euroncap.com

Official Dacia Jogger 2021 safety rating

Total 26.6 Pts / 70%

  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor

Frontal Impact

12.1 / 16 Pts

  • Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier

  • Full Width Rigid Barrier

Lateral Impact

10.7 / 16 Pts

  • Side Mobile Barrier

    Side Pole

  • Far-Side Excursion

    Occupant Interaction

    Occupant Interaction

BioRID UN - 50th Percentile Male

BioRID UN - 50th Percentile Male

WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male

WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male

WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male

WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male

WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male

WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male

Hybrid III - 50th Percentile Male

THOR - 50th Percentile Male

Hybrid III - 5th Percentile Female

Hybrid III - 5th Percentile Female

Rear Seat

Front Seat

Rescue and Extrication 0.5 / 2 Pts

Rescue Sheet Available, ISO compliant PDF
Advanced eCall Not available
Multi Collision Brake Not available

Comments

The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated protection that was at least adequate for the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions, and protection for this part of the body was downgraded to marginal. Chest protection was also rated as marginal for both front seat occupants, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Analysis of the deformable barrier after the test revealed that it would be a benign crash opponent. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the front seat driver and rear seat passenger was at least adequate for all critical parts of the body. In the side barrier test, representing an impact by another vehicle, chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection. In the side pole test, protection of all critical body areas was rated as good or adequate. An assessment of the excursion of an occupant in a far-side impact showed poor protection and the car does not have a counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, for this accident type. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

VRU Protection :

Total 22.2 Pts / 41%

  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor

VRU Impact Protection

22.2 / 36 Pts

VRU Impact Protection

Head Impact 14.1 Pts

Pelvis Impact 2.3 Pts

Leg Impact 5.8 Pts

VRU Impact Mitigation 0.0 / 18 Pts

Comments

The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations. However, protection of the pelvis was poor over much of the width of the car. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Jogger does not detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists.

Total 6.4 Pts / 39%

  • Good
  • Adequate
  • Marginal
  • Weak
  • Poor

Speed Assistance 1.3 / 3 Pts

System Name Speed limiter
Speed Control Function Manually set (accurate to 5km/h)

Occupant Status Monitoring 0.6 / 3 Pts

> Seatbelt Reminder 0.6 / 2 Pts

> Driver Monitoring 0.0 / 1 Pts

AEB Car-to-Car 4.5 / 6 Pts

System Name Active Emergency Braking
Type Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning
Operational From 7 km/h
Sensor Used Radar only
  • Autobrake function only
  • Driver reacts to warning

Autobrake function only

  • Car turning across the path of an oncoming car

    Car turning across the path of an oncoming car

  • Approaching a stationary car

    Approaching a stationary car

  • Approaching a stationary car

    Approaching a stationary car

  • Approaching a stationary car

    Approaching a stationary car

  • Approaching a slower moving car

    Approaching a slower moving car

  • Approaching a slower moving car

    Approaching a slower moving car

  • Approaching a slower moving car

    Approaching a slower moving car

  • Approaching a braking car

    Approaching a braking car

Driver reacts to warning

  • Approaching a stationary car

    Approaching a stationary car

  • Approaching a stationary car

    Approaching a stationary car

  • Approaching a stationary car

    Approaching a stationary car

  • Approaching a slower moving car

    Approaching a slower moving car

  • Approaching a slower moving car

    Approaching a slower moving car

  • Approaching a slower moving car

    Approaching a slower moving car

  • Approaching a braking car

    Approaching a braking car

Comments

A seat belt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats. However, there is no reminder for the seat belts in the third row, where these are fitted, so the Jogger loses points compared with the Sandero Stepway on which the rating is based, and this is enough to drop the score in Safety Assist below the threshold required for two stars.  A driver-set speed limiter is also standard but the Jogger provides no lane assistance. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles with accidents avoided or mitigated in many cases.