Paul R. Thagard, Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience - PhilPapers
- ️Sun May 29 2011
Using astrology as a case study, this paper attempts to establish a criterion for demarcating science from pseudoscience. Numerous reasons for considering astrology to be a pseudoscience are evaluated and rejected; verifiability and falsifiability are briefly discussed. A theory is said to be pseudoscientific if and only if (1) it has been less progressive than alternative theories over a long period of time, and faces many unsolved problems, but (2) the community of practitioners makes little attempt to develop the theory towards solutions of the problems, shows no concern for attempts to evaluate the theory in relation to others, and is selective in considering confirmations and disconfirmations. This criterion has the interesting consequence that a theory can be scientific at one time but pseudoscientific at another.
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
No references found.
Added to PP index
2011-05-29
Total views
1,568
( #855 of 2,313,927
)
Recent downloads (6 months)
578
( #416 of 2,313,927
)
How can I increase my downloads?