Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality - PubMed
- ️Thu Jan 01 2015
. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2263-70.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553.
Affiliations
- PMID: 26624825
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.15553
Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality
George Molina et al. JAMA. 2015.
Abstract
Importance: Based on older analyses, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that cesarean delivery rates should not exceed 10 to 15 per 100 live births to optimize maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Objectives: To estimate the contemporary relationship between national levels of cesarean delivery and maternal and neonatal mortality.
Design, setting, and participants: Cross-sectional, ecological study estimating annual cesarean delivery rates from data collected during 2005 to 2012 for all 194 WHO member states. The year of analysis was 2012. Cesarean delivery rates were available for 54 countries for 2012. For the 118 countries for which 2012 data were not available, the 2012 cesarean delivery rate was imputed from other years. For the 22 countries for which no cesarean rate data were available, the rate was imputed from total health expenditure per capita, fertility rate, life expectancy, percent of urban population, and geographic region.
Exposures: Cesarean delivery rate.
Main outcomes and measures: The relationship between population-level cesarean delivery rate and maternal mortality ratios (maternal death from pregnancy related causes during pregnancy or up to 42 days postpartum per 100,000 live births) or neonatal mortality rates (neonatal mortality before age 28 days per 1000 live births).
Results: The estimated number of cesarean deliveries in 2012 was 22.9 million (95% CI, 22.5 million to 23.2 million). At a country-level, cesarean delivery rate estimates up to 19.1 per 100 live births (95% CI, 16.3 to 21.9) and 19.4 per 100 live births (95% CI, 18.6 to 20.3) were inversely correlated with maternal mortality ratio (adjusted slope coefficient, -10.1; 95% CI, -16.8 to -3.4; P = .003) and neonatal mortality rate (adjusted slope coefficient, -0.8; 95% CI, -1.1 to -0.5; P < .001), respectively (adjusted for total health expenditure per capita, population, percent of urban population, fertility rate, and region). Higher cesarean delivery rates were not correlated with maternal or neonatal mortality at a country level. A sensitivity analysis including only 76 countries with the highest-quality cesarean delivery rate information had a similar result: cesarean delivery rates greater than 6.9 to 20.1 per 100 live births were inversely correlated with the maternal mortality ratio (slope coefficient, -21.3; 95% CI, -32.2 to -10.5, P < .001). Cesarean delivery rates of 12.6 to 24.0 per 100 live births were inversely correlated with neonatal mortality (slope coefficient, -1.4; 95% CI, -2.3 to -0.4; P = .004).
Conclusions and relevance: National cesarean delivery rates of up to approximately 19 per 100 live births were associated with lower maternal or neonatal mortality among WHO member states. Previously recommended national target rates for cesarean deliveries may be too low.
Comment in
-
Cesarean Delivery Rates: Revisiting a 3-Decades-Old Dogma.
D'Alton ME, Hehir MP. D'Alton ME, et al. JAMA. 2015 Dec 1;314(21):2238-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15948. JAMA. 2015. PMID: 26624823 No abstract available.
-
Target rates for caesarean section may be too low, say researchers.
Wise J. Wise J. BMJ. 2015 Dec 1;351:h6439. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6439. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26631166 No abstract available.
-
Challenging times for occupational medicine.
Heron R, Cordell R. Heron R, et al. BMJ. 2015 Dec 3;351:h6440. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6440. BMJ. 2015. PMID: 26634779 No abstract available.
-
Maternal and Neonatal Mortality After Cesarean Delivery.
Uzoigwe C, Sanchez Franco LC, Gascon Conde I. Uzoigwe C, et al. JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):2016-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0924. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27163992 No abstract available.
-
Maternal and Neonatal Mortality After Cesarean Delivery--Reply.
Molina G, Weiser TG, Haynes AB. Molina G, et al. JAMA. 2016 May 10;315(18):2017. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0927. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27163993 No abstract available.
-
Determination of a single, universal threshold for caesarean section rate is not the way forward.
Betrán AP, Zhang J, Torloni MR, Gülmezoglu AM. Betrán AP, et al. Evid Based Med. 2016 Dec;21(6):237. doi: 10.1136/ebmed-2016-110393. Epub 2016 Sep 23. Evid Based Med. 2016. PMID: 27664175 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Xie RH, Gaudet L, Krewski D, Graham ID, Walker MC, Wen SW. Xie RH, et al. Birth. 2015 Mar;42(1):62-9. doi: 10.1111/birt.12153. Epub 2015 Jan 17. Birth. 2015. PMID: 25597509
-
Hankins GD, Clark SM, Munn MB. Hankins GD, et al. Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009. Semin Perinatol. 2006. PMID: 17011400 Review.
-
Ananth CV, Friedman AM, Goldenberg RL, Wright JD, Vintzileos AM. Ananth CV, et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Oct 1;172(10):949-957. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1792. JAMA Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 30105352 Free PMC article.
-
Obstetrical deliveries associated with maternal malignancy in California, 1992 through 1997.
Smith LH, Dalrymple JL, Leiserowitz GS, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM. Smith LH, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jun;184(7):1504-12; discussion 1512-3. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.114867. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001. PMID: 11408874
-
Irani M, Deering S. Irani M, et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 Jun 19. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015. PMID: 26115791 Review.
Cited by
-
Breaking Specialty Silos: Improving Global Child Health Through Essential Surgical Care.
Wasserman I, Peters AW, Roa L, Amanullah F, Samad L. Wasserman I, et al. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Jun 30;8(2):183-189. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00009. Print 2020 Jun 30. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020. PMID: 32606090 Free PMC article.
-
Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, an ICHOM proposal.
Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, Olson E, Amer-Wahlin I, Bonsel G, Brooks A, Coleman M, Devi Karalasingam S, Duffy JMN, Flanagan T, Gebhardt S, Greene ME, Groenendaal F, R Jeganathan JR, Kowaliw T, Lamain-de-Ruiter M, Main E, Owens M, Petersen R, Reiss I, Sakala C, Speciale AM, Thompson R, Okunade O, Franx A. Nijagal MA, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):953. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3732-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 30537958 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of obstetric practices and outcomes in a deep rural district hospital in South Africa.
Asghar AK, Nkabinde TC, Naidoo M. Asghar AK, et al. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 4;17(1):e0262269. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262269. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 34982786 Free PMC article.
-
Koch R, Nkurunziza T, Rudolfson N, Nkurunziza J, Bakorimana L, Irasubiza H, Sonderman K, Riviello R, Hedt-Gauthier BL, Shrime M, Kateera F. Koch R, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 31;22(1):717. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08101-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 35642031 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Wahabi H, Fayed A, Elmorshedy H, Esmaeil SA, Amer YS, Saeed E, Jamal A, Aleban SA, Aldawish RA, Alyahiwi LS, Abdullah Alnafisah H, AlSubki RE, Albahli NK, Almutairi AA. Wahabi H, et al. Int J Womens Health. 2023 Aug 8;15:1283-1293. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S414380. eCollection 2023. Int J Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 37576185 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical