Objectively measured physical activity and fat mass in children: a bias-adjusted meta-analysis of prospective studies - PubMed
- ️Sat Jan 01 2011
Review
Objectively measured physical activity and fat mass in children: a bias-adjusted meta-analysis of prospective studies
Desiree C Wilks et al. PLoS One. 2011.
Abstract
Background: Studies investigating the prevention of weight gain differ considerably in design and quality, which impedes pooling them in conventional meta-analyses, the basis for evidence-based policy making. This study is aimed at quantifying the prospective association between measured physical activity and fat mass in children, using a meta-analysis method that allows inclusion of heterogeneous studies by adjusting for differences through eliciting and incorporating expert opinion.
Methods: Studies on prevention of weight gain using objectively measured exposure and outcome were eligible; they were adopted from a recently published systematic review. Differences in study quality and design were considered as internal and external biases and captured in checklists. Study results were converted to correlation coefficients and biases were considered either additive or proportional on this scale. The extent and uncertainty of biases in each study were elicited in a formal process by six quantitatively-trained assessors and five subject-matter specialists. Biases for each study were combined across assessors using median pooling. Results were combined across studies by random-effects meta-analysis.
Results: The combined correlation of the unadjusted results from the six studies was -0.04 (95%CI: -0.22, 0.14) with considerable heterogeneity (I² = 78%), which makes it difficult to interpret the result. After bias-adjustment the pooled correlation was -0.01 (95%CI: -0.18, 0.16) with apparent study compatibility (I² = 0%).
Conclusion: By using this method the prospective association between physical activity and fat mass could be quantitatively synthesized; the result suggests no association. Objectively measured physical activity may not be the key determinant of unhealthy weight gain in children.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c05/3044163/fe265ef2d1f5/pone.0017205.g001.gif)
In this study all internal biases were additive and all external biases were proportional. Internal biases were elicited from six assessors (A–F) and external biases from five assessors (G–K). Ranges indicate 67% confidence intervals for the bias, so the bias is considered twice as likely to be inside the interval as outside it. A blank indicates no bias for that category.
![Figure 2](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c05/3044163/be963704e0e6/pone.0017205.g002.gif)
Shown is the impact on correlations (95% confidence intervals) of adjusting for bias for the assessors (A–F and G–K) separately and combined using median pooling. Values on the left hand side of the x-axis represent a negative correlation between physical activity and change in adiposity, i.e. greater baseline physical activity is related to a smaller increase in adiposity.
![Figure 3](https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c05/3044163/c5263abc8841/pone.0017205.g003.gif)
The six studies evaluate the prospective associations between measured physical activity and subsequent change in adiposity in children. The correlation in each source study and the combined correlation are presented, with 95% confidence intervals.
Similar articles
-
A proposed method of bias adjustment for meta-analyses of published observational studies.
Thompson S, Ekelund U, Jebb S, Lindroos AK, Mander A, Sharp S, Turner R, Wilks D. Thompson S, et al. Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Jun;40(3):765-77. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq248. Epub 2010 Dec 23. Int J Epidemiol. 2011. PMID: 21186183 Free PMC article.
-
Wilks DC, Mander AP, Jebb SA, Thompson SG, Sharp SJ, Turner RM, Lindroos AK. Wilks DC, et al. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jan 22;11:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-48. BMC Public Health. 2011. PMID: 21255448 Free PMC article.
-
Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P. Crider K, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Wilks DC, Besson H, Lindroos AK, Ekelund U. Wilks DC, et al. Obes Rev. 2011 May;12(5):e119-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00775.x. Obes Rev. 2011. PMID: 20604868 Review.
-
Mayer-Davis E, Leidy H, Mattes R, Naimi T, Novotny R, Schneeman B, Kingshipp BJ, Spill M, Cole NC, Bahnfleth CL, Butera G, Terry N, Obbagy J. Mayer-Davis E, et al. Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; 2020 Jul. Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; 2020 Jul. PMID: 35349233 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M, Henry D, Altman DG, Ansari MT, Boutron I, Carpenter JR, Chan AW, Churchill R, Deeks JJ, Hróbjartsson A, Kirkham J, Jüni P, Loke YK, Pigott TD, Ramsay CR, Regidor D, Rothstein HR, Sandhu L, Santaguida PL, Schünemann HJ, Shea B, Shrier I, Tugwell P, Turner L, Valentine JC, Waddington H, Waters E, Wells GA, Whiting PF, Higgins JP. Sterne JA, et al. BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919. BMJ. 2016. PMID: 27733354 Free PMC article.
-
Gerber M, Lang C, Beckmann J, du Randt R, Long KZ, Müller I, Nienaber M, Probst-Hensch N, Steinmann P, Pühse U, Utzinger J, Nqweniso S, Walter C. Gerber M, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 19;19(18):11836. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811836. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36142108 Free PMC article.
-
Schwarzfischer P, Gruszfeld D, Socha P, Luque V, Closa-Monasterolo R, Rousseaux D, Moretti M, Mariani B, Verduci E, Koletzko B, Grote V. Schwarzfischer P, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Dec 7;15(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0756-3. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018. PMID: 30526600 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention and treatment of childhood and adolescent obesity: a systematic review of meta-analyses.
Psaltopoulou T, Tzanninis S, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Panotopoulos G, Kostopoulou M, Tzanninis IG, Tsagianni A, Sergentanis TN. Psaltopoulou T, et al. World J Pediatr. 2019 Aug;15(4):350-381. doi: 10.1007/s12519-019-00266-y. Epub 2019 Jul 16. World J Pediatr. 2019. PMID: 31313240
-
Brown HE, Atkin AJ, Panter J, Corder K, Wong G, Chinapaw MJ, van Sluijs E. Brown HE, et al. BMJ Open. 2014 Aug 6;4(8):e005439. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005439. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25099934 Free PMC article.
References
-
- NHS The Information Centre. Health Survey for England. 2007. Available: http://www.ic.nhs.uk. Accessed 2009 Sept 20.
-
- De Onis M, Blossner M. Prevalence and trends of overweight among preschool children in developing countries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:1032–9. - PubMed
-
- Deckelbaum RJ, Williams CL. Childhood obesity: the health issue. Obes Res. 2001;9(suppl):239S–43S. - PubMed
-
- Guo SS, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Gardner JD, Siervogel RM. The predictive value of childhood body mass index values for overweight at age 35 y. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59:810–9. - PubMed
-
- Dietz WH. Health consequences of obesity in youth: childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics. 1998;101:518–25. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources