Official Dacia Jogger 2021 safety rating
Total 26.6 Pts / 70%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Frontal Impact
12.1 / 16 Pts
-
Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier
-
Full Width Rigid Barrier
Lateral Impact
10.7 / 16 Pts
-
Side Mobile Barrier
Side Pole
-
Far-Side Excursion
Occupant Interaction
Occupant Interaction
BioRID UN - 50th Percentile Male
BioRID UN - 50th Percentile Male
WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male
WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male
WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male
WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male
WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male
WorldSID - 50th Percentile Male
Hybrid III - 50th Percentile Male
THOR - 50th Percentile Male
Hybrid III - 5th Percentile Female
Hybrid III - 5th Percentile Female
Rear Seat
Front Seat
Rescue and Extrication 0.5 / 2 Pts
Comments
The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated protection that was at least adequate for the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger. However, structures in the dashboard presented a risk of injury to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions, and protection for this part of the body was downgraded to marginal. Chest protection was also rated as marginal for both front seat occupants, based on dummy readings of chest compression. Analysis of the deformable barrier after the test revealed that it would be a benign crash opponent. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the front seat driver and rear seat passenger was at least adequate for all critical parts of the body. In the side barrier test, representing an impact by another vehicle, chest compression indicated a marginal level of protection. In the side pole test, protection of all critical body areas was rated as good or adequate. An assessment of the excursion of an occupant in a far-side impact showed poor protection and the car does not have a counter-measure, such as a centre airbag, for this accident type. Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. However, a geometric analysis of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.
VRU Protection :
Total 22.2 Pts / 41%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
VRU Impact Protection
22.2 / 36 Pts
Head Impact 14.1 Pts
Pelvis Impact 2.3 Pts
Leg Impact 5.8 Pts
VRU Impact Mitigation 0.0 / 18 Pts
Comments
The protection provided by the bonnet to the head of a struck pedestrian was predominantly good or adequate with poor results recorded at the base of the windscreen and on the stiff windscreen pillars. The bumper provided good or adequate protection to pedestrians' legs at all test locations. However, protection of the pelvis was poor over much of the width of the car. The autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system of the Jogger does not detect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists.
Total 6.4 Pts / 39%
- Good
- Adequate
- Marginal
- Weak
- Poor
Speed Assistance 1.3 / 3 Pts
System Name | Speed limiter |
Speed Control Function | Manually set (accurate to 5km/h) |
Occupant Status Monitoring 0.6 / 3 Pts
> Seatbelt Reminder 0.6 / 2 Pts
> Driver Monitoring 0.0 / 1 Pts
AEB Car-to-Car 4.5 / 6 Pts
System Name | Active Emergency Braking |
Type | Autonomous emergency braking and forward collision warning |
Operational From | 7 km/h |
Sensor Used | Radar only |
- Autobrake function only
- Driver reacts to warning
Autobrake function only
-
Car turning across the path of an oncoming car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Driver reacts to warning
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a stationary car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a slower moving car
-
Approaching a braking car
Comments
A seat belt reminder system is standard for the front and rear seats. However, there is no reminder for the seat belts in the third row, where these are fitted, so the Jogger loses points compared with the Sandero Stepway on which the rating is based, and this is enough to drop the score in Safety Assist below the threshold required for two stars. A driver-set speed limiter is also standard but the Jogger provides no lane assistance. The AEB system performed well in tests of its response to other vehicles with accidents avoided or mitigated in many cases.