Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? - PubMed
. 1998 Mar-Apr;30(2):79-88.
Affiliations
- PMID: 9561873
Free article
Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter?
K Kost et al. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Mar-Apr.
Free article
Abstract
Context: Women's behavior during pregnancy, which can affect the health of their infant, may be influenced by their attitude toward the pregnancy.
Methods: Multivariate analyses of data from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey and the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth were conducted to investigate whether women with unplanned births differ from other women in their pregnancy behavior, independent of their social and demographic characteristics.
Results: Women with intended conceptions are more likely than similar women with unintended pregnancies to recognize early signs of pregnancy and to seek out early prenatal care, and somewhat more likely to quit smoking, but they are not more likely than women with comparable social and demographic characteristics to adhere to a recommended schedule of prenatal visits once they begin care, to reduce alcohol intake, or to follow their clinician's advice about taking vitamins and gaining weight. Social and demographic differences in these behaviors are largely unaffected by planning status, indicating that these differences are independently related to pregnancy behaviors.
Conclusions: Both the intendedness of a pregnancy and the mother's social and demographic characteristics are important predictors of pregnancy-related behavior.
PIP: The hypothesis that women's behaviors during pregnancy that have the potential to influence their baby's health are influenced by their attitudes toward the pregnancy was examined through use of data from two US surveys: the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey (n = 9122 births) and the 1988 National Survey of Family Growth (n = 2586 births). Specifically, it was explored whether women with unintended (mistimed or unwanted) pregnancies make less use of prenatal care services and conform less closely to recommended practices such as those related to smoking and weight gain than women with planned pregnancies, independent of their social and demographic characteristics. Multivariate analysis indicated women with planned pregnancies were 12 percentage points more likely than women with unintended births to recognize their pregnancy in the first 6 weeks, 16 percentage points more likely to have initiated prenatal care in the first 8 weeks, and 8 percentage points more likely to have adhered to medical advice to quit smoking. Once the effects of social and demographic factors were controlled, these differences were reduced by 49%, 46%, and 32%, respectively. Contrary to expectations, once prenatal care was initiated, women with an unintended pregnancy were as likely to meet the recommended number of visits, reduce alcohol consumption, take vitamins, and gain weight per advice as women with a planned pregnancy. These results indicate a need to pay attention to social and demographic factors that contribute to late recognition of pregnancy, delayed entry into prenatal care, and continued smoking during pregnancy as well as the wantedness of the pregnancy in the design of maternal-child health programs.
Similar articles
-
The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care.
Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. Kost K, et al. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Sep-Oct;30(5):223-30. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998. PMID: 9782045
-
Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women's first and later pregnancies.
Speizer IS, Santelli JS, Afable-Munsuz A, Kendall C. Speizer IS, et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004 Sep-Oct;36(5):198-205. doi: 10.1363/psrh.36.198.04. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2004. PMID: 15519962
-
Determinants of couple agreement in U.S. fertility decisions.
Williams LB. Williams LB. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994 Jul-Aug;26(4):169-73. Fam Plann Perspect. 1994. PMID: 7957819
-
Can home visitation improve the health of women and children at environmental risk?
Olds DL, Kitzman H. Olds DL, et al. Pediatrics. 1990 Jul;86(1):108-16. Pediatrics. 1990. PMID: 2193300 Review.
Cited by
-
Sikder SS, Labrique AB, Craig IM, Wakil MA, Shamim AA, Ali H, Mehra S, Wu L, Shaikh S, West KP Jr, Christian P. Sikder SS, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 18;15:166. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0832-1. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 25985774 Free PMC article.
-
Riskier than we thought: revised estimates of noncontracepting women risking unintended pregnancy.
Gaydos L, Hogue CJ, Kramer MR. Gaydos L, et al. Public Health Rep. 2006 Mar-Apr;121(2):155-9. doi: 10.1177/003335490612100209. Public Health Rep. 2006. PMID: 16528948 Free PMC article.
-
On the validity of retrospective assessments of pregnancy intention.
Joyce T, Kaestner R, Korenman S. Joyce T, et al. Demography. 2002 Feb;39(1):199-213. doi: 10.1353/dem.2002.0006. Demography. 2002. PMID: 11852837
-
Children's experiences after the unintended birth of a sibling.
Barber JS, East PL. Barber JS, et al. Demography. 2011 Feb;48(1):101-25. doi: 10.1007/s13524-010-0011-2. Demography. 2011. PMID: 21336690 Free PMC article.
-
Galvin AM, Lewis MA, Walters ST, Thompson EL. Galvin AM, et al. Public Health Rep. 2024 Jul-Aug;139(4):458-466. doi: 10.1177/00333549231204658. Epub 2023 Nov 4. Public Health Rep. 2024. PMID: 37924255 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical