web.archive.org

The problem with video conferencing

  • ️Jim Van Meggelen
  • ️Tue Apr 19 2005

weblogs.oreilly.com: Telephony

   Print.Print
Email.Email weblog link
Discuss.Discuss
Blog this.Blog this
Jim Van Meggelen

I've been thinking about video conferencing (and video phones, and all such similar devices).

We've been promised video phones pretty much since the invention of the television, but somehow they've never taken off. The argument is that the technology just isn't quite ready, but I don't believe it for a minute.

Here's what I think two of the biggest problems are:


Eye-to-eye contact


Have you ever spoken over the phone to someone who was in eyesight (in the same room, across the hall, sitting next to you on a park bench)?

Do you find it feels unnatural to actually look at each other?

It's not natural for us to make eye contact when we're on the phone, so even when we can make eye contact, we cannot.

With a videophone, however, we're expected to make eye contact. That's what it's for, right?

Unfortunately, the focal point of the screen is not the focal point of the camera, and it is therefore impossible to both look at the person you are talking to, and see them as well. You either look at the screen, or the camera. This makes for a very unnatural conversation, because if you are looking at my face on your screen, your camera will capture you looking down, not at me. If you look at your camera, then I will see you looking at me, but you will not be able to see my face, because your eyes will not be on your screen.

Either scenario makes for a totally unnatural conversation, which leaves eye-to-eye videophones interesting to play with, but useless to really communicate with.

Anonymity and privacy


On the telephone, I can have an important business conversation in my underwear (or worse). If I do this with video, I'm into a whole new business ;-)

So, my conclusions go something like this:


1) Videoconferencing will never really takeoff until a videophone can be built where the focal point of the screen and camera are the same. When I look you in the eye, you'd better see me looking you in the eye. Perhaps something like the TelePromptR used in the broadcasting industry would work, or a tiny pinhole camera in the middle of the screen.

2) On some level, video will never completely replace the phone. People value their communications, but also their privacy.

Jim Van Meggelen is President and CTO of Core Telecom Innovations, a Canadian-based provider of open-source telephony solutions.

Do you use video (such as a webcam) to communicate? In business? In the home? In your underwear?
You must be logged in to the O'Reilly Network to post a comment.

Post Comment

Full Threads Oldest First

Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.


Showing messages 1 through 4 of 4.

Return to weblogs.oreilly.com.

Weblog authors are solely responsible for the content and accuracy of their weblogs, including opinions they express, and O'Reilly Media, Inc., disclaims any and all liabililty for that content, its accuracy, and opinions it may contain.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.