Feel the Noise: Relating Individual Differences in Auditory Imagery to the Structure and Function of Sensorimotor Systems - PubMed
. 2015 Nov;25(11):4638-50.
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv134. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
Nadine Lavan 2 , Samuel Evans 3 , Zarinah Agnew 4 , Andrea R Halpern 5 , Pradheep Shanmugalingam 3 , Sophie Meekings 3 , Dana Boebinger 3 , Markus Ostarek 3 , Carolyn McGettigan 2 , Jane E Warren 6 , Sophie K Scott 3
Affiliations
- PMID: 26092220
- PMCID: PMC4816805
- DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv134
Feel the Noise: Relating Individual Differences in Auditory Imagery to the Structure and Function of Sensorimotor Systems
César F Lima et al. Cereb Cortex. 2015 Nov.
Abstract
Humans can generate mental auditory images of voices or songs, sometimes perceiving them almost as vividly as perceptual experiences. The functional networks supporting auditory imagery have been described, but less is known about the systems associated with interindividual differences in auditory imagery. Combining voxel-based morphometry and fMRI, we examined the structural basis of interindividual differences in how auditory images are subjectively perceived, and explored associations between auditory imagery, sensory-based processing, and visual imagery. Vividness of auditory imagery correlated with gray matter volume in the supplementary motor area (SMA), parietal cortex, medial superior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. An analysis of functional responses to different types of human vocalizations revealed that the SMA and parietal sites that predict imagery are also modulated by sound type. Using representational similarity analysis, we found that higher representational specificity of heard sounds in SMA predicts vividness of imagery, indicating a mechanistic link between sensory- and imagery-based processing in sensorimotor cortex. Vividness of imagery in the visual domain also correlated with SMA structure, and with auditory imagery scores. Altogether, these findings provide evidence for a signature of imagery in brain structure, and highlight a common role of perceptual-motor interactions for processing heard and internally generated auditory information.
Keywords: auditory imagery; auditory processing; fMRI; supplementary motor area; voxel-based morphometry.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press.
Figures

Association between gray matter volume and vividness of auditory imagery. (A) Cluster with peak in left SMA showing a significant positive correlation with vividness of auditory imagery in whole-brain analysis. Statistical maps were thresholded at P < 0.005 peak-level uncorrected, cluster corrected with a FWE correction (P < 0.05). (B) Scatterplot showing the association between vividness ratings and adjusted gray matter volume within the cluster depicted in (A).

Brain regions in which BOLD responses were modulated by sound type during the processing of heard auditory information. The dotted dark red circle denotes a 12-mm sphere centered at the peak of the SMA cluster where the amount of gray matter was shown to correlate with auditory imagery (VBM study); this sphere was used for the representational similarity analysis looking at the links between representational specificity of heard sounds and vividness of imagery. For visualization purposes, activation maps were thresholded at P < 0.005 peak-level uncorrected (full details of activated sites are presented in Table 2).

Association between lower representational similarity of functional responses to different types of heard sounds in SMA (i.e., higher specificity/fidelity) and higher reported vividness of auditory imagery.

Association between vividness of visual and auditory imagery. Higher vividness corresponds to higher ratings for auditory and visual imagery.
Similar articles
-
Roles of Supplementary Motor Areas in Auditory Processing and Auditory Imagery.
Lima CF, Krishnan S, Scott SK. Lima CF, et al. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Aug;39(8):527-542. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 2. Trends Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27381836 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Behavioral and neural correlates of perceived and imagined musical timbre.
Halpern AR, Zatorre RJ, Bouffard M, Johnson JA. Halpern AR, et al. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(9):1281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.12.017. Neuropsychologia. 2004. PMID: 15178179 Clinical Trial.
-
Gu J, Zhang H, Liu B, Li X, Wang P, Wang B. Gu J, et al. Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Nov;224(8):2925-2937. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01948-z. Epub 2019 Aug 29. Brain Struct Funct. 2019. PMID: 31468120
-
The neural correlates of visual imagery vividness - An fMRI study and literature review.
Fulford J, Milton F, Salas D, Smith A, Simler A, Winlove C, Zeman A. Fulford J, et al. Cortex. 2018 Aug;105:26-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.014. Epub 2017 Oct 3. Cortex. 2018. PMID: 29079342 Review.
Cited by
-
Whitton SA, Sreenan B, Luo C, Jiang F. Whitton SA, et al. J Neurosci Res. 2024 Sep;102(9):e25383. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25383. J Neurosci Res. 2024. PMID: 39286933
-
What Has Replication Ever Done for Us? Insights from Neuroimaging of Speech Perception.
Evans S. Evans S. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Feb 1;11:41. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00041. eCollection 2017. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017. PMID: 28203154 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Musical imagery depends upon coordination of auditory and sensorimotor brain activity.
Gelding RW, Thompson WF, Johnson BW. Gelding RW, et al. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 14;9(1):16823. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-53260-9. Sci Rep. 2019. PMID: 31727968 Free PMC article.
-
Roles of Supplementary Motor Areas in Auditory Processing and Auditory Imagery.
Lima CF, Krishnan S, Scott SK. Lima CF, et al. Trends Neurosci. 2016 Aug;39(8):527-542. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jul 2. Trends Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 27381836 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Zhang Y, Chen G, Wen H, Lu KH, Liu Z. Zhang Y, et al. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 6;7(1):17066. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17178-4. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 29213104 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ashburner J. 2007. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 38:95–113. - PubMed
-
- Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2000. Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage. 11:805–821. - PubMed
-
- Ashburner J, Friston KJ. 2005. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage. 26:839–851. - PubMed
-
- Blesser B. 1972. Speech perception under conditions of spectral transformation. J Speech Hear Res. 15:5–41. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical