mammalian cells deficient in the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1 - PubMed
- ️Wed Jan 01 1997
Recombination-dependent deletion formation in mammalian cells deficient in the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1
R G Sargent et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997.
Abstract
Nucleotide excision repair proteins have been implicated in genetic recombination by experiments in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Drosophila melanogaster, but their role, if any, in mammalian cells is undefined. To investigate the role of the nucleotide excision repair gene ERCC1, the hamster homologue to the S. cerevisiae RADIO gene, we disabled the gene by targeted knockout. Partial tandem duplications of the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) gene then were constructed at the endogenous APRT locus in ERCC1- and ERCC1+ cells. To detect the full spectrum of gene-altering events, we used a loss-of-function assay in which the parental APRT+ tandem duplication could give rise to APRT- cells by homologous recombination, gene rearrangement, or point mutation. Measurement of rates and analysis of individual APRT- products indicated that gene rearrangements (principally deletions) were increased at least 50-fold, whereas homologous recombination was affected little. The formation of deletions is not caused by a general effect of the ERCC1 deficiency on gene stability, because ERCC1- cell lines with a single wild-type copy of the APRT gene yielded no increase in deletions. Thus, deletion formation is dependent on the tandem duplication, and presumably the process of homologous recombination. Recombination-dependent deletion formation in ERCC1- cells is supported by a significant decrease in a particular class of crossover products that are thought to arise by repair of a heteroduplex intermediate in recombination. We suggest that the ERCC1 gene product in mammalian cells is involved in the processing of heteroduplex intermediates in recombination and that the misprocessed intermediates in ERCC1- cells are repaired by illegitimate recombination.
Figures

Gene structures of the APRT locus and a possible recombination intermediate recognized by NER. (A) Tandemly duplicated APRT recombination substrate. In this and other figures, the heavy lines represent chromosomal sequences and the thin line represents plasmid backbone. The APRT gene is represented by an open box, the GPT gene by a solid box, and the TK gene by a crosshatched box. The FRT sequences located in intron 2 are represented by the inverted triangle above both APRT gene copies. The exon 2 mutation that destroys the EcoRV site is denoted by a heavy vertical line at the 5′ end of the upstream APRT copy; at other positions (see Table 2) the heavy line represents undefined APRT point mutations. The sizes of the three recombination intervals defined by the TK gene, GPT gene, and exon-2 mutation are shown above the APRT map. (B) Single copy APRT gene in cell lines used for measuring spontaneous rates of point mutations, deletions, and gene rearrangements.

Molecular structure of APRT− gene deletions and rearrangements recovered from ERCC1− cells. APRT exons are indicated as open boxes. Numbering in kilobase pairs (kb) for these maps is relative to the BamHI site 5′ of the downstream APRT copy (map position 0). The PCR primers used to map the extent of deletions and rearrangements are shown below the APRT maps. The open areas between the brackets for each gene structure represent regions that did not yield PCR products; thus the bracketed regions indicate the interval in which deletion and rearrangement junctions map. The sizes of the deletions as estimated from Southern analysis are indicated at the right. Deletions whose endpoints were determined precisely by sequencing across PCR products are indicated without brackets. A straight line under GPT for both tandem duplication and crossover recombinant structures indicates GPT is present (by PCR); an indentation under the GPT gene indicates it is absent, which may indicate conversion to the wild-type APRT sequence. Rearrangement 1 is missing the GPT gene, perhaps because of gene conversion, but it also has other rearrangements that are apparent from Southern analysis.

A recombination heteroduplex intermediate that could be a substrate for the Ercc1/XpF endonuclease. The heteroduplex DNA was created by annealing the top DNA strand from the upstream APRT gene to the bottom strand from the downstream APRT gene so that the heteroduplex spans the GPT gene (see Fig. 1). This heteroduplex creates an ≈800-bp deletion loop similar to in vitro substrates processed by purified NER proteins, whose putative sites of action are indicated.
Similar articles
-
Role of ERCC1 in removal of long non-homologous tails during targeted homologous recombination.
Adair GM, Rolig RL, Moore-Faver D, Zabelshansky M, Wilson JH, Nairn RS. Adair GM, et al. EMBO J. 2000 Oct 16;19(20):5552-61. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.20.5552. EMBO J. 2000. PMID: 11032822 Free PMC article.
-
Sargent RG, Meservy JL, Perkins BD, Kilburn AE, Intody Z, Adair GM, Nairn RS, Wilson JH. Sargent RG, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Oct 1;28(19):3771-8. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.19.3771. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000. PMID: 11000269 Free PMC article.
-
Use of gene targeting to study recombination in mammalian cell DNA repair mutants.
Nairn RS, Adair GM. Nairn RS, et al. Methods Mol Biol. 2006;314:133-54. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-973-7:133. Methods Mol Biol. 2006. PMID: 16673880
-
The ERCC1 and ERCC4 (XPF) genes and gene products.
Manandhar M, Boulware KS, Wood RD. Manandhar M, et al. Gene. 2015 Sep 15;569(2):153-61. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jun 12. Gene. 2015. PMID: 26074087 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interstrand crosslink repair: can XPF-ERCC1 be let off the hook?
Bergstralh DT, Sekelsky J. Bergstralh DT, et al. Trends Genet. 2008 Feb;24(2):70-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.11.003. Epub 2008 Jan 14. Trends Genet. 2008. PMID: 18192062 Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular mechanisms of resistance and toxicity associated with platinating agents.
Rabik CA, Dolan ME. Rabik CA, et al. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007 Feb;33(1):9-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Nov 3. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007. PMID: 17084534 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Uil TG, Haisma HJ, Rots MG. Uil TG, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Nov 1;31(21):6064-78. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg815. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003. PMID: 14576293 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Guyon-Debast A, Rossetti P, Charlot F, Epert A, Neuhaus JM, Schaefer DG, Nogué F. Guyon-Debast A, et al. Front Plant Sci. 2019 May 9;10:588. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00588. eCollection 2019. Front Plant Sci. 2019. PMID: 31143199 Free PMC article.
-
XPF interacts with TOP2B for R-loop processing and DNA looping on actively transcribed genes.
Chatzinikolaou G, Stratigi K, Siametis A, Goulielmaki E, Akalestou-Clocher A, Tsamardinos I, Topalis P, Austin C, Bouwman BAM, Crosetto N, Altmüller J, Garinis GA. Chatzinikolaou G, et al. Sci Adv. 2023 Nov 10;9(45):eadi2095. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi2095. Epub 2023 Nov 8. Sci Adv. 2023. PMID: 37939182 Free PMC article.
-
Role of ERCC1 in removal of long non-homologous tails during targeted homologous recombination.
Adair GM, Rolig RL, Moore-Faver D, Zabelshansky M, Wilson JH, Nairn RS. Adair GM, et al. EMBO J. 2000 Oct 16;19(20):5552-61. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.20.5552. EMBO J. 2000. PMID: 11032822 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Friedberg E C, Walker G C, Seide W. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. Washington D.C.: Am. Soc. Microbiol.; 1995.
-
- Chu G, Mayne L. Trends Genet. 1996;2:187–192. - PubMed
-
- Jachymczyk W J, von Borstol R C, Mowat M R A, Hastings P J. Mol Gen Genet. 1981;182:196–205. - PubMed
-
- Bessho T, Sancar A, Thompson L H, Thelan M P. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:3833–3837. - PubMed
-
- Park C H, Bessho T, Matsunaga T, Sancar A. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:22657–22660. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources