pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Interleukin-4: A Cytokine to Remember

  • ️Wed Nov 25 2009

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2012 Nov 1;189(9):4213–4219. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202246

Abstract

IL-4 has been extensively studied in the context of its role in immunity. Accumulating evidence indicates, however, that it also plays a critical role in higher functions of the normal brain, such as memory and learning. In this review we summarize current knowledge of the basic immunology of IL-4, describe how and where this cytokine appears to operate in normal brain function, and propose a hypothesis concerning its potential role in neurological pathologies.

Keywords: IL-4, neuroimmunology, learning and memory, T cells, meninges

Introduction

The brain is frequently studied in isolation from the immune system. The principal reason for this is clear: conventional wisdom has long held that the brain is shielded from immune-cell infiltration by the blood-brain barrier. When this protective interface is breached and the immune system freely interacts with the brain, it frequently results in autoimmune attacks and other debilitating immune-related conditions. In reality, however, neuroimmune interactions appear to be crucial for everyday brain function. Mice in which adaptive immunity is absent or acutely suppressed exhibit cognitive impairment, which is expressed in their inability to perform spatial learning tasks, a defect that is reversible upon restoration of the T-cell pool (1–3). One likely locality for neuroimmune interactions is the subarachnoid space, a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-filled compartment of the meninges. Healthy human CSF contains ~150,000 leukocytes (~10,000 in the C57B6 mouse), most of which are central memory T cells (4). A recent study from our lab showed that performance of a learning and memory task is followed by an increase in the numbers and activation of T cells in the meninges. Moreover, administration of anti-VLA4, which prevents normal extravasation of T cells (and monocytes) into the CSF, produced a cognitive impairment similar to that seen in T cell-deficient mice (5).

T cells in the CSF appear ideally positioned to communicate with the brain. In healthy individuals, however, T cells do not penetrate the brain parenchyma, and any such communication must be mediated through a soluble messenger. We recently showed that IL-4, a T-cell-derived cytokine, is a critical participant in higher brain functions such as memory and learning (5). Mice lacking IL-4 demonstrate cognitive impairment in spatial learning tasks, and this can be reversed by transplantation of IL-4-competent bone marrow (5). Here we focus on the basic immunology of IL-4 as it pertains to the CNS, and in particular to the question of how and where it operates to influence cognition. We end with a review of the literature on the role of IL-4 in several neurological diseases.

IL-4 signaling

IL-4 is a cytokine that functions as a potent regulator of immunity secreted primarily by mast cells, Th2 cells, eosinophils and basophils. Initially identified by Howard and Paul (6) as a co-mitogen of B-cells, IL-4 was subsequently shown to be an important player in leukocyte survival under both physiological and pathological conditions such as (7, 8), Th2 cell-mediated immunity (9, 10), IgE class switching in B cells (11), and tissue repair and homeostasis through “alternative” macrophage activation, i.e., a pathway of macrophage activation that differs from the classical pro-inflammatory pathway (12). While granulocytes and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) (13) are capable of producing Th2 cytokines, the majority of currently available literature, including our own studies, focus on Th2 T cells.

The effect of IL-4 signaling is mediated through the IL-4 receptor alpha chain (IL-4Rα). Upon binding to its ligand, IL-4Rα dimerizes either with the common gamma chain (γc) to produce the type-1 signaling complex located mainly on hematopoietic cells, or with the IL-13 receptor alpha 1 (IL-13Rα1) to produce the type-2 complex, which is expressed also on non-hematopoietic cells (14, 15). The type-1 signaling complex is critical for Th2-skewing of T cells and the development of alternatively activated macrophages (AAMΦs), while the type-2 complex plays a role in non-hematopoietic responses to IL-4 and IL-13, for example airway hyper-reactivity and mucus production (16). The role of IL-13 in CNS function is understudied and merits further investigation.

Upon activation, the type-1 complex signals through Janus family kinases (JAK1 and JAK3), which phosphorylate and create docking sites for the transcription factor STAT6, which then dimerizes and translocates to the cell nucleus. Among its other actions, STAT6 promotes transcription of GATA3 (a Th2-cell inducer) and MHCII (myeloid and B cells) and induces IgE class switching in B cells (11, 17–19). JAK1 also phosphorylates insulin receptor substrate-1 and -2, which become activated and promotes survival and growth through the PI3/AKT, PKB/mTOR, and other pathways (20).

The type-2 receptors also signal through JAK family kinases (JAK1 and Tyk2), but are not expressed by T cells and instead are used by non-hematopoietic cells such as endothelial cells and fibroblasts to respond to IL-4. As with type-1, much of the message of type-2 receptors is conveyed by STAT6, which is phosphorylated and translocates to the nucleus upon ligand binding. Type 2 receptors also serve as receptors for IL-13, a cytokine with similarities to IL-4, and which first binds with the IL-13Rα1 and then dimerizes with IL-4Rα to produce the familiar signaling cascade (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. IL-4 signaling pathways.

Figure 1

After IL-4 binding IL-4Rα, the IL-4 receptor is created by dimerization with the common γ chain (γc) to create the type 1 signaling complex or with IL-13Rα1 to create the type 2 complex. Both receptors signal through STAT6, which is phosphorylated, dimerizes, and traffics to the nucleus to function as a transcription factor for Th2, IgE, and alternatively activated macrophage associated genes. The type 1 receptor also activates IRS1 and/or 2, leading to increased mitogenesis and inhibition of apoptosis through multiple signaling pathways. The type 2 complex also responds to IL-13, and it can signal other STAT molecules (ie. STAT3) through the JAK family kinase TYK2.

IL-4 as a mediator of T cell effects on brain function

Findings by our group and by others have demonstrated a fundamental role for T cells in cognition and brain homeostasis (2, 21–24). Mice lacking T lymphocytes exhibit cognitive impairment in learning tasks on the Morris water maze (MWM). An established behavior paradigm, the MWM takes place over a week where mice are placed once daily in a large plastic pool in which a platform is submerged under the opaque water. Salient visual cues are supplied in the testing room that allow the mice to gradually learn the location of the platform. Over the course of several days a healthy mouse will commit this location to memory, and exhibit progressively faster escape latency to the platform. (25). While T cell deficient mice spend considerably more time searching for the platform, MWM performance can be restored almost to the level of wild type mice by adoptive transfer of wild-type T cells or by bone-marrow transplantation from wild type to immune deficient counterparts. In addition to their spatial learning deficits, mice lacking both T and B cells (SCID, nude, or Rag1−/− mice) exhibit reduction of adult neurogenesis (2, 24, 26), an ongoing physiological process in which new neurons are generated in specific zones of the adult brain (27). Wolf et al. further identified CD4+ T-cells as the key immune population responsible for both adult neurogenesis and cognitive performance (24).

Inflammatory cytokines such IL-1β and TNF have been extensively studied in the brain, where they exert a negative effect on cognitive behavior, characterized by sickness, depression, and stress (28–30). We recently discovered that the effect of IL-4 on cognition, in contrast, is beneficial. After mice undergo training in the MWM, their meningeal T cells become activated and produce more IL-4 than untrained controls (5). Absence of the ability to produce IL-4 in response to learning has conspicuous consequences, as observed in the severe learning defects exhibited by IL-4−/− mice (5). These defects can be reversed by transplantation with wild-type bone marrow or adoptive transfer of IL-4-competent T cells, whereas both T cells and transplanted bone marrow derived from IL-4−/− mice are ineffective. Furthermore, wild-type mice transplanted with IL-4−/− bone marrow subsequently show learning impairment, reinforcing the role of IL-4 in cognition and demonstrating its dynamic nature (5).

The above and other findings clearly show that T cell-derived IL-4 has a profound effect on cognition, but its mechanism of action, given the stringent BBB, is unclear. Astrocytes, as described below, respond to IL-4 signaling and might serve as a mediator between the immune effector cells and the nervous responders. This possibility is supported, for example, by the fact that in wild-type mice but not in IL-4-knockout mice, training in the MWM is followed by astrocytic production of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) (5). This protein, which is responsible for growth and survival of neurons and for increased neuronal arborization of dendrites, has been shown to have a positive effect on learning, and its absence in IL-4-knockout mice might explain their cognitive defects (31, 32).

Another possible target for IL-4 is the meningeal myeloid compartment, where lack of IL-4 creates pro-inflammatory meningeal immune response (5). Meningeal myeloid cells (CD11b+) in SCID mice produce more TNF than their wild-type counterparts do (5). Adoptive transfer of wild-type T cells, but not of IL-4-knockout T cells, reduces this TNF production (5). Thus, IL-4 might be exerting its effect through an anti-inflammatory M2-skew (alternative activation) of meningeal macrophages, shown to be beneficial after CNS injury (33) and required for learning (34). Administration of M2-skewed macrophages, either intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v) or intravenously (i.v.), improves MWM performance (34). Whether these pro-cognitive effects of T cells through astrocytes and through M2 macrophages are separate or linked processes remains to be investigated, but in either case they provide interesting avenues for productive neuroimmune communication.

Cellular Targets of IL-4 in the Brain

IL-4 plays important roles in a myriad of cellular events, making it difficult to study its effects, particularly in vivo, on any one system. Although this review focuses on its neurological functions, most of what is known about IL4 comes from studies of peripheral immune cells, such as macrophages and lymphocytes. Therefore, in discussing the cellular targets of this cytokine we will extrapolate from those cell types where appropriate.

The earliest studies of IL-4 in macrophages showed that it acted as an anti-inflammatory agent when administered concurrently or shortly after an inflammatory stimulus, and was capable of downregulating the production of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF (35). IL-4 is not purely an anti-inflammatory agent, however, as priming of macrophages with IL-4 followed by pro-inflammatory stimulation can result in an enhanced inflammatory response (36). Studies in vivo showed that chronic high dosage or transgenic overproduction of IL-4 results in accumulation of AAMΦs, increased IFNγ expression, decreased pro-inflammatory cytokine production, histiocytosis, erythrophagocytosis, extramedullary hematopoiesis, and weight loss (37).

These data suggest that the in-vivo effects of IL-4 are complex, well regulated, dependent upon the local environment, and that they probably mediate different processes simultaneously in different tissues. The situation is even more complex in the context of the brain, which is clearly affected by IL-4, however little is known about the ability of this cyokine to access the parenchyma or the nature of its effects on target cells. Microglia and astrocytes within the CNS have been studied with regards to IL-4, but the possible role of IL-4 in directly stimulating neurons and oligodendrocytes is poorly understood.

Astrocytes

As mentioned above, BDNF production by astrocytes might provide a mechanism whereby IL-4 influences cognition (5). BDNF may not be the only participating factor, however, as IL-4 can also elicit astrocytic expression of other CNS growth factors, such as nerve growth factor (NGF) (38, 39). This function of IL-4 is not unexpected, as it can also induce other growth and survival pathways in the periphery (40). Astrocytes clearly respond to IL-4, but their receptor expression and the factors that regulate receptor expression are not well understood. In the epileptic brain astrocytes express high levels of IL-4Rα, but do not express IL-2Rγc (41), suggesting they may signal through the type 2 complex (the more typical receptor for non-hematopoetic cells; Fig.1).. IL-4 can exert both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects on astrocytes, depending on the treatment and timing paradigm. In primary mouse astrocytes, pretreatment with IL-4 decreases subsequent production of NO and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) protein, as well as secretion of TNF upon LPS stimulation (38). Similarly, concurrent treatment of primary fetal human astrocytes with IL-4 attenuates NO production by those cells when stimulated with IL-1β, TNF, or IFN-γ. (42). In another study, however, IL-1β-pretreated primary mouse astrocytes demonstrated enhanced IL-6 production when subsequently treated with IL-4, whereas treatment with IL-10 and dexamethasone yielded immunosuppressive effects. The same study showed that IL-1β induces IL-4Rα expression (43). Interestingly, both IFN-γ and IL-4 can elicit neuroprotective phenotypes in astrocytes. Treatment with IFN-γ enhances the ability of astrocytes to clear extracellular glutamate (an excitatory neurotransmitter), an effect that is antagonized by IL-4 (44). However, conditioned media from IL-4-treated astrocytes is neuroprotective in a dose-dependent manner, while the same is true for IFN-γ at low doses only (44). The findings of the latter study thus point to a complex interplay between these two canonical Th1 and Th2 cytokines in the context of neuroprotection. Altogether, the above findings show that astrocytes have a relationship to IL-4 that is complex and merits further study.

Microglia

Microglia are the brain’s equivalent of tissue-resident macrophages. Their lineage is similar to that of macrophages, although they engraft very early in development and maintain a self-renewing population throughout the life of the organism (45). However, when certain conditions are met, usually involving damage, new microglia-like cells from the monocyte lineage can be engrafted into the brain of an adult animal (46). While the exact relationship between macrophages and microglia requires additional study, understanding of related cell types is helpful in understanding the response of microglia to IL-4 and immune stimuli in general.

Microglia respond comparably to macrophages in skewing paradigms (M1 and the many variants of M2) (47, 48). These include gene expression changes such as Ym1 and Arg1, typical of IL-4-treated macrophages. Like macrophages, microglia respond to IFN-γ priming and subsequent stimulation by upregulating NO production through induction of iNOS (49). Incubation with IL-4 before priming with IFN-γ or TNF, and subsequent stimulation with phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), causes a dose-dependent decrease in NO production (49). Indeed, it has been shown that IL-4 exerts a neuroprotective effect via decreasing TNF and increasing IGF-1 (50). IL-4 also antagonizes IFN-γ-driven MHCII expression (51). However, IL-4 alone, after long-term exposure, also induces MHCII expression (50). CD200 is expressed on neurons, and its receptor, CD200R, is expressed on microglia, providing a possible mechanism for IL-4-mediated regulation of microglial activation (52). In this last work, neurons from IL-4−/− mice were found to be less effective than wild-type neurons in attenuating an inflammatory response, a result that was linked to lower CD200 expression on the IL-4−/− neurons. Another interesting finding was that IL-4-activated microglia can bias adult neural progenitor cells towards oligodendrogenesis (53). In addition, IL-4 was found to induce CD11c on microglia in vitro, a marker typically associated with dendritic cells (54). All in all, it seems that microglia and macrophages similarly respond to IL-4 signaling, and that absence of IL-4 heightens vulnerability to neuroinflammation. It remains unclear, however, whether IL-4 has a pro-inflammatory role in microglial biology, as it does in macrophages.

IL-4 in neurological pathology

IL-4 has a well-established role in the pathology of allergy and other immunological diseases, where it is secreted by T cells to induce B-cell activation and IgE class switching. Less well studied, but nevertheless also important, is its influence in other diseases, including neurological ones such as Alzheimer’s disease, multiple sclerosis, and glioblastoma multiforme.

Inflammatory changes in the aging and Alzheimer’s brains

Aging in humans and rodents is accompanied by steady cognitive decline. Among the contributors to this decline is an increase in baseline inflammation. The performance of aged mice in the MWM is impaired relative to that of younger adults, in correlation with pro-inflammatory changes in the hippocampal (55) and global (56) transcriptome (57). Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-18, are increased in the aged hippocampus and are known to affect long-term potentiation (LTP), a cellular mechanism of memory whereby the strength of neuronal connections is modified (58–60).

The effects of IL-4 in aging have been reported in only a few publications, but the role of this cytokine in counteracting inflammatory changes is indisputable, and the increase in cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-6 observed in aging animals is accompanied by a decrease in hippocampal IL-4 (61). The decrease is functional, and direct i.c.v. administration of IL-4 rescues the LTP defects observed in aged mice (62). IL-4 can also counter the effects of IL-1β on LTP when co-administered i.c.v. (61). Interestingly, microglia become less sensitive to IL-4 in aged mice and tend to activate more readily, with resulting impairment of LTP (63, 64). These experiments suggest a potential role for IL-4 in countering age-related pro-inflammatory changes, although whether the inflammation itself derives from a lack of IL-4 signaling is not known. The cognitive impairment seen in aged mice might be partially explained by the increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines and a decrease in the amount of and sensitivity to the opposing cytokine IL-4, which in turn disrupts LTP and impairs learning.

Many of the same inflammatory processes that operate in aging contribute to the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), such as IL-1β-related inflammation (65, 66). IL-4 treatment can reverse certain aspects of AD pathology in animal models, as shown for example by the finding that viral gene delivery of IL-4 to the CNS of an AD mouse model ameliorates several aspects of the disease (67).

There is also a tendency toward microglial activation in AD. Microglia tend to switch from M2-like to M1-like activation as AD progresses (68). The microglial regulatory molecules CD200 and CD200R are decreased in AD (69), leading to unchecked microglial activation. As described above, IL-4 regulates CD200/CD200R expression (52, 70), and one possible mechanism by which it exerts its effect in AD is by promoting CD200 expression on microglia, helping to quell their pathological activation (71). In addition to negating inflammatory mediators, IL-4 may confer direct benefit by inducing the IL-4-associated M2-type microglia, shown in vitro to have superior amyloid-beta (Aβ) clearance and its degradation, relative to M1 microglia (72, 73). In line with this, administration of Aβ-specific Th2 cells in the mouse model of AD improves spatial memory, decreases microglial plaque involvement, and reduces cerebral amyloid blood vessel pathology (74).

The role of IL-4 in multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive demyelinating condition characterized by a relapsing and remitting course of neurological symptoms such as blurred vision, impaired balance and paresthesias. As it progresses, MS can become increasingly debilitating and ultimately fatal. MS is often studied in rodents with experimental autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), an animal model for MS, which is induced in mice by adoptive transfer of CNS-reactive T cells or active immunization with CNS antigens. Studies of the severity of EAE in IL-4−/− mice relative to wild-type mice (75) point to a potentially protective role of IL-4 against the incidence and progression of MS.

