Plebeian Tribunes and the Government of Early Rome
- ️https://ohio.academia.edu/FredDrogula
Related papers
1998
Giving thanks is a pleasure. This book had its origin in issues raised in my dissertation, "Sors et Provincia: Praetors and Quaestors in Republican Rome" (Duke University, 1987). Like the dissertation, it could not have been written without A.K. Michels, who gave patiently and kindly of her immense learning both when I formally studied Roman religion with her and subsequently as a mentor. Kent Rigsby first taught me to ask whether modem conceptual categories reflect ancient definitions and continues to insist that I say what I mean. Lawrence Richardson has demonstrated to me time and again the importance of appreciating the isolated, oftentimes arcane detail in its fuller context. All three have encouraged my interest in Roman governmental procedure and given generously of their time.
Power and Politics in Fifth Century BC Rome. The Censorship and Consular Tribunate in Context
ASCS 32 Selected Proceedings, edited by Anne Mackay, 2011
The issues addressed in this paper have been addressed numerous times before. The most recent in-depth studies were by Holloway and Richard, but subject was also investigated in the 1980s by scholars like Ridley and Drummond, in the 1970s by Pinsent, in a spurt of activity in the 1950s, and of course even earlier by scholars like De Sanctis, Mommsen, and others. 1 Indeed, the origin and nature of Rome's early magistracies have fascinated historians, both ancient and modern, since our first extant histories of the period, in large part because there is so little information about them. In particular, the purpose and original nature of the consular tribunes, those enigmatic figures who seem to have taken over the duties of the consuls (albeit on an irregular basis) during the period from 444 to 367 BC, is an issue which vexed even our earliest extant Roman historians (most notably Livy), who presented more than one possible reason for their creation and seem to have been more than a bit confused as to their power and purpose. 2 The reason for this uncertainty is easy to understand. While Rome's first historians, writing in the final two centuries of the Republic, could at least see later examples of most early magistracies (consuls, praetors, censors, etc.), by the late Republic the military tribunes with consular power had not existed for over 150 years, or at least not in a form which in anyway resembled their 5 th century BC incarnation. Consequently, our sources, and indeed many modern scholars, are hazy on even their basic role, power, and function.
The ancient sources mention speeches being delivered in the late Republic in con-tiones by both consuls-elect and tribunes of the plebs designate. It has usually been assumed that as magistrates-elect they did not have the right to summon a popular assembly. In this paper it is suggested that magistrates-designate – or at least some of them – had this privilege. This should be understood in the more general framework in which the designati played a political and institutional role during the late Republic.
The republic and its highest office: some introductory remarks on the Roman consulate
Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, 2011
The consulship of the Roman republic is notoriously under-researched. To be sure, the republican "constitution," and with it the consulate, have been addressed to a certain extent. Examples in English include Andrew Lintott's The Constitution of the Roman Republic and T. Corey Brennan's and John North's more recent syntheses. 1 In some sense, these studies provide a comprehensive summary of a long series of scholarly contributions on the republic's institutional apparatus, starting with Theodor Mommsen's contribution and explored further in the works of Ettore de Ruggiero, Francesco de Martino, Jochen Bleicken, Wolfgang Kunkel and Roland Wittmann. 2 This scholarship deals with the Roman "constitution" in general terms, and all of these essays focus, more or less, on the supreme magistracy in the republic. Furthermore, the consulship has been studied in research on Roman chronology and on the Roman nobility. 3 Republican prosopography is roughly based on the Fasti Consulares as a starting point. 4 In fact, without Broughton's monumental work it would be practically impossible to tackle any study on the republican period. 5 And, of course, the groundbreaking work of Adalberto Giovannini must be mentioned. Giovannini succeeded in proving the non-existence of the assumed lex Cornelia de provinciis ordinandis, prompted by Mommsen, and www.cambridge.org
Public Law and Republican Empire in Rome, 200 - 27 BCE
Edward Cavanagh, ed., Empire and Legal Thought: Ideas and Institutions from Antiquity to Modernity, 2020
The paper traces the emergent project of empire at Rome from the end of the Hannibalic War to the foundation of the Principate. It focuses on the role of law in this process, tracing the passage of Roman diplomacy from a period in which Rome sought to bind networks of parties in bilateral alliances to one in which Rome used grants of recognition to favored allies to extend the reach of its control over provincial landscapes.
2021
Monograph focused on the analysis of the conception, the political and institutional development and the administration of the Roman provinces, from their most remote origins to the Principality of Augustus, through nine contributions made by two specialists from republican Rome of national and national origin. international. From a detailed study of the sources, the participants address in their work different aspects of the Roman provincial administration, attending to issues such as the genesis of the republican provincial framework, the procedures for the assignment and extension of provincial commands, the role played by the heads of the provinces in diplomatic activity or the impact of the Principality of Augustus on the provincial structure. https://puz.unizar.es/2543-provinces-and-provincial-command-in-republican-rome-genesis-development-and-governance.html