Zander

Hermelink B, Kleiner W, Schulz C et al. (2017) Photo-thermal manipulation for the reproductive management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca. Aquac Int 25: 1 – 20.

Kestemont P, Dabrowski K, Summerfelt RC (eds) Biology and Culture of Percid Fishes—Principles and Practices. Springer, New York, USA.

Lappalainen J, Dorner H, Wysujack K (2003) Reproduction biology of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca (L.)) – a review. Ecol. Freshwat. Fish 12: 95–106.

Ljubobratović U, Peter G, Horvath Z (2018) Effect of parental origin on dry feed habituation and Intensive on-growing results in pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) offspring. Turk J Fish Aquat Sc. 18: 425 – 433.

Policar T, Blecha M, Křišťan et al. (2016b) Comparison of production efficiency and quality of differently cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) juveniles as a valuable product for ongrowing culture. Aquac Int 24: 1607 – 1626.Schaefer FJ, Overton JL,  Bossuyt J et al. (2016a) Management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) sperm quality after stripping. J Appl Ichthyol 32: 1099 – 1106.

Schaefer FJ, Overton JL, Wuertz S (2016b) Pikeperch Sander lucioperca egg quality cannot be predicted by total antioxidant capacity and mtDNA fragmentation. Animal Reproduction Science 167: 117 – 124.

Schaefer FJ, Flues S, Meyer S et al. (2017) Inter- and intra-individual variability in growth and food consumption in pikeperch, Sander lucioperca L., larvae revealed by individual rearing.  Aquac Res 48: 800 – 808.

Schaefer FJ, Overton, JL, Kloas, W et al. (2018a) Length rather than year-round spawning, affects reproductive performance of RAS-reared F-generation pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (Linnaeus, 1758) - Insights from practice. J Appl Ichthyol 34: 617 – 621.

Schaefer F J, Overton J L, Kruger A et al. (2018b) Influence of batch-specific biochemical egg characteristics on embryogenesis and hatching success in farmed pikeperch. Animal 12: 2327 – 2334.

Schaefer FJ, Tielmann M, Overton JL et al (online published) Fate or independency: is batch-specific larval performance determined by egg traits? A case study in farmed pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). Aquac Int

Schäfer F, Policar T, Teerlinck S et al. (2015) European percid fish culture (EPFC) workshop 2014- summary. Aquaculture Europe 40: 33- 36.

Schlumberger O, Proteau JP (1996) Reproduction of pike-perch (Stizostedion lucioperca) in captivity. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 12:149-152.

Schulz C, Gűnther S, Wirth M et al. (2006) Growth performance and body composition of pike perch (Sander lucioperca) fed varying formulated and natural diets. Aquac. Int. 14: 577 – 586

Steffens W, Geldhauser F, Gerstner P et al. (1996) German experiences in the propagation and rearing of fi ngerling pikeperch ( Stizostedion lucioperca). Ann Zool Fenn 33:627–634.

Steinberg K, Zimmermann J, Meyer S et al (2018) Start-up of recirculating aquaculture systems: How do water exchange rates influence pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) and water composition? Aquaculture Eng 83: 151 – 159.

Tielmann M, Schulz C, Meyer S (2017) The effect of light intensity on performance of larval pike-perch (Sander lucioperca). Aquaculture Eng 77: 61 – 71.

Zakęś Z (2012) Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. Sander lucioperca. Cultured Aquatic Species Information Programme. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department [online]. Rome Italy. www.fao.org/fishery/culturedspecies /Sander_lucioperca/en

Zakęś Z, Szczepkowski M (2004) Induction of out-of-season spawning of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.). Aquacult. Int. 12: 11–18.

Zakęś Z, Demska-Zakęś K (2009) Controlled reproduction of pikeperch Sander lucioperca (L.): a review. Arch Pol Fish 17: 153–170.

Zakęś Z, Kapusta A, Hopko M et al. (2015) Growth, survival and tag retention in juvenile pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) in laboratory conditions. Aquac Res 46: 1276 – 1280.

Żarski D, Targońska K, Kaszubowski R, et al (2013) Effect of different commercial spawning agents and thermal regime on the effectiveness of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca (L.), reproduction under controlled conditions. Aquac Int 21:819–828.

Żarski D, Fontaine P, Roche, J et al. (2019) Time of response to hormonal treatment but not the type of a spawning agent affects the reproductive effectiveness in domesticated pikeperch, Sander lucioperca. Aquaculture 503: 527 – 536.

Produktionsstatistiken: FAO. 2024. FishStat: Global aquaculture production 1950-2022. In: FishStatJ. Available at www.fao.org/fishery/en/statistics/software/fishstatj. Licence: CC-BY-4.0. [19.06.2024]

[Stand 01/2020]