The IL-4 receptor (IL-4R) is highly expressed on perivascular macrophages (76), pointing to the potential for IL-4 in regulating the myeloid compartment in animals with EAE. Microglia may help to protect the brain against autoimmunity by regulating themselves with local CNS-produced IL-4. Resting and EAE-derived microglia produce IL-4 and express Ym1 (an M2 marker), whereas infiltrating macrophages in EAE produce NO (an M1 marker) (48). Interestingly, replacement of IL-4−/− bone marrow by wild-type bone marrow does not suffice to reduce EAE severity to wild-type levels, pointing to the possible brain-endogenous source of IL-4 (48). Furthermore, administration of skewed M2 cells can significantly reduce EAE severity, even when injected after disease onset in rats (77) or i.c.v. into mice (78). The molecular signaling of M2 cells was recently established further in the murine EAE model, and suggested that M2 cells can inhibit atypical EAE via SOCS3 signaling (79). The above findings demonstrate the importance of myeloid skewing in MS, and suggest that IL-4 might coordinate a beneficial M2 response.

Glioblastoma multiforme and IL-4

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a devastating tumor with a 5-year-survival rate of ~3% (80). The role of IL-4 in cancer appears to differ from its role in other neurological diseases, in that it manifests somewhat contradictory pro- and anti-tumor effects depending on the tumor and the tissue type (81). Interestingly, the majority of GBM patients overexpress the IL-13Rα2 chain (82) and the IL-4R in culture (83, 84). In addition, GBM risk and outcome are altered by polymorphisms in these genes. There is a well-established inverse correlation between allergy, a disease process affected by IL-4, and GBM occurrence: individuals diagnosed with GBM are significantly less likely to report allergies (85, 86). This observation is supported by the finding that asthma-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the il4r, il13, and stat6 gene loci are also inversely correlated with occurrence of GBM (87, 88). Another study showed that certain polymorphisms in il4r correlate to improved GBM mortality rates (89). These studies highlight the importance of IL-4 and IL-13 in GBM biology, but the mechanism responsible for their effect is poorly understood. Early studies demonstrated that IL-4 inhibits GBM xenograft growth in inducible il-4ko cell lines (90) and when administered subcutaneously (91) or retrovirally (92). Other studies use adenoviral delivery of IL-4 under a hypoxia-inducible promoter in various GBM xenograft lines, showing marked regression of tumor growth and selective lysis of hypoxic cells following viral treatment (Post 2007, Cherry 2010). IL-4 is typically thought to aid in tumor control by blocking angiogenesis (90, 93) or recruiting eosinophils (94, 95).

As tumors progress, macrophages become skewed from a pro-inflammatory M1 to a tumor-promoting M2 phenotype. M2 macrophages support tumor growth and survival, inducing angiogenesis (through production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)), creating an immune-suppressive environment and encouraging invasiveness and metastasis (96, 97). In a non-brain cancer model, IL-4 together with IL-10 and VEGF is crucial to generation of the pro-invasive M2 myeloid skew, and inhibition of IL-4Rα in vivo blocks macrophage polarization (98). Thus IL-4 function in GBM might be dichotomous, being used by the tumor to create AAMΦs, but toxic when administered directly.

Concluding remarks

The studies described above collectively illustrate a crucial role for IL-4 in the regulation of brain immunity, with measureable downstream effects on spatial learning/memory and neurogenesis, and with implications for neurological disorders. From the data reviewed here it is tempting to assume that an “alternative” IL-4 driven activation of the immune system supports brain function, whereas molecules with classic “pro-inflammatory” signals hinder it. This view may however be an oversimplification of complex neuroimmune interactions taking place in boundaries of the brain and in the brain parenchyma. While pro-inflammatory cytokines have been implicated in the detrimental effects of sickness behavior, aging, and autoimmunity, it is likely that a proper balance in peripheral and brain immunity is required for optimal brain performance. In fact certain cytokines associated with classical inflammation are required for many aspects of vital CNS function such as synaptic scaling through glial TNF-alpha (99) and the role of IL-6 in ensuring functional LTP in the hippocampus (100).

In times of stress and disease the delicate balance in brain immunity is altered, with pro-inflammatory molecules produced to a high degree in response to a potential threat (28). Production of IL-4 by meningeal T cells and other cell types could therefore be viewed in terms of an evolutionary adaptation to restore balanced CNS function and cognition. New molecular and genetic tools that target IL-4, IL-13 and their receptors in specific cell types will advance the field and further our understanding on the precise roles of T cell-derived and non-T cell-derived IL-4 in the regulation of brain function.

While replacing or even directly altering CNS cells represents a substantial technical challenge, in part because of the BBB, the immune system is more easily targeted by drugs and can even be replaced by means of bone marrow transplantation. Therefore, a better understanding of the effects of the immune system on CNS function will open new therapeutic avenues for diseases that have traditionally been approached as purely neurological, but that have important and treatable immune components (101).

Figure 2. A working model of IL-4 function in the sub-arachnoid space after learning.

Figure 2

After MWM training, T cells in the meninges become activated by yet unknown mechanism and produce IL-4. IL-4 then may skew meningeal macrophages to M2, which have been shown to reverse cognitive defects of immunosuppresed mice. IL-4 additionally affects astrocytes, though it is unclear whether and how it crosses the blood brain barrier to do so. Other potential targets include microglia and neurons, though data is lacking to conclusively describe this response.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shirley Smith and Nicola Watson for editing the manuscript. We thank the members of the Kipnis lab for their valuable comments during multiple discussions of this work.

This work was primarily supported by a grant from the National Institute on Aging, NIH (award AG034113 to J. K).

