THE PHONETICS OF NASAL-FRICATIVE SEQUENCES IN LATIN
- ️https://ucla.academia.edu/JessicaDeLisi
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Abstract
Inscriptional material and descriptions by grammarians from the classical period indicate that vowels were regularly lengthened before-ns-and-nf-sequences in Latin, e.g., c onsul andīnfēlīx. Additionally, nasals were often lost in this environment. The nasal deletion was driven by articulatory mechanisms, namely the difficulty of articulating a nasal directly before an anterior fricative. Diverting air to the nasal cavity reduces oral air pressure; however, the articulation of fricatives requires high air pressure at the point of constriction in order for frication of the air stream to occur. Speakers of Latin reduced the articulatory burden of these sequences by reducing nasal air flow, and over time the nasals were deleted. Preceding vowels were then lengthened to compensate for the lost mora associated with the deleted nasal. The articulatory explanation for the development of nasal-fricative sequences will be supported by the facts of sociolinguistics: the reintroduction of nasals inns and -nf-sequences is associated with elite speech and formal contexts, where the coarticulation between these two segments can be closely monitored by speakers.
Related papers
The development of the intervocalic laryngeal in Latin
The development of laryngeals in the traditional interpretation depends purely on their sound environment and at least in the development into Latin no role is ascribed to in what morpheme or morphemes and on what position within the morpheme the relevant sound sequence occurs. However, in the process of elimination of laryngeals the extra-phonetic factors evidently also come into play that complicate the well-arranged rules and that have not yet been systematically explained. The article is concerned with a partial problem of this complex issue, namely the question of development of intervocalic laryngeal on the morphemic boundary between the root and the suffix. In Latin there are examples where for semantic reasons the deletion of the laryngeal is not followed by the contraction of vowels, but where an epenthetic consonant occurs in its place.
The Relative Chronology of Some Major Latin Sound Changes
1986
Parker, Holt. Dissertation, Yale Univ. 1986. The text is the UMI microfilm and unfortunately the text is only imperfectly searchable. This dissertation attempts a historical ordering of various Latin phonological rules. The starting point is the phonemic split of I into bright and dark allophones. Ch. 1 assembles the evidence for their phonetic quality. Ch. 2 concerns the assimilations of ld, ln, ls and lv to ll. Ch. 3 examines the sources for surface ld, In, Is and lv, in particular the case of helvus. Ch. 4 and 5 treat consonant clusters: rules of loss of stops before sC in Latin, and the loss of nasals with compensatory lengthening before spirants with parallels in Osco-Umbrian and Celtic (Ch. 4); the loss of liquids (Ch. 5). Part lI deals with changes in vowels. Changes in short vowels in initial syllables (Ch. 6). Changes of diphthongs in initial syllables (Ch. 7). Ch. 8 presents the weakening of vowels in medial syllables as an ordered series of rules. Ch. 9 details the process of R-Lowering (i > e, o > u before r in an open syllable) as a single rule. An excursus on dereduplication of the perfects of compound verbs, and a second on mollis and the adjectives in -ui- complete the work.