The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? - PubMed

Affiliations

• PMID: 9892455
• DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.1.77

Meta-Analysis

The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm?

F A Lederle et al. JAMA. 1999.

Abstract

In the physical examination of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), the only maneuver of demonstrated value is abdominal palpation to detect abnormal widening of the aortic pulsation. Palpation of AAA appears to be safe and has not been reported to precipitate rupture. The best evidence on the accuracy of abdominal palpation comes from 15 studies of patients not previously known to have AAA who were screened with both abdominal palpation and ultrasound. When results from these studies are pooled, the sensitivity of abdominal palpation increases significantly with AAA diameter (P<.001), ranging from 29% for AAAs of 3.0 to 3.9 cm to 50% for AAAs of 4.0 to 4.9 cm and 76% for AAAs of 5.0 cm or greater. Positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a cutoff point for AAAs of 3.0 cm or greater are 12.0 (95% CI, 7.4-19.5) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.65-0.81), respectively, and for AAAs of 4.0 cm or greater are 15.6 (95% CI, 8.6-28.5) and 0.51 (95% CI, 0.38-0.67). The positive predictive value of palpation for AAA of 3.0 cm or greater in these studies was 43%. Limited data suggest that abdominal obesity decreases the sensitivity of palpation. Abdominal palpation specifically directed at measuring aortic width has moderate sensitivity for detecting an AAA that would be large enough to be referred for surgery but cannot be relied on to exclude AAA, especially if rupture is a possibility.

Comment in

• Diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm.

  Callis JT. Callis JT. JAMA. 1999 Jun 2;281(21):1989. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.21.1989-b. JAMA. 1999. PMID: 10359385 No abstract available.

• Evidence-based emergency medicine/rational clinical examination abstract. Abdominal palpation for the diagnosis of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

  Carpenter CR. Carpenter CR. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 May;45(5):556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.02.008. Ann Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 15861533 No abstract available.

Similar articles

• The accuracy of physical examination to detect abdominal aortic aneurysm.

  Fink HA, Lederle FA, Roth CS, Bowles CA, Nelson DB, Haas MA. Fink HA, et al. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 27;160(6):833-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.6.833. Arch Intern Med. 2000. PMID: 10737283

• Positive predictive value of clinical suspicion of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Implications for efficient use of abdominal ultrasonography.

  Beede SD, Ballard DJ, James EM, Ilstrup DM, Hallet JW Jr. Beede SD, et al. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Mar;150(3):549-51. Arch Intern Med. 1990. PMID: 2106847

• Selective screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms with physical examination and ultrasound.

  Lederle FA, Walker JM, Reinke DB. Lederle FA, et al. Arch Intern Med. 1988 Aug;148(8):1753-6. Arch Intern Med. 1988. PMID: 3041938

• Accuracy of abdominal examination in the diagnosis of non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

  Lynch RM. Lynch RM. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004 Apr;12(2):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2003.09.005. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2004. PMID: 15041011 Review.

• Systematic review: emergency department bedside ultrasonography for diagnosing suspected abdominal aortic aneurysm.

  Rubano E, Mehta N, Caputo W, Paladino L, Sinert R. Rubano E, et al. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):128-38. doi: 10.1111/acem.12080. Acad Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23406071 Review.

Cited by

• [Aneurysms of the abdominal aorta in a primary care clinic].

  Jiménez Mena C, Varela González A. Jiménez Mena C, et al. Aten Primaria. 2001 Apr 15;27(6):443-4. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78832-4. Aten Primaria. 2001. PMID: 11334587 Free PMC article. Spanish. No abstract available.

• Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence.

  Leeflang MM, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Leeflang MM, et al. CMAJ. 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.121286. Epub 2013 Jun 24. CMAJ. 2013. PMID: 23798453 Free PMC article. Review.

• Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.

  Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Di Nisio M, Smidt N, van Rijn JC, Bossuyt PM. Rutjes AW, et al. CMAJ. 2006 Feb 14;174(4):469-76. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050090. CMAJ. 2006. PMID: 16477057 Free PMC article.

• Diagnosing abdominal aortic aneurysm. How good is the physical examination?

  Pysklywec M, Evans MF. Pysklywec M, et al. Can Fam Physician. 1999 Sep;45:2069-70. Can Fam Physician. 1999. PMID: 10509219 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

• An atypical presentation of aortic rupture: intuition and investigation can avoid disaster.

  Shah TT, Herbert P, Beresford T. Shah TT, et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011 Oct;93(7):e125-8. doi: 10.1308/147870811X602131. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2011. PMID: 22004619 Free PMC article.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

• Full Text Sources

  • Ovid Technologies, Inc.
  • Silverchair Information Systems