References

  • 1.Cohen H, Ziv Y, Cardon M, Kaplan Z, Matar MA, Gidron Y, Schwartz M, Kipnis J. Maladaptation to mental stress mitigated by the adaptive immune system via depletion of naturally occurring regulatory CD4+CD25+ cells. Journal of Neurobiology. 2006;66:552–563. doi: 10.1002/neu.20249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ziv Y, Ron N, Butovsky O, Landa G, Sudai E, Greenberg N, Cohen H, Kipnis J, Schwartz M. Immune cells contribute to the maintenance of neurogenesis and spatial learning abilities in adulthood. Nature neuroscience. 2006;9:268–275. doi: 10.1038/nn1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brynskikh A, Warren T, Zhu J, Kipnis J. Adaptive immunity affects learning behavior in mice. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2008;22:861–869. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Engelhardt B, Ransohoff RM. The ins and outs of T-lymphocyte trafficking to the CNS: anatomical sites and molecular mechanisms. Trends Immunol. 2005;26:485–495. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2005.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Derecki NC, Cardani AN, Yang CH, Quinnies KM, Crihfield A, Lynch KR, Kipnis J. Regulation of learning and memory by meningeal immunity: a key role for IL-4. J Exp Med. 2010;207:1067–1080. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Howard M, Farrar J, Hilfiker M, Johnson B, Takatsu K, Hamaoka T, Paul WE. Identification of a T cell-derived b cell growth factor distinct from interleukin 2. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1982;155:914–923. doi: 10.1084/jem.155.3.914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hu-Li J, Mizuguchi SEJ, Ohara J, Mosmann T, Paul WE. B cell stimulatory factor 1 (interleukin 4) is a potent costimulant for normal resting lymphocytes. J Exp Med. 1987;159:7. doi: 10.1084/jem.165.1.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Minshall C, Arkins S, Straza J, Conners J, Dantzer R, Freund GG, Kelley KW. IL-4 and insulin-like growth factor-I inhibit the decline in Bcl-2 and promote the survival of IL-3-deprived myeloid progenitors. J Immunol. 1997;159:1225–1232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Seder RA, Paul WE, Davis MM, Fazekas de St Groth B. The presence of interleukin 4 during in vitro priming determines the lymphokine-producing potential of CD4+ T cells from T cell receptor transgenic mice. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1992;176:1091–1098. doi: 10.1084/jem.176.4.1091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hsieh CS, Heimberger AB, Gold JS, O’Garra A, Murphy KM. Differential regulation of T helper phenotype development by interleukins 4 and 10 in an alpha beta T-cell-receptor transgenic system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;89:6065–6069. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.13.6065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Geha RS, Jabara HH, Brodeur SR. The regulation of immunoglobulin E class-switch recombination. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:721–732. doi: 10.1038/nri1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3:23–35. doi: 10.1038/nri978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wills-Karp M, Finkelman FD. Innate lymphoid cells wield a double-edged sword. Nature immunology. 2011;12:1025–1027. doi: 10.1038/ni.2142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nelms K, Keegan AD, Zamorano J, Ryan JJ, Paul WE. The IL-4 receptor: signaling mechanisms and biologic functions. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:701–738. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Callard RE, Matthews DJ, Hibbert L. IL-4 and IL-13 receptors: are they one and the same? Immunology today. 1996;17:108–110. doi: 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80600-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ramalingam TR, Pesce JT, Sheikh F, Cheever AW, Mentink-Kane MM, Wilson MS, Stevens S, Valenzuela DM, Murphy AJ, Yancopoulos GD, Urban JF, Jr, Donnelly RP, Wynn TA. Unique functions of the type II interleukin 4 receptor identified in mice lacking the interleukin 13 receptor alpha1 chain. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:25–33. doi: 10.1038/ni1544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Goenka S, Kaplan MH. Transcriptional regulation by STAT6. Immunologic research. 2011;50:87–96. doi: 10.1007/s12026-011-8205-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gould HJ, Sutton BJ. IgE in allergy and asthma today. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:205–217. doi: 10.1038/nri2273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee GR, Fields PE, Griffin TJ, Flavell RA. Regulation of the Th2 cytokine locus by a locus control region. Immunity. 2003;19:145–153. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00179-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Luzina IG, Keegan AD, Heller NM, Rook GA, Shea-Donohue T, Atamas SP. Regulation of inflammation by interleukin-4: a review of “alternatives”. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2012 doi: 10.1189/jlb.0412214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kipnis J, Cohen H, Cardon M, Ziv Y, Schwartz M. T cell deficiency leads to cognitive dysfunction: implications for therapeutic vaccination for schizophrenia and other psychiatric conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8180–8185. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402268101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hess LM, Insel KC. Chemotherapy-related change in cognitive function: a conceptual model. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007;34:981–994. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.981-994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Staat K, Segatore M. The phenomenon of chemo brain. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9:713–721. doi: 10.1188/05.CJON.713-721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wolf SA, Steiner B, Akpinarli A, Kammertoens T, Nassenstein C, Braun A, Blankenstein T, Kempermann G. CD4-positive T lymphocytes provide a neuroimmunological link in the control of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 2009;182:3979–3984. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1984;11:47–60. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wolf SA, Steiner B, Wengner A, Lipp M, Kammertoens T, Kempermann G. Adaptive peripheral immune response increases proliferation of neural precursor cells in the adult hippocampus. Faseb J. 2009;23:3121–3128. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-113944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gage FH, Ray J, Fisher LJ. Isolation, characterization, and use of stem cells from the CNS. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:159–192. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dantzer R, O’Connor JC, Freund GG, Johnson RW, Kelley KW. From inflammation to sickness and depression: when the immune system subjugates the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:46–56. doi: 10.1038/nrn2297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Couthouis J, Hart MP, Shorter J, Dejesus-Hernandez M, Erion R, Oristano R, Liu AX, Ramos D, Jethava N, Hosangadi D, Epstein J, Chiang A, Diaz Z, Nakaya T, Ibrahim F, Kim HJ, Solski JA, Williams KL, Mojsilovic-Petrovic J, Ingre C, Boylan K, Graff-Radford NR, Dickson DW, Clay-Falcone D, Elman L, McCluskey L, Greene R, Kalb RG, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Ludolph A, Robberecht W, Andersen PM, Nicholson GA, Blair IP, King OD, Bonini NM, Van Deerlin V, Rademakers R, Mourelatos Z, Gitler AD. Feature Article: A yeast functional screen predicts new candidate ALS disease genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108:20881–20890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109434108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kelley KW, Bluthe RM, Dantzer R, Zhou JH, Shen WH, Johnson RW, Broussard SR. Cytokine-induced sickness behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2003;17(Suppl 1):S112–118. doi: 10.1016/s0889-1591(02)00077-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Choy KH, de Visser Y, Nichols NR, van den Buuse M. Combined neonatal stress and young-adult glucocorticoid stimulation in rats reduce BDNF expression in hippocampus: effects on learning and memory. Hippocampus. 2008;18:655–667. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hall J, Thomas KL, Everitt BJ. Rapid and selective induction of BDNF expression in the hippocampus during contextual learning. Nature neuroscience. 2000;3:533–535. doi: 10.1038/75698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Schwartz M. “Tissue-repairing” blood-derived macrophages are essential for healing of the injured spinal cord: from skin-activated macrophages to infiltrating blood-derived cells? Brain Behav Immun. 2010;24:1054–1057. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Derecki NC, Quinnies KM, Kipnis J. Alternatively activated myeloid (M2) cells enhance cognitive function in immune compromised mice. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2011;25:379–385. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2010.11.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hart PH, Vitti GF, Burgess DR, Whitty GA, Piccoli DS, Hamilton JA. Potential antiinflammatory effects of interleukin 4: suppression of human monocyte tumor necrosis factor alpha, interleukin 1, and prostaglandin E2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:3803–3807. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Major J, Fletcher JE, Hamilton TA. IL-4 pretreatment selectively enhances cytokine and chemokine production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse peritoneal macrophages. J Immunol. 2002;168:2456–2463. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.5.2456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Milner JD, Orekov T, Ward JM, Cheng L, Torres-Velez F, Junttila I, Sun G, Buller M, Morris SC, Finkelman FD, Paul WE. Sustained IL-4 exposure leads to a novel pathway for hemophagocytosis, inflammation, and tissue macrophage accumulation. Blood. 2010;116:2476–2483. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-11-255174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brodie C, Goldreich N, Haiman T, Kazimirsky G. Functional IL-4 receptors on mouse astrocytes: IL-4 inhibits astrocyte activation and induces NGF secretion. J Neuroimmunol. 1998;81:20–30. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(97)00154-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Awatsuji H, Furukawa Y, Hirota M, Murakami Y, Nii S, Furukawa S, Hayashi K. Interleukin-4 and -5 as modulators of nerve growth factor synthesis/secretion in astrocytes. Journal of neuroscience research. 1993;34:539–545. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490340506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gow DJ, Sester DP, Hume DA. CSF-1, IGF-1, and the control of postnatal growth and development. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2010;88:475–481. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0310158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Liu H, Prayson RA, Estes ML, Drazba JA, Barnett GH, Bingaman W, Liu J, Jacobs BS, Barna BP. In vivo expression of the interleukin 4 receptor alpha by astrocytes in epilepsy cerebral cortex. Cytokine. 2000;12:1656–1661. doi: 10.1006/cyto.2000.0773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hu S, Sheng WS, Peterson PK, Chao CC. Differential regulation by cytokines of human astrocyte nitric oxide production. Glia. 1995;15:491–494. doi: 10.1002/glia.440150412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pousset F, Cremona S, Dantzer R, Kelley K, Parnet P. Interleukin-4 and interleukin-10 regulate IL1-beta induced mouse primary astrocyte activation: a comparative study. Glia. 1999;26:12–21. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-1136(199903)26:1<12::aid-glia2>3.0.co;2-s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Garg SK, Kipnis J, Banerjee R. IFN-gamma and IL-4 differentially shape metabolic responses and neuroprotective phenotype of astrocytes. J Neurochem. 2009;108:1155–1166. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05872.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alliot F, Godin I, Pessac B. Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain. Brain Res Dev Brain Res. 1999;117:145–152. doi: 10.1016/s0165-3806(99)00113-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mildner A, Schmidt H, Nitsche M, Merkler D, Hanisch UK, Mack M, Heikenwalder M, Bruck W, Priller J, Prinz M. Microglia in the adult brain arise from Ly-6ChiCCR2+ monocytes only under defined host conditions. Nat Neurosci. 2007;10:1544–1553. doi: 10.1038/nn2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Michelucci A, Heurtaux T, Grandbarbe L, Morga E, Heuschling P. Characterization of the microglial phenotype under specific pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory conditions: Effects of oligomeric and fibrillar amyloid-beta. J Neuroimmunol. 2009;210:3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ponomarev ED, Maresz K, Tan Y, Dittel BN. CNS-derived interleukin-4 is essential for the regulation of autoimmune inflammation and induces a state of alternative activation in microglial cells. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2007;27:10714–10721. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1922-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chao CC, Hu S, Peterson PK. Modulation of human microglial cell superoxide production by cytokines. Journal of leukocyte biology. 1995;58:65–70. doi: 10.1002/jlb.58.1.65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Butovsky O, Talpalar AE, Ben-Yaakov K, Schwartz M. Activation of microglia by aggregated beta-amyloid or lipopolysaccharide impairs MHC-II expression and renders them cytotoxic whereas IFN-gamma and IL-4 render them protective. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005;29:381–393. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Suzumura A, Sawada M, Itoh Y, Marunouchi T. Interleukin-4 induces proliferation and activation of microglia but suppresses their induction of class II major histocompatibility complex antigen expression. J Neuroimmunol. 1994;53:209–218. doi: 10.1016/0165-5728(94)90031-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lyons A, McQuillan K, Deighan BF, O’Reilly JA, Downer EJ, Murphy AC, Watson M, Piazza A, O’Connell F, Griffin R, Mills KH, Lynch MA. Decreased neuronal CD200 expression in IL-4-deficient mice results in increased neuroinflammation in response to lipopolysaccharide. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2009;23:1020–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Butovsky O, Ziv Y, Schwartz A, Landa G, Talpalar AE, Pluchino S, Martino G, Schwartz M. Microglia activated by IL-4 or IFN-gamma differentially induce neurogenesis and oligodendrogenesis from adult stem/progenitor cells. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2006;31:149–160. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Butovsky O, Bukshpan S, Kunis G, Jung S, Schwartz M. Microglia can be induced by IFN-gamma or IL-4 to express neural or dendritic-like markers. Mol Cell Neurosci. 2007;35:490–500. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Verbitsky M, Yonan AL, Malleret G, Kandel ER, Gilliam TC, Pavlidis P. Altered hippocampal transcript profile accompanies an age-related spatial memory deficit in mice. Learn Mem. 2004;11:253–260. doi: 10.1101/lm.68204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zahn JM, Poosala S, Owen AB, Ingram DK, Lustig A, Carter A, Weeraratna AT, Taub DD, Gorospe M, Mazan-Mamczarz K, Lakatta EG, Boheler KR, Xu X, Mattson MP, Falco G, Ko MS, Schlessinger D, Firman J, Kummerfeld SK, Wood WH, 3rd, Zonderman AB, Kim SK, Becker KG. AGEMAP: a gene expression database for aging in mice. PLoS Genet. 2007;3:e201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lynch MA. Age-Related Neuroinflammatory Changes Negatively Impact on Neuronal Function. Frontiers in aging neuroscience. 2010;1:8. doi: 10.3389/neuro.24.006.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Bellinger FP, Madamba S, Siggins GR. Interleukin 1 beta inhibits synaptic strength and long-term potentiation in the rat CA1 hippocampus. Brain research. 1993;628:227–234. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(93)90959-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Balschun D, Wetzel W, Del Rey A, Pitossi F, Schneider H, Zuschratter W, Besedovsky HO. Interleukin-6: a cytokine to forget. The FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2004;18:1788–1790. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-1625fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Curran B, O’Connor JJ. The pro-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-18 impairs long-term potentiation and NMDA receptor-mediated transmission in the rat hippocampus in vitro. Neuroscience. 2001;108:83–90. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00405-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Maher FO, Nolan Y, Lynch MA. Downregulation of IL-4-induced signalling in hippocampus contributes to deficits in LTP in the aged rat. Neurobiology of aging. 2005;26:717–728. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Nolan Y, Maher FO, Martin DS, Clarke RM, Brady MT, Bolton AE, Mills KH, Lynch MA. Role of interleukin-4 in regulation of age-related inflammatory changes in the hippocampus. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:9354–9362. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412170200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Fenn AM, Henry CJ, Huang Y, Dugan A, Godbout JP. Lipopolysaccharide-induced interleukin (IL)-4 receptor-alpha expression and corresponding sensitivity to the M2 promoting effects of IL-4 are impaired in microglia of aged mice. Brain, behavior, and immunity. 2012;26:766–777. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.10.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Griffin R, Nally R, Nolan Y, McCartney Y, Linden J, Lynch MA. The age-related attenuation in long-term potentiation is associated with microglial activation. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2006;99:1263–1272. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04165.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kitazawa M, Cheng D, Tsukamoto MR, Koike MA, Wes PD, Vasilevko V, Cribbs DH, LaFerla FM. Blocking IL-1 signaling rescues cognition, attenuates tau pathology, and restores neuronal β-catenin pathway function in an Alzheimer’s disease model. Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 2011;187:6539–6549. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1100620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Abbas N, Bednar I, Mix E, Marie S, Paterson D, Ljungberg A, Morris C, Winblad B, Nordberg A, Zhu J. Up-regulation of the inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and IL-12 and down-regulation of IL-4 in cerebral cortex regions of APPSWE transgenic mice. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2002;126:50–57. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5728(02)00050-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Kiyota T, Okuyama S, Swan RJ, Jacobsen MT, Gendelman HE, Ikezu T. CNS expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-4 attenuates Alzheimer’s disease-like pathogenesis in APP+PS1 bigenic mice. FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology. 2010;24:3093–3102. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-155317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Jimenez S, Baglietto-Vargas D, Caballero C, Moreno-Gonzalez I, Torres M, Sanchez-Varo R, Ruano D, Vizuete M, Gutierrez A, Vitorica J. Inflammatory response in the hippocampus of PS1M146L/APP751SL mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: age-dependent switch in the microglial phenotype from alternative to classic. J Neurosci. 2008;28:11650–11661. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3024-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Walker DG, Dalsing-Hernandez JE, Campbell NA, Lue LF. Decreased expression of CD200 and CD200 receptor in Alzheimer’s disease: a potential mechanism leading to chronic inflammation. Experimental neurology. 2009;215:5–19. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lyons A, Downer EJ, Crotty S, Nolan YM, Mills KH, Lynch MA. CD200 ligand receptor interaction modulates microglial activation in vivo and in vitro: a role for IL-4. J Neurosci. 2007;27:8309–8313. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1781-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Koning N, van Eijk M, Pouwels W, Brouwer MS, Voehringer D, Huitinga I, Hoek RM, Raes G, Hamann J. Expression of the inhibitory CD200 receptor is associated with alternative macrophage activation. Journal of innate immunity. 2010;2:195–200. doi: 10.1159/000252803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Shimizu E, Kawahara K, Kajizono M, Sawada M, Nakayama H. IL-4-Induced Selective Clearance of Oligomeric {beta}-Amyloid Peptide1-42 by Rat Primary Type 2 Microglia. J Immunol. 2008;181:6503–6513. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Yamamoto M, Kiyota T, Walsh SM, Liu J, Kipnis J, Ikezu T. Cytokine-mediated inhibition of fibrillar amyloid-beta peptide degradation by human mononuclear phagocytes. Journal of immunology. 2008;181:3877–3886. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.6.3877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Cao C, Arendash GW, Dickson A, Mamcarz MB, Lin X, Ethell DW. Abeta-specific Th2 cells provide cognitive and pathological benefits to Alzheimer’s mice without infiltrating the CNS. Neurobiology of disease. 2009;34:63–70. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.12.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Falcone M, Rajan AJ, Bloom BR, Brosnan CF. A Critical Role for IL-4 in Regulating Disease Severity in Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis as Demonstrated in IL-4-Deficient C57BL/6 Mice and BALB/c Mice. J Immunol. 1998;160:4822–4830. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hulshof S, Montagne L, De Groot CJ, Van Der Valk P. Cellular localization and expression patterns of interleukin-10, interleukin-4, and their receptors in multiple sclerosis lesions. Glia. 2002;38:24–35. doi: 10.1002/glia.10050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mikita J, Dubourdieu-Cassagno N, Deloire MS, Vekris A, Biran M, Raffard G, Brochet B, Canron MH, Franconi JM, Boiziau C, Petry KG. Altered M1/M2 activation patterns of monocytes in severe relapsing experimental rat model of multiple sclerosis. Amelioration of clinical status by M2 activated monocyte administration. