pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Down syndrome screening and diagnosis practices in Europe, United States, Australia, and New Zealand from 1990-2021 - PubMed

Review

Down syndrome screening and diagnosis practices in Europe, United States, Australia, and New Zealand from 1990-2021

Henry C Wilmot et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 May.

Abstract

Antenatal screening and diagnostic testing for Down syndrome has greatly advanced over the past 30 years. The goal of this manuscript is to provide a review of the availability and accessibility of prenatal services and selective termination policies across Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States for the period 1990-2021. We collected data from academic peer-reviewed journals, governmental documents, not-for-profit organizations, correspondence with experts, and other online sources without language restrictions. Prenatal screening services from 1990-2021 became increasingly available across countries, enabling expectant couples the opportunity to gain more accurate information earlier in the pregnancy before assuming the risk associated with more invasive techniques like CVS or amniocentesis. Many countries also began adopting prenatal screening as a qualification for prenatal diagnosis. As of 2021, at least 76.9% of countries offered full coverage for diagnostic testing for Down syndrome from government funding. Abortion coverage for a Down syndrome diagnosis was covered fully by government funding in 52.4% of countries in 1990, increasing to 73.8% in 2021. Understanding the changing landscape of prenatal services builds the foundation for future investigation into social policies that affect the prevalence of Down syndrome.

© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Human Genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Skotko occasionally consults on the topic of Down syndrome through Gerson Lehrman Group. He receives remuneration from Down syndrome non-profit organizations for speaking engagements and associated travel expenses. Dr. Skotko receives annual royalties from Woodbine House, Inc., for the publication of his book, Fasten Your Seatbelt: A Crash Course on Down Syndrome for Brothers and Sisters. Within the past two years, he has received research funding from F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. and LuMind Research Down Syndrome Foundation to conduct clinical trials for people with Down syndrome. Dr. Skotko is occasionally asked to serve as an expert witness for legal cases where Down syndrome is discussed. Dr. Skotko serves in a non-paid capacity on the Honorary Board of Directors for the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress and the Professional Advisory Committee for the National Center for Prenatal and Postnatal Down Syndrome Resources. Dr. Skotko has a sister with Down syndrome. Dr. de Graaf had a daughter with DS, who passed away in 2005 at the age of 15. He works as science and education officer at the Dutch Down Syndrome Foundation, a nonprofit organization. Frank Buckley serves as CEO of Down Syndrome Education International and Down Syndrome Education USA, nonprofits engaged in research and support for young people with Down syndrome. He had a sister with Down syndrome, who passed away in 2020. Dr. van Casteren has a daughter with Down syndrome. Henry Wilmot declares no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Government-provided coverage of abortion for Down syndrome, 1990–2021.

Full = full government-provided coverage for the population for which selective abortion for DS is made available; Partial = (a) partial government-provided coverage for the population for which selective abortion for DS is made available or (b) government-provided coverage for only part of the population for which selective abortion for DS is made available; None = no government-provided coverage.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Government-provided coverage of abortion for Down syndrome in 2021.

Full = full government-provided coverage for the population for which selective abortion for DS is made available; Partial = (a) partial government-provided coverage for the population for which selective abortion for DS is made available or (b) government-provided coverage for only part of the population for which selective abortion for DS is made available; None = no government-provided coverage.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Government-provided coverage of prenatal screening for Down syndrome, 1990–2021.

Full = full government-provided coverage for the full population; Partial = (a) partial coverage: partial government-provided coverage for the population and/or (b) partial availability: government-provided coverage for only part of the population; None = no government-provided coverage.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Government-provided coverage of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in 2021.

Full = full government-provided coverage for the full population; Partial = (a) partial coverage: partial government-provided coverage for the population and/or (b) partial availability: government-provided coverage for only part of the population; None = no government-provided coverage.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Government-provided coverage of amniocentesis or CVS for Down syndrome, 1990–2021.

Full = full government-provided coverage for the population for which amniocentesis or CVS is made available; Partial = (a) partial government-provided coverage for the population for which amniocentesis or CVS is made available or (b) government-provided coverage for only part of the population for which amniocentesis or CVS is made available; None = no government-provided coverage.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6. Government-provided coverage of amniocentesis or CVS for Down syndrome in 2021.

Full = full government-provided coverage for the population for which amniocentesis or CVS is made available; Partial = (a) partial government-provided coverage for the population for which amniocentesis or CVS is made available or (b) government-provided coverage for only part of the population for which amniocentesis or CVS is made available; None = no government-provided coverage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 88, December 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110:1459–67. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000291570.63450.44. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norwitz ER, Levy B. Noninvasive prenatal testing: the future is now. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6:48–62. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abortion Legislation In Europe: Updated January 2012 [Internet]. IPPF European Network; 2012 [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://europe.ippf.org/resource/abortion-legislation-europe.
    1. Special Report: Prenatal Screening Policies in Europe [Internet]. EUROCAT Central Registry, University of Ulster; 2010 [cited 2021 Jul 9]. Available from: https://www.orpha.net/actor/Orphanews/2010/doc/Special-Report-Prenatal-S....
    1. de Graaf G, Skladzien E, Buckley F, Skotko BG. Estimation of the number of people with Down syndrome in Australia and New Zealand. Genet Med. 2022;24:2568–77. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.08.029. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms