Christian Plantin | Université Lyon - Academia.edu

Publication Information: Book Title: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historic... more Publication Information: Book Title: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Contributors: Frans H. Van Eemeren - author, Rob Grootendorst - author, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - author, J. Anthony ...

International audienceContesting the opposition between (scientific) ‘demonstration’ and (rhetori... more International audienceContesting the opposition between (scientific) ‘demonstration’ and (rhetorical) ‘argumentation,’ the author claims that argumentation is a full-blown, legitimate way of knowledge acquisition and knowledge-based decision making. The form and substance of argumentative dialogue is presented as a powerful intellectual tool that can build a bridge between the ‘two academic cultures.

[Colloque tenu à la Sorbonne en septembre 1998

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

This writing originates from the organization of a conference addressed to the VI International C... more This writing originates from the organization of a conference addressed to the VI International Congress on science teachers' education, held in Bogota, from 8 to 10 October 2014. Dr. Plantin was one of the invited speakers, who presents in this article relevant aspects related to the argumentation, its origins from rhetoric, the role of language in argumentation, the argumentation as a word and as a concept; its perspectives within different languages, and the uses of argumentation based on Toulmin model of argument, which reminds us that arguments are generally expressed with qualifiers and rebuttals rather than asserted as absolutes. This paper presents alternative perspectives on the argumentation, such as the argumentative rhetoric, dialectics, the practice of the rebuttal and critical thinking, in relation to the dialectic and the classical logic, argumentation theory in language and scientific argumentation and implications for science education.

Éditions Kimé eBooks, 1993

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

L’article de Christian Plantin aborde un aspect particulier du discours argumentatif, lorsque l’a... more L’article de Christian Plantin aborde un aspect particulier du discours argumentatif, lorsque l’argumentation passe principalement par l’usage de certains mots, utilises comme emblemes ou signaux. Ici l’argumentation est liee a une certaine emotion, celle qui exprime ou suscite l’indignation. Les liens entre argumentation et emotion sont particulierement interessants a elucider, en ce qu’ils contreviennent a l’idee communement partagee de l’argumentation comme discours rationnel. C. Plantin montre dans cet article comment l’indignation est le produit d’une activite discursive. Il decrit le scenario de l’indignation a partir d’une collection d’exemples et pour finir, a partir de l’ouvrage de Stephane Hessel Indignezvous ! Bien que ce ne soit pas du tout son propos, l’analyse qu’il mene ici peut alimenter le travail sur le lexique tel qu’il peut etre mene dans les classes du secondaire. La redaction de Recherches

Republication de 2002c, Argumentation Studies and Discourse Analysis, Discourse studie

Éditions Kimé eBooks, 1990

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

Argumentation, Aug 24, 2022

He was professor emeritus at the Free University of Brussels. Meyer was a student, a collaborator... more He was professor emeritus at the Free University of Brussels. Meyer was a student, a collaborator and one of the heirs of Chaïm Perelman (1912-1884), who co-authored with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca The New rhetoric-A treatise on Argumentation. In 1986, Michel Meyer co-founded with Frans van Eemeren Rob Grootendorst and Christian Plantin our journal Argumentation. Michel Meyer had an encyclopaedic mind; his passionate interests extended to all fields of knowledge. For almost forty years, he was the director of the Revue Internationale de Philosophie. The variety, relevance and topicality of the topics dealt with in the four annual issues of the journal testify to his vision and influence. Meyer left behind a large body of work: more than thirty books. In 1977, he was awarded a doctorate in philosophy (Découverte et justification en science: Essai de déconstruction du néo-positivisme [Discovery and justification in science: a deconstruction of neo-positivism]). In De la problématologie (Mardaga, 1986) [Of problematology, Chicago Press, 1996) he developed an original vision on argumentation and philosophy, with a new view of rationality founded on questioning. Later Meyer applied his method to the most diverse issues in philosophy, rhetoric, and human sciences, literature, history and art. His Principia rhetorica (2008) addresses the general issue of "the negotiation of distance between individuals about a given issue", as a general theory of argumentation-contrasting it with Perelman's vision of rhetoric. The Principia moralia, which he published in 2013, investigates the status of morality in today's world by relying on the concept of interindividual distance to present a synthetic view of ethical theories. In Meyer's Principia politica-Histoire, économie, société, published in 2022, he questions the link between

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

Trad. N. I. Muñoz, prólogo de R. Marafoti. Buenos Aires, Biblos, "Ciencias del lenguaje&quot... more Trad. N. I. Muñoz, prólogo de R. Marafoti. Buenos Aires, Biblos, "Ciencias del lenguaje". [trad. de L'argumentation : Histoire, théories, perspectives; Paris, PUF, 2005

Publication Information: Book Title: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historic... more Publication Information: Book Title: Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Contributors: Frans H. Van Eemeren - author, Rob Grootendorst - author, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans - author, J. Anthony ...

International audienceContesting the opposition between (scientific) ‘demonstration’ and (rhetori... more International audienceContesting the opposition between (scientific) ‘demonstration’ and (rhetorical) ‘argumentation,’ the author claims that argumentation is a full-blown, legitimate way of knowledge acquisition and knowledge-based decision making. The form and substance of argumentative dialogue is presented as a powerful intellectual tool that can build a bridge between the ‘two academic cultures.

[Colloque tenu à la Sorbonne en septembre 1998

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

This writing originates from the organization of a conference addressed to the VI International C... more This writing originates from the organization of a conference addressed to the VI International Congress on science teachers' education, held in Bogota, from 8 to 10 October 2014. Dr. Plantin was one of the invited speakers, who presents in this article relevant aspects related to the argumentation, its origins from rhetoric, the role of language in argumentation, the argumentation as a word and as a concept; its perspectives within different languages, and the uses of argumentation based on Toulmin model of argument, which reminds us that arguments are generally expressed with qualifiers and rebuttals rather than asserted as absolutes. This paper presents alternative perspectives on the argumentation, such as the argumentative rhetoric, dialectics, the practice of the rebuttal and critical thinking, in relation to the dialectic and the classical logic, argumentation theory in language and scientific argumentation and implications for science education.

Éditions Kimé eBooks, 1993

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

L’article de Christian Plantin aborde un aspect particulier du discours argumentatif, lorsque l’a... more L’article de Christian Plantin aborde un aspect particulier du discours argumentatif, lorsque l’argumentation passe principalement par l’usage de certains mots, utilises comme emblemes ou signaux. Ici l’argumentation est liee a une certaine emotion, celle qui exprime ou suscite l’indignation. Les liens entre argumentation et emotion sont particulierement interessants a elucider, en ce qu’ils contreviennent a l’idee communement partagee de l’argumentation comme discours rationnel. C. Plantin montre dans cet article comment l’indignation est le produit d’une activite discursive. Il decrit le scenario de l’indignation a partir d’une collection d’exemples et pour finir, a partir de l’ouvrage de Stephane Hessel Indignezvous ! Bien que ce ne soit pas du tout son propos, l’analyse qu’il mene ici peut alimenter le travail sur le lexique tel qu’il peut etre mene dans les classes du secondaire. La redaction de Recherches

Republication de 2002c, Argumentation Studies and Discourse Analysis, Discourse studie

Éditions Kimé eBooks, 1990

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

Argumentation, Aug 24, 2022

He was professor emeritus at the Free University of Brussels. Meyer was a student, a collaborator... more He was professor emeritus at the Free University of Brussels. Meyer was a student, a collaborator and one of the heirs of Chaïm Perelman (1912-1884), who co-authored with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca The New rhetoric-A treatise on Argumentation. In 1986, Michel Meyer co-founded with Frans van Eemeren Rob Grootendorst and Christian Plantin our journal Argumentation. Michel Meyer had an encyclopaedic mind; his passionate interests extended to all fields of knowledge. For almost forty years, he was the director of the Revue Internationale de Philosophie. The variety, relevance and topicality of the topics dealt with in the four annual issues of the journal testify to his vision and influence. Meyer left behind a large body of work: more than thirty books. In 1977, he was awarded a doctorate in philosophy (Découverte et justification en science: Essai de déconstruction du néo-positivisme [Discovery and justification in science: a deconstruction of neo-positivism]). In De la problématologie (Mardaga, 1986) [Of problematology, Chicago Press, 1996) he developed an original vision on argumentation and philosophy, with a new view of rationality founded on questioning. Later Meyer applied his method to the most diverse issues in philosophy, rhetoric, and human sciences, literature, history and art. His Principia rhetorica (2008) addresses the general issue of "the negotiation of distance between individuals about a given issue", as a general theory of argumentation-contrasting it with Perelman's vision of rhetoric. The Principia moralia, which he published in 2013, investigates the status of morality in today's world by relying on the concept of interindividual distance to present a synthetic view of ethical theories. In Meyer's Principia politica-Histoire, économie, société, published in 2022, he questions the link between

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

Peter Lang eBooks, Jul 11, 2016

Trad. N. I. Muñoz, prólogo de R. Marafoti. Buenos Aires, Biblos, "Ciencias del lenguaje&quot... more Trad. N. I. Muñoz, prólogo de R. Marafoti. Buenos Aires, Biblos, "Ciencias del lenguaje". [trad. de L'argumentation : Histoire, théories, perspectives; Paris, PUF, 2005