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 2011;17:2–15. doi: 10.1177/1352458510379243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Butovsky O, Landa G, Kunis G, Ziv Y, Avidan H, Greenberg N, Schwartz A, Smirnov I, Pollack A, Jung S, Schwartz M. Induction and blockage of oligodendrogenesis by differently activated microglia in an animal model of multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2006;116:905–915. doi: 10.1172/JCI26836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Qin H, Yeh WI, De Sarno P, Holdbrooks AT, Liu Y, Muldowney MT, Reynolds SL, Yanagisawa LL, Fox TH, 3rd, Park K, Harrington LE, Raman C, Benveniste EN. Signal transducer and activator of transcription-3/suppressor of cytokine signaling-3 (STAT3/SOCS3) axis in myeloid cells regulates neuroinflammation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:5004–5009. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117218109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Bondy ML, Scheurer ME, Malmer B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davis FG, Il’yasova D, Kruchko C, McCarthy BJ, Rajaraman P, Schwartzbaum JA, Sadetzki S, Schlehofer B, Tihan T, Wiemels JL, Wrensch M, Buffler PA. Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium. Cancer. 2008;113:1953–1968. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Olver S, Apte S, Baz A, Kienzle N. The duplicitous effects of interleukin 4 on tumour immunity: how can the same cytokine improve or impair control of tumour growth? Tissue antigens. 2007;69:293–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2007.00831.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Debinski W, Gibo DM. Molecular expression analysis of restrictive receptor for interleukin 13, a brain tumor-associated cancer/testis antigen. Mol Med. 2000;6:440–449. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Puri RK, Leland P, Kreitman RJ, Pastan I. Human neurological cancer cells express interleukin-4 (IL-4) receptors which are targets for the toxic effects of IL4-Pseudomonas exotoxin chimeric protein. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 1994;58:574–581. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910580421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Joshi BH, Leland P, Asher A, Prayson RA, Varricchio F, Puri RK. In Situ Expression of Interleukin-4 (IL-4) Receptors in Human Brain Tumors and Cytotoxicity of a Recombinant IL-4 Cytotoxin in Primary Glioblastoma Cell Cultures. Cancer Res. 2001;61:8058–8061. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Brenner AV, Linet MS, Fine HA, Shapiro WR, Selker RG, Black PM, Inskip PD. History of allergies and autoimmune diseases and risk of brain tumors in adults. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2002;99:252–259. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Wiemels JL, Wiencke JK, Sison JD, Miike R, McMillan A, Wrensch M. History of allergies among adults with glioma and controls. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 2002;98:609–615. doi: 10.1002/ijc.10239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Schwartzbaum J, Ahlbom A, Malmer B, Lonn S, Brookes AJ, Doss H, Debinski W, Henriksson R, Feychting M. Polymorphisms associated with asthma are inversely related to glioblastoma multiforme. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6459–6465. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ruan Z, Zhao Y, Yan L, Chen H, Fan W, Chen J, Wu Q, Qian J, Zhang T, Zhou K, Mao Y, Zhou L, Huang Y, Lu D. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in IL-4Ra, IL-13 and STAT6 genes occurs in brain glioma. Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition) 2011;3:33–45. doi: 10.2741/e217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Scheurer ME, Amirian E, Cao Y, Gilbert MR, Aldape KD, Kornguth DG, El-Zein R, Bondy ML. Polymorphisms in the interleukin-4 receptor gene are associated with better survival in patients with glioblastoma. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2008;14:6640–6646. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Saleh M, I, Davis D, Wilks AF. The paracrine role of tumour-derived mIL-4 on tumour-associated endothelium. International journal of cancer Journal international du cancer. 1997;72:664–672. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970807)72:4<664::aid-ijc19>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Topp MS, Papadimitriou CA, Eitelbach F, Koenigsmann M, Oelmann E, Koehler B, Oberberg D, Reufi B, Stein H, Thiel E. Recombinant human interleukin 4 has antiproliferative activity on human tumor cell lines derived from epithelial and nonepithelial histologies. Cancer research. 1995;55:2173–2176. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Benedetti S, Bruzzone MG, Pollo B, DiMeco F, Magrassi L, Pirola B, Cirenei N, Colombo MP, Finocchiaro G. Eradication of rat malignant gliomas by retroviral-mediated, in vivo delivery of the interleukin 4 gene. Cancer research. 1999;59:645–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Volpert OV, Fong T, Koch AE, Peterson JD, Waltenbaugh C, Tepper RI, Bouck NP. Inhibition of angiogenesis by interleukin 4. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1998;188:1039–1046. doi: 10.1084/jem.188.6.1039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Tepper RI, Coffman RL, Leder P. An eosinophil-dependent mechanism for the antitumor effect of interleukin-4. Science (New York, NY) 1992;257:548–551. doi: 10.1126/science.1636093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Curran CS, Bertics PJ. Eosinophils in glioblastoma biology. Journal of neuroinflammation. 2012;9:11. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gocheva V, Wang HW, Gadea BB, Shree T, Hunter KE, Garfall AL, Berman T, Joyce JA. IL-4 induces cathepsin protease activity in tumor-associated macrophages to promote cancer growth and invasion. Genes & development. 2010;24:241–255. doi: 10.1101/gad.1874010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Mantovani A, Sica A. Macrophages, innate immunity and cancer: balance, tolerance, and diversity. Current opinion in immunology. 2010;22:231–237. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2010.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Linde N, Lederle W, Depner S, van Rooijen N, Gutschalk CM, Mueller MM. Vascular endothelial growth factor-induced skin carcinogenesis depends on recruitment and alternative activation of macrophages. The Journal of pathology. 2012;227:17–28. doi: 10.1002/path.3989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Stellwagen D, Malenka RC. Synaptic scaling mediated by glial TNF-alpha. Nature. 2006;440:1054–1059. doi: 10.1038/nature04671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Balschun D, Wetzel W, Del Rey A, Pitossi F, Schneider H, Zuschratter W, Besedovsky HO. Interleukin-6: a cytokine to forget. Faseb J. 2004;18:1788–1790. doi: 10.1096/fj.04-1625fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Derecki NC, Cronk JC, Lu Z, Xu E, Abbott SB, Guyenet PG, Kipnis J. Wild-type microglia arrest pathology in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Nature. 2012;484:105–109. doi: 10.1038/nature10